Has the BUK shown itself to be the absolute worst AA system on the planet? Or is it just Russian incompetence?
>>62892249Maybe it hasn't been updated much compared to other stuff like Pantsirs?
>>62892300Pantsir is also dogshit
>>62892304Pantsir is a good system now.
>>62892249BUK will btfo PantSIR every day of the week
Tor is definately worse. At least Ukrainians shot some stuff with their own BUKs.https://x.com/OSINTWarfare/status/1858892149653225564
>>62892323>Pantsir is a good system now.what
At least the longer range stuff is surviving better.
>>62892343Never fails to make me kek
>>62892249I don't know that you mean, it can successfully shoot down passenger airliners
>>62892249That's what you get for not taking yo thong out yo bussy, playa
>>62892249>worst AA system on the planet?> Or is it just Russian incompetence?It can be both.
>>62892249In 2014, it killed 298 people (probable mercenaries) in one fell swoop. Tell me another AA system with that kind of power.
>>62892323Lmaohttps://youtu.be/q9CMcfQ8-aw?si=_qcF0MFKySL_WHq9
>>62892249Buk has proven itself to be fine in this war. It's an aging system but considering how shit the air forces involved in this are, they do a good job,The Pantsir on the other hand has proven itself to be dogshit in yet another war.
>>62892249Considering the thing should have been retired in the 90s, and struggles whenever used on its own and not integrated with higher level air defense radar and command i would say it hasn't done too bad.For both sides it helps deny medium to high altitude airspace to the enemy closer to the frontline then S-300/S-400 can be deployed, if nothing else it forces aircraft into altitude for short range SAM and MANPADS.
