[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: GcRRPuPXYAAPjjG.jpg (182 KB, 1080x686)
182 KB
182 KB JPG
Launched on November 6th, 2024
>>
File: GbyH-JMWwBIHgyV.jpg (464 KB, 1880x1160)
464 KB
464 KB JPG
>>62872509
>>
File: GbxlqspWIAk0iVV.jpg_large.jpg (223 KB, 1024x1280)
223 KB
223 KB JPG
>>62872512
Engine info
>>
File: GbyH-JMXQAkLzio.jpg (316 KB, 1880x1160)
316 KB
316 KB JPG
>>62872512
>>
>weapons
>>
>>62872631
All nuclear icebreakers are support vessels as well and under the control of the military
Therefore a military vessel
>>
Who wants to bet it looks as bad as Kuznetsov's engine room inside?
>>
File: 01276647.jpg (204 KB, 700x467)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
>>62872652
Nope
>>
>>62872659
Let's give it a month.
>>
>>62872664
Heres same class after years of use
>>
>>62872652
>>62872664
The northern ports are very important to oligarchs exporting natural resources so ice breakers are well maintained in Russia
>>
>>62872652
Icebreakers are probably the only thing russia can make semi-adequately. Or, more accurately, is forced to make semi-adequately since otherwise basically all their ports bar kaliningrad would be useless in winter. Hence the constant seething over the Baltics and their ports being their own thing.
>>
>>62872674
These are unironically the best kept and most advanced Russian ships
I dont know why nato doesn't have any
>>
>>62872678
NATO has usable warm water ports
>>
>>62872676
Semi? Theyre the only nation on earth to field these ships
>>
>>62872678
why bother with icebreakers if none of your relevant ports/sea routes freeze over
>>
>>62872681
You're telling me this wouldn't be useful for Canada, Denmark and Norway to send supplies to our artic bases?
>>
File: 1725332703006359.jpg (92 KB, 500x357)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>62872678
>>62872687
We do have ice breakers obviously
>>
File: sharecard.jpg (171 KB, 2400x1256)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
>>62872685
Artic bases
>>
File: 1856282363483241.png (785 KB, 1920x1080)
785 KB
785 KB PNG
>>62872509
The main country who might actually benefit from this is China who can bypass any USN blockade by going through the northern route
>>
>>62872687
who fucking cares about canada lmao
>>
>>62872687
I mean Canada alone has 8 as is, and all they're really used for is sending food to snownigs so they can rape each other.
>>
>>62872702
can you just stay in one of the 5 chink shill threads you created instead of shitting up this one? thanks
>>
File: image (1).png (226 KB, 1245x700)
226 KB
226 KB PNG
>>62872699
We need more
>>
>China can bypass any USN blockade by going through Lake HATO
>>
>>62872706
>>62872703
Hey Canada's cool
>>
>>62872714
Until Finland liberates Murmansk we really don't .
Murmansk is pretty much the only major port in the world that requires a fleet of major big ass ice breakers to maintain
>>
File: icebreaker-graphic.jpg (489 KB, 1000x1435)
489 KB
489 KB JPG
>>62872702
Why is china not building any then
>>
>>62872703
Canada might become the next Panama Canal if the ice caps recede further.
>>
>>62872702
>Convoys sailing in constant Arctic daylight in range of countless NATO Arctic airbases
Imagine the raiding
>>
>>62872722
>look up that city
>founded 1915 outside of Finland
Alright buddy
>>
File: Boaty 3.jpg (74 KB, 794x528)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
>>62872723
Boaty.
>>
>>62872723
Because the Russians are building It for them, since this route goes through Russian territorial waters
>>
>>62872738
Russia has more bases and more assets in the Arctic than the NATO or the US all because of their advantage of icebreakers:>>62872723
>>
>>62872792
I know I just think we need more
>>
>>62872509
Interestingly nobody would do anything if it came to Canada and started doing shit here.
>>
>>62872795
Russia has a stupid amount of coast and most of it is frozen. I think you'll find that's why it has more icebreakers than, say, Malta.
>>
>>62872702
>China can break a US blockade by sailing through the Bering Strait
Are you retarded? Do you have brain damage? If China can't bust through Malacca how do you expect them to bust through both Tsushima and the Bering Strait?
>>
>>62872804
Cause k hates canada
>>
>>62872800
That looks remarkably good if you consider that it exploded killing almost everyone and then they sawed the front off it.
>>
>>62872804
technically this icebreaker has no gun and the Hairy Dickwolf class have a 25mm pop gun so somehow the HDW actually wins here
>>
>>62872832
Wait what the fuck theres military icebreakers too?
>>
>>62872839
Why not? It's a big-ass ship that breaks ice. There's nothing about the concept that prevents putting weapons on it.
>>
>>62872848
Never knew
Now can we make em aircraft carriers?
>>
>>62872839
yeag, and if you wanna see the worst procurement failure in modern history go look up what the HDW class cost Canada compared to what the Norwegians payed for the same design
>>
>>62872857
Oh that can't be that- holy fuck Canada
>>
File: Habbakuk.jpg (147 KB, 1272x716)
147 KB
147 KB JPG
Ice boat?
>>
>>62872857
So norways ships cost maybe over 500 million each but Canada's at like 3.5 billion???
>>
>>62872804
This is an unarmed ice breaks so you are correct that no one would do anything assuming it followed local laws
>>
>>62872659
>floor is filthy, panels askew
>dust and grime everywhere
>filthy wooden bench
and it was JUST launched. these so-called "people" have no pride
>>
File: 1661264167318969.jpg (39 KB, 497x498)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>62872885
>>62872870
yep
>but why
the shipyard is owned by one of Canada's handful of oligarchs, the Irving family
>>
>>62872857
That’s not a “failure” but a desired outcome. I don’t know anything about these ships but I’m a Canadian so I know that the overriding requirement is money-laundering, insider trading, graft and/or just welfare for insider-connected business. That’s why Canadian acquisitions strangely end up wildly overpriced in spite of so little capability. Calling it a “failure of the acquisition process in Canada” is just a sufficiently diffuse / generalized problem that the government can pretend to care about the ripoffs without being forced to deal with the real issue.
>>
>>62872885
Yeah, CAD is massively inflated. Don't look any deeper into it
>>
>>62872714

> I made this infographic myself
>>
>>62872965
Yeah looking into this ship? Its got nothing
No missiles nothing
>>
>>62873223
yeah AND
>>
>>62872800
Looking pretty good for a salvaged shipwreck
>>
>>62872832
I love how incompetent the RCN is. I can only imagine how much effort it took for them to even get a 25mm NRWS. They originally wanted them to be completely unarmed. I mean considering its size it should get at least a 57mm Bofors of 76mm OTO Malara, Phalanx, and some sort of SAM even if its just a MANPAD. How the hell are we going to assert our Northern sovereignty when the Russians can just pull up with the Pyotr Velikiy and say "erm akstually this land is ours leaf"
>>
>>62873562
Ohh right i completely forgot to mention the procurement. What a disgrace, we used to be a proper country.
>>62872955
Checked, fuck the Irvings
>>
>>62872723
It bothers me that Lithuania doesn't have any icebreakers.
It bothers me even more that Poland doesn't have any either.
>>
How long till it's launched at?
>>
>>62872873
I had the idea to sprinkle wood chips on melting ice caps to reduce erosion, like how these ice carriers would theoretically be made. Only problem is a shitload of trees would have to be cut down.
>>
>>62873763
2 years?
>>
File: Chukotka.png (1.5 MB, 1025x1279)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB PNG
>>62872517
>>
>>62873768
It would accelerate the ice melting.
>>
>>62872702
Do you know where Alaska is in this image?
>>
>>62873562
>>62873573
the original design from Norway had a 57mm gun and a dual MANPADs launcher, we paid Irving $3.5 billion to figure out how to take those off
>>
>>62873981
It’s European? Is that why it has those module bays? Can’t wait until everyone realizes those don’t work just like the LCS modules didn’t work. The idea is that swapping modules will make getting different capabilities cheap but all that happens is that those cheap modules don’t work.
>>
File: 1729913424491516.jpg (30 KB, 334x372)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>62872670
>mfw thinking of what those poor maintenance techs go through
>>
bros... why do they have so many...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_icebreaker#List_of_nuclear-powered_icebreakers
>>
>>62874171
>why does a country entirely reliant on sea routes frozen half the year have a surplus of icebreakers
it is a mystery
>>
>>62872509
even under heavy sanction Russia is still managed to complete its incredibly expensive nuclear icebreaker. western sanction fail
>>
>>62872800
Looks like the front fell of
>>
>>62872512
Thicc
>>
File: Untitled (1).jpg (99 KB, 1920x1080)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
>>62872512
>>
>>62872885
Norway's ship cost like $65mill in 2002 for procurement alone, the entire fleet of 6 for Canada someonehow got close to CAD 4 billion for procurement and 25 years of maintenance. How the fuck they managed that i dunno
>>
>>62872509
Zero maintenance starts NOW!
>>
>>62872678
We did, once
>>
>>62872678
NATO has submarines
>>
>>62874321
Russia has tigers
>>
>>62874332
Tigers are amphibious? holy fuck
>>
>>62874333
Yes
>>
>>62873562
>can just pull up with the Pyotr Velikiy
That's the neat part, they can't. All of their kirovs are unfit for action as we speak, 3 out of 4 being permanently out of commission.
>>
I am looking forward for Ukies blowing this piece of shit up.
>>
>>62873970
Do you know where Chukotka is in that image? Will the USN dare to intercept both Chinese and Russian ships near Russian territorial borders?
>>
>>62874403
If the USN is imposing a blockade on China they're already fighting a far more formidable opponent and the Russia navy is about as big a factor as North Korea and Iran
>>
>>62872722
But they're fucking cool anon
>>
>>62872509
But it's missing the top?
>>
>>62872674
>>62872676
How selective is it to be selected to serve on an icebreaker? Are icebreaker crews unironically the most competent sailors in the entire Russian Navy?
>>
>>62872723
>Why is china not building any then
They are. They lobbied to become an observer on the Arctic Council for a reason.
>It has built its first indigenously produced icebreaker, has plans for more conventional heavy icebreakers, and is considering investments in nuclear-powered icebreakers too.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/northern-expedition-chinas-arctic-activities-and-ambitions/
>>
>>62873970
Just next to the E.
>>
>>62872676
>>62872683
>Semi? Theyre the only nation on earth to field these ships
Nah, he's right, semi is a good description, they might have invented the nuclear icebreaker but when they tried to build a new class of conventional ones they failed so hard they abandoned it and ordered the next two in germany
>>
>>62874403
Let's assume the US won't sink Chinese ships in Russian territorial waters. How are the Chinese getting past the Tsushima Strait?
>>
>>62874589
That's Yemen, silly.
>>
>>62874338
i forgot cats are great swimmer. it's so over for HATO
>>
>>62872509
A lot of women in that crowd. Wonder where all the men are?
>>
>>62874695
Lets hope they dont get into S P A C E
>>
Weapons?
>>
File: PXL_20230909_150355676~4.jpg (470 KB, 1375x1650)
470 KB
470 KB JPG
>>62872832
>>62872857
>>62872965
>>62873499
>>62873562
>>62874240

Hey I'm posted to the Hairy D. AMA
>>
>>62872631
Shut the fuck up, moron. We need these.
>>
>>62872936
Wood is light, /k/omrade. Make buoyancy.
>>
>>62874747
Where do you goon?
>>
>>62874710
>hehe we build a ship)) puccia stronc)))
watch them not shut up about this particular piece for the next 5 years, desperately clawing for western approval
>>
>>62872853
Unironically based. Then deploy them South.
TOTAL PENGUIN DEATH.
Willy Pete those flightless fucks.
>>
>>62872800
I bet they pulled the missiles out of those tubes and put them back into service.
>>
>>62872723
No ice between communist china and the Republic of China. The PLAN is being purpose built for that invasion.
>>
>>62872652
nah, not yet. give it a few years of subhuman crews..
>>
>>62873744
>Polan
Polan can only into river icebreakers (25 in total) and does not need oceanic ones
>>
>>62872509
>>62872512
>>62872517
>>62872624
implessivski, comrade vatnik
>>
>>62874645
>ordered the next two in germany
>country that never uses icebreakers builds better icebreakers than country that uses them regularly
You can't make this shit up.
>>
File: 1731703385968518.jpg (270 KB, 1080x686)
270 KB
270 KB JPG
>>
>>62872512

the anchors were embezzled already
>>
>>62875108
Huh
Looks cool
>>
>>62874645
Thats not true?
Why are you making stuff up anon
>>
>>62872664
>>62872652
>Let's give it a month.
Its civilian nuclear ship its crew and corporate culture is 9000 light years away from Russian military.
>>
>>62872678
NATO aren't losers so we're capable of holding warm water ports
>>
>>62872512
saddest larp that ever larped
>>
>>62872517
>small amount of liquid radioactive waste
>small
>you trust us, its we we small
>>
>>62872512
>that flag
literal puke
>>
>>62872676
>Icebreakers are probably the only thing russia can make semi-adequately.
Huge majority of their conventional icebreakers are Finnish made or Finnish designs made in Russia under license. Full of systems imported from the west. Couple of their nuclear icebreakers were made in FInland, aside from nuclear power systems. Even during peak of Soviet Union, they imported virtually all of their specialized ships, mostly from Finland and Poland, because military projects too all their naval architects attention. Most civilian ships they made themselves were small and serially produced stuff like coastal freighters, river freighters and trawlers. They made plenty of their own icebreakers during Soviet era, but when that shit show ended up in bankruptcy, they retired pretty much all conventional Soviet designed icebreakers because those sucked.

>>62874645
Its even funnier because sanctions derailed that shit, they are trying to build those icebreakers by themselves. Its funny because they have to make their own marine diesels, control systems and basically every single subsystem on those boats. Their schedule is slightly optimistic, they are literally going get their diesels from a locomotive engine manufacturer. Company that might be competent in building engines 10th of the size used on ships.

>>62875048
Germans didn't design those ships, they do have competent shipyards to build them.
>>
>>62874747
I've seen this photo before. You want to continue this on /cangen/. Did they really let you take a personal firearm with you. I thought the CAF would be too gay to ever let that happen?
>>
>>62872509
>>62872517
is it a new reactor? surprised it hasn't become losttech
>>
File: 1000005540.jpg (2.07 MB, 4032x2268)
2.07 MB
2.07 MB JPG
>>62874761
In one of the plentiful heads onboard.

>>62875720
Yeah I posted it there before. That was one sail last year and it was supposed to be for a skeet shoot but we ended up taking them ashore. It was the most based thing I've done in the navy and the skipper definitely got in shit for allowing it.
>>
I am very impressed! Russia is surely a very strong country!
>>
>>62875630
Some absolutely retardedly high percentage of all icebreakers on the planet are either made in Finland or designed in Finland. For some reason Finland poured all the concentrated autism in the country onto icebreakers. Just going off of memory it was something like 60% or 80% of all icebreakers ever made that can trace their roots back into Finland.
>>
>>62875048
more like they will build and fix your shit for a hefty price tag but that's still cheaper and faster than your own shipyard that will embezzle 90% of the money kek
>ynr a russian shipyard scamming India of all countries

>>62875200
>Thats not true?
>Why are you making stuff up anon
It is, check out Project MPSV06, they stopped work on Spasatel Petr Gruzinskiy shortly after laying the keel in 2010 when the shipyard claimed that you cannot build shit based on the documentation provided
Might explain why the two ones build in 2013-2015 by Nordic Yards in Germany "Murman" and "Beringov Proliv" were called modified MPSV06-NY class instead
I have good news for you though, they restarted work on the abandoned one, renamed it "Kerchenskiy Proliv" and claimed it will be finished this year, but given how that goes we have a solid chance that the other two will celebrate a decade in service before it sets off on its maiden voyage

>>62875630
>Its even funnier because sanctions derailed that shit, they are trying to build those icebreakers by themselves
True, they tried to /diy/ them again with the MPSV06M but the delivery was already postponed by 2 years to no ones surprise
>they are literally going get their diesels from a locomotive engine manufacturer. Company that might be competent in building engines 10th of the size used on ships.
>inb4 they just slap 10 locomotive engines together, smekalka kek
>>
>>62876741
Its a mystery.
>>
>>62872659
What's with Russians and that soviet green and grey white anyway. Is this because they have a DNA deficiency not getting them the full spectrum?
>>
File: Soviet_Znamya_Pobedy.png (71 KB, 1920x960)
71 KB
71 KB PNG
>>62872512
>Donetsk/Luhansk flags despite having literally nothing to do with this Icebreaker
Have the DPR/LPR flags become the modern day equivalent of the Victory Banner? Being such a glorious reminder of Rossiya Stronk and mass casualties that they'll stick it onto anything no matter how irrelevant to remind people of it?
>>
>>62872631
seethe
>>
>>62872631
>>weapons
>What is Project 23550
>>
Question: How much of this ship was designed or built before the collapse of the Soviet Union?
>>
>>62873744
why the fuck would we need an ice breaker in litho?
>>
>>62879401
How about because of >>62876908
>>
>>62874710
Maybe they're the wives of the crew
>>
>>62874660
>confusing Yemen with Saaaaar Lanka
The state of this thread...
>>
>>62880149
we don't need a dedicated ice-breaker for the ice we get in our one (1) port
these days we have to chase off any ice-fishers that dare to try and go on it, any old boat can break its own path (if by chance we do, we will ask latvia)
>>
>>62876908
When the fuck was this image made, 1850?
I have not seen ice thick enough to impede a rowboat in the southern blue area in my lifetime.
>>
>>62872509
Considering alot of Russian harbours and docks are not ice free large parts of the year this might be necessary for them
>>
>>62883450
Incredible insight anon
>>
>>62883441
The Danish straits froze enough to require icebreakers multiple times in the 80s and once in the 90s. Doubt I'll get to experience it again in my lifetime, though. Maybe once the AMOC collapses.
>>
>>62877008
Yes. It's hilarious because they drafted and killed most of men from that area in meat assaults.
>>
File: 1612381081075.gif (2.45 MB, 500x229)
2.45 MB
2.45 MB GIF
>>62872702
>shipping routes
>through the suez
lol "existing route" lmfao
>>
whats life like on a nuclear ice-breaker?
sounds like it could be a 'comfy' job
>>
>>62872676
How dare you mention that BBC Puccia is moderately competent at something you fucking vatnik scum.
>>
>>62886763
Despite pols cope, traffic is currently transiting the canal
>>
>>62886836
>Despite pols cope, traffic is currently transiting the canal
at significantly, dramatically lower tonnage
>-60% of the gross tonnage that used to transit the strait pre-war

suez transits were $trillion dollar/annual economic impact, that has essentially been decimated
>>
>>62872509
>/k/ is a board devoted to weapons, military equipment, and icebreakers

What an age we live in.
>>
>>62886854
(you)
>>
>>62886858
your absolute seethe is palpable
>>
>>62886858
It’s military equipment. Cry tourist
>>
>>62872700
Lol. What map is this from? The three sites in Canada don't represent any air bases.
>>
>>62872509
>inb4 towed back home and a USN sub sneaks up behind it and takes air samples confirming a reactor accident again
>>
>>62886873
(((them)))
>>
>>62886890
>>62888030
Seething brownoid detected
>>
File: 1520158156570.jpg (32 KB, 698x400)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
>>62872723
MR PRESIDENT WE MUST NOT ALLOW AN ICEBREAKER GAP
>>
>>62872678
Because only Canada has the geography to warrant such a thing, and we're a fucking dumpster fire of a country that has no future.
>>
>>62872735
No, it won't.
The northwest passage will be the last of the northern routes to open up. Russia will get the initial surge of traffic as the northeast passage will be the first to open and they have a fleet to support it. Butt once the transpolar route is available everything will switch to that, and there is no reason to switch to the northwest passage.
>>
>>62872509
>>62872512
>>62872517
>>62872624
You got nothing on us Moskals.
>>
File: baltic.png (256 KB, 829x447)
256 KB
256 KB PNG
>>62883441



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.