Why did Nasa stop funding HARP project? They could send projectiles to the ionosphere, imagine what applications this could have if they kept funding it : drones shooting at satellites, intercepting satellite data..>in 4 it was too expensiveThey are about to send humans on the moon again, i think they could have used some of that budget to build a big gun hidden in a mountain
shoot once and everyone knows where it is. earth has to rotate into position to fireless payload than rockets
>>62880825the future is harp guns shooting from one side of the planet to the other, in an infinite proxy war
>>62880876>shoot once and everyone knows where it isThey still wont have the capacities to reach it, assuming its protected by AD systems and can be hidden by an elevator under 6 geological layers>earth has to rotate into position to fire less payload than rocketsIts potentially less expensive than rockets
2 hard 2 make rockets gun proof
>>62880825>stop
>>62880876also what can survive a rocket launch is more broad than what can survive a gun launch.
with reusable rockets, it's probably not much cheaper to use it for cargo delivery.it'd be better for bombardment duties with guided projectiles.
>>62880876>earth has to rotate into position to fireI think that's absolutely amazing
