>mtfs lose chasers if they aren't feminine enough>ftms lose chasers for becoming to masculinewe are not the same
>>36322347higher production value poon art i've ever seen (unless they're just forfeiting the mspaint style art entirely)
>>36322363>higherhighest*
>>36322347lol no i found a chaser that was specifically attracted to me for being masculinei blocked him because that felt gross but as a manmoder it's not like i'm gonna find love from any other types of people
>>36322437as in he specifically liked non passing trans womeni know i don't remotely pass but i at least want someone to want me for my twinkish aspects and not the part of me i hate the most
>>36322347FtM chasers don't really exist. It is regular tomboy appreciation.
>>36322437>i blocked him because that felt grossComplaining about being fetishized is the most female thing ever.
>>36322462FtM chasers exist and they are literal barrel scrape. Some of the most low-tier cumbrained males ever.
>>36322462some people who once fucked an ftm become chasers
>>36322495i feel you and that anon are talking about the same thing. the people who find masculinity a downside but chase pooners for pussy obviously do exist, and they are low value as a result of being prison gay
>>36322347Not true.Pooners are desired for practical reasons. They are a man who can do chores and fix cars while also being able to carry children.Troons are pure vanity. Beauty without children. Brains without strength. Worthless.Or that's what most people think anyways because most people take a more practical approach to relationships.
>>36322559imagine your pregnant poonerhusband doing chores when his water breaks and his phallo ruptures
>>36322559>Pooners are desired for practical reasons. They are a man who can do chores and fix cars while also being able to carry children.this literally is complete projection. literally where is this coming from???? queer people are notoriously promiscuous, since hookups are so easy to come by, so for every one queer who only puts out in monogamy, there are 10 just slutting it up. your complete nonsense """"""practical"""""" garbage that is literally only relevant in a relationship is completely forfeit to virtually every queer, ever. plus, no one dates with "practicality" in mind. i am too lazy to even give your examples (even mentioning pregnancy) the individual time of day. just, again, ridiculous projecting post, pretending it's feasible you speak for anyone else, let alone everyone else
>>36322559I'm not dating anyone who can't do chores and expects me to do most of them
>>36322347I like early transition FtMs because I like to see them become more masculineSame for MtFs but I cant stand being around the emotional bullshit of an early-mid transition transfemI just have a transformation fetishFeeder and gymbro stuff kinda does it for me too but in all cases I only really get into it if I'm there from the start
Why are all ftm chasers straight men who want pre/early-T ftms for easy pussy? Where are the ones who actually like masculinity? Do they even exist?
>>36322628>this literally is complete projectionNope
>>36322678"both" in this case usually means "fem""trans man only" in this case usually means "I am a predatory chaser and not actually queer"
>>36322718>do you like onions or garlic >both>ok so this usually means you like onions are you retarded?
>>36322678that’s ropefuel
>>36322678Why does this poll say I should try to date lesbians when everything else seems to indicate it's male chasers who are the most common
>>36322804Males of all ages greatly outnumber young lesbians
>>36322804>Why does this poll say I should try to date lesbiansit doesn't say that
>>36322347but at the same timeif we aren't masculine enoughthen we're ackshually just retarded gurlz!
