why do they only have 6 companies + HQ ?that's barely 2 batallions without support assets not a regiment
What kind of tooth-to-tail ratio am I looking at?
what kind of poorfag thing is this?2 atgms per company?
>>62879953like the us has 2 per platoon plus idk if they also have a weapons or at platoon at company level with even more javelins, plus the javelin is man portable although heavy as shit, and shoulder fired, the akeron seems to be only fired from tripod
but if they're preparing for conventional war why is the base block regiments that will go on to assemble a batallion tactical group?conventional war is fought with multiple brigades and divisions not batallions
>>62879933Unironically because the French are capable of winning counter insurgencies with little more than 5000 solders https://youtu.be/dT5U-JQ8Puw?feature=shared
>>62879933Because the french army usually organizes its forces in GTIAs, which are formed by troops from multiple regiments. Basically their entire army is a giant pool of capabilities which are then task organized. Its a different force design.What exactly their plan for full on conventional conflict is, idk. Probably throw all nukes at their adversary.
>>62880498>Basically their entire army is a giant pool of capabilities which are then task organized.Isnt how basically all armies are designed?
>>62880915no slot of armies have units with a given structure and that's how they're used
