>Camo:I sleep>Ghillie:i sleep>Tunnels:i sleep>Night raids:i sleep>Stealth on aircraft:i sleep>Submarines:I sleep>Disguising as the enemy:Warcrime
>>62897529>perfidity adjacent shit vs cover
>>62897536>Actual strategy vs cover
>>62897529>>Camo:I sleep>>Ghillie:i sleep>>Tunnels:i sleep>>Night raids:i sleep>>Stealth on aircraft:i sleep>>Submarines:I sleepdon't be seen>>Disguising as the enemy:Warcrimeviolate the one thing that guarantees your rights as a combatant
>>62897690>>Camo:I sleep>>>Ghillie:i sleep>>>Tunnels:i sleep>>>Night raids:i sleep>>>Stealth on aircraft:i sleep>>>Submarines:I sleep>don't be seenKill before the enemy does>>>Disguising as the enemy:Warcrime>violate the one thing that guarantees your rights as a combatantKill before the enemy does.The right as a... dont matter if they already droned you.
>>62897769So warcrimes are fine if you kill the opponent? An interesting assessment
>>62897769the problem is that wearing fake disguises forces the enemy to adopt a shoot first ask questions later policy that leads to friendly fire and civilian casualties. which leads to retaliation, and now both sides to live constantly on edge.you gain a small tactical advantage for a short time period then pay the price yourself later. it's preferable for both sides to not start this, so in most conflicts they don't. it's like chemical weapons usage. sure you can win an engagement but then the enemy will start using chemical weapons back, which means everybody has to be constantly on the lookout for poison gas, great job.
>>62897791Incidentally, this is why tear gas is banned from offensive use but is fine for riot control. The fear was, a tear gas attack would be seen as an attack with serious weapons, and there would be retaliation in kind. It’s mostly irrelevant now, because major countries have so much red tape that by the time you get to someone who can authorize your VX or sarin or ricin or whatever other nastiness you have, it’ll be clear that it was tear gas used against you. But it’s still international law.
>>62897529>what if we made rules about war?>"can one of them be not to kill each other?">no, but we will restrict HOW you can kill each other!>"ok how will it be enforced?">the winner of the war will decide your punishment
>commit perfidy haha wow that was easy, stupid pigs never seen me coming!>they commit perfidy in retaliationhow could they do this, what cowards, I cannot believe this has happenedliteral nigger behavior, no future thinking just act in the moment
>>62897529Some rules are better than none, /pol/.
disguising as the enemy causes problems for everyone, its not worth it.
