[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20240918_051836.jpg (3.47 MB, 4080x3060)
3.47 MB
3.47 MB JPG
Hey /k/, I recently bought a bryco 58 because I've never seen one before and didn't know what they were. After doing some digging online I hear complaints about the material the frame is made of being weak and shitty, even breaking or blowing off. Is this true, and if it is, how does this happen compared to something that creates significantly more force being accommodated by plastic frames? Pic related, my 10mm glock and the bryco.
>>
>>62531711
Glockknockoff of slides made of steel. Ring of fire gun isnt
>>
>>62531726
Yeah, I more mean the frame. I know the slide actually rides on the steel rails, but even then, I'd imagine a singular piece of ZAMAK would be better than plastic at absorbing force, right?
>>
>>62531711
>bryco 58
Nickel is less durable than polymer. In situations where polymer will flex, nickel will snap.
>>
>>62534210
so your telling me that TUPPERWARE is stronger than STEAL.... what a bunch of BULLCRAP.... theirs a reason that my F150 frame isn't made of PLASTIC...... no wonder you kids cant afford a house at 18 these days....... aint nothin goin on in them heads of yours.....

--Bill

Sent from my Samsung G-975 using Tapatalk



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.