Why are conservatives terrified beyond words that little gay boys will be allowed to dance around in costumes in public places for an audience? Why does this particular activity terrify them so?
>>35536931Slay
Shitty parents see their children as property and extensions of themselves, so they can't process the idea that their kids could be gay and freak out.
>>35536931I’m not for all this but if it’s within a closed environment “not in public” then idc.
>>35536931they only like little girls to do the even more extreme thing (beauty peagants).Really sexist of them
>>35537123Are people scared by the idea of some kids being gay?
>>35537192that is sexist
I hate beauty pageants, I hate parents filming their gay kids twerking, I hate children being robbed of that short golden period where they don't have to worry about sex and sexual preferences and this shitty cumbrained society adults live in. That was the only time in my life where everyone could be friends in good faith and didn't have to worry that they're just being rizzed or that someone is trying to get in their pants. This is prob why discrete coming of age events are a thing in literally every historical society.
>>35538469If it's them playing with other kids not in public that's fine. Like when I wore my friend's sisters costumes for fun as a 7 year old lateshit. But don't try to frame that as being the same as desmond is amazing, in the OP, who danced for adults at a gay bar as an 11 year old. Obvious sexualization of minors like that is what everyone gets upset about. >gay boysI'm going to ignore why you're using sexual orientation descriptors for little boys
>>35538666here's your (You), satan. can I go home now?
>>35536931https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/gay-couple-charged-with-molesting-their-adopted-sons-and-pimping-them-out/news-story/d0a54e4637ebffd68e37866a86d400b0
>>35539205and what's that to do with boys dancing around in public?
>>35539219so you're really gonna act like gay men don't encourage stuff like the video you posted because they gets exual gratification from it
>>35539242yeah
>>35538654yeah drag is inherently sexual and not for kids
I guess the funny part to me is that he's dressed as modestly as possible and you still see it as only sexual, you see no artistic merit whatsoever. It seems like you want to sexualize maleness but have some tension over whether that's ok. To me, I see a little gay boy having fun, and there's nothing sexual about it at all.
haven't you always wanted a monkeeeee
>>35536931As a gay dude I say leave the damn kids alone
>>35539458nobody is hurting kids except conservatives who want boys banned from dancing in public if they are too gay acting