[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1710554689234.jpg (122 KB, 836x1200)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
How many A-100 can Russia put out per year? How many do they realistically need?
>>
>>62539489
do they work while being submerged in water?
>>
File: truck-crash.gif (1.86 MB, 498x274)
1.86 MB
1.86 MB GIF
>>62539489
>Russian final stage of testing
>>
>>62539489
<1
>1
The problem is self evident.
>>
>>62539489
As soon as they get put into use a Patriot will ack them and call it a day
>>
Saaaaar, NATO has no aircraft equivalent to A-100, saaaaaar
>>
>>62539535
I'm still mad about the vodnik being abandonware after being shilled so hard in bad company
>>
>>62539489
Who are the fuckers who keep selling them information gathering equipment for fuck sake
>>
>>62539489
less than one; a lot more than that



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.