Show your ww3 loadout>main gun>sidearm>melee (OHHH YEEAAH)
>>62530239
>muh dik>muh bawls>muh coom
>>62530272I think that’s a war crime
>>62530282yeah
>>62530268Grugmaxed
>>62530282>>62530294But extremely concealable.
>>62530239>no lights>that barrelWhy
a couple sharpies. ill be working in property
>>62530239>>main gun22 mag revolver, several thousand rounds of ammo in a small pack>>sidearmrecurve bow>>melee (OHHH YEEAAH)hatchetI have no plans on fighting anyone or even being near anyone else besides my immediate family.
>>62532301Barrel is lightweight but durable and accurate enough. Light is on its way
>>62533337>durableNo it isn’t lol, a cold hammer forged chrome lined barrel is. That barrel would make sense with a magnified say 2-10 but not that optic setup (which is perfectly adequate). Its just a strange mix of parts that don’t go together
don't get it twisted, the gun is my backup.
https://streamable.com/2pdrwz
>>62533748Counterpoint, 18” barrel inside 200 yards chews shit up
It's all I need.
>>62538850I’m assuming I don’t get to bring friends?
My ruger ranch in 5.56 and my secondary will be my 12 guage under over which I will cut down to 6 inches cause law wont matter then
>>62530268based and /thread
>>62530239Plus a 590A1 SBS. My sidearm is more buckshot.
>>62538821How much did those chairs cost vs a regular office chair with wheels
>>62538765Patricians choice. I like your stye
>>62534908Heads up, the numbers are still visible
>>62541757>>62538765>>62541306Will not only make it, but will look good doing it. Shotguns are the choice of people who think their decisions through instead of just rushing into conflict because they've got a 60 round mag and nothing to lose
>>62541829It’s not bad to have both. For home defense I have my AR and shotgun side by side ready to go. If it hear a couple of gib grabbers at my door, shotgun it is. If I hear chaos in the streets and we roving gangs or “operators” with cheap body armor, rifle with green tips it is.
>>62541829Have you perhaps considered having good capacity and also not being stupid? Seems like a good combination.
>>62541870You will never be in an extended fire fight in your life. You will not engage an enemy more than 50 yards away. You will never have to reload in a shootout. The correct way to engage a hostile is using cheating camping ambush methods. And the best gun for that? Shotgun at close range. One shot, barely need to aim, total devastation.
>>62530239Depends on the context of the situation in which I find myself. But for most scenarios, I'm cutting down the barrel of my grandfathers old JC Higgins and loading up all the buckshot I can carry. Appalachian jungle-fighting is going to suck, so I want the simplest tool available for the job
>>62534734>Brand new neverlast glovesNgmi
>>62530239>savage slim jimFor me its the monster tobasco slim jim
>>62541937> You will never be in an extended fire fight in your life.Bro, I will never be in a gunfight in my entire life. But this is a fun ww3 load out thread, and I don’t see why you think a shootout at beyond 50 yards is impossible in fucking ww3. At least an AR with some sort of optic is incredibly usable and effective at 300ish yards AND still being viable at close range. If you’re getting your “shotguns kill in one hit” data from all of the FBI statistics, intermediate rifles also have something like a 75% chance to incapacitate in one hit, that’s still pretty fucking good since I’m not going to stop pulling the trigger. Also, if hiding in a trash can and ambushing someone with a shotgun is ww3 meta, then I don’t need a benelli or a chest rig full of shells, I just need a shockwave and a fucking fannypack.
>>62541937You dont know shit shut up
>>62531039It's so small you'd hardly even notice it
>>62541937>You will never be in an extended fire fight in your life. You will not engage an enemy more than 50 yards away. You will never have to reload in a shootout.But that's the sole reason I keep living. Don't take that hope from me.
