my ribcage feels and looks massive. im 36" underbust pretty much to the bone at 169cm.what's the cutoff? when do you become a ribhon?
>>36371914is your rib cage disproportionately bigger than your body
>>36371914ur a ribhont. 170cm with 36" underbustwe're twins!
>>36371914hmm i'm 6'2 with 31 inch
170cm38 inch
>>36371981ur honestly cute dakotastay winningi wish i looked endearing in the way u do instead of looking like a bitchy twink (which is basically what i am ig)
183cm / 6'1" tall38 inch underbustBut I'm also very overweight. Hopefully my underbust shrinks once I lose 80 lbs.
>>36371914shit that pic is what dysphoria feels like for sure
>>363719145'4 afab with a 32 inch ribcage, it's huge and i have problems fitting in womens clothing
>>36372134bro how
more bdd posting? oh goodie (mtf)
>>36371914i'm 32 at 173 and i feel like not terrible but still bad
>>36371914my underbust is 31" at 5'8" which is not great but also not terrible. I'm a fat fuck 165 pounder so my hope is I can still lose a bit
>>3637191432" at 184cm/6 foot 0.5in am i a hon hehehehehehe im a hon guys im definitely not fishing for compliments hehehehehehe hahahaha noooooo i will NEVER pass hehehe proceedes to post enormous tits (C cups btw)
>>3637191436' isn't great but tbqh it's more about proportions and how your ribcage looks compared to your hips and lower body. you could have a ribcage measurement that sounds big on paper but if your hips are wider then it's not really a big deal, equally you could have a relatively small ribcage circumference but be built like a fridge with no waist or hips.
>>36373211Could you please link the website you used for this? Thanks!
>>36373292https://fallingforpropaganda.github.io/Bonepill-website/ANSUR 1
>>36371914186cm28” underbustc:
31 at 175cm. It's one of the qualities of my appearance that I'm the least comfortable about, because I feel like women's clothing just isn't really designed for it. In theory, it doesn't look that high compared to what it could've been, but it feels massive and I hate it and it makes me want to die.
>>36373351really not bad, civilian data example in cm
>>36373351pretty much exact same measurements and i'm in the same boat lol it sounds okay on paper especially since my other measurements are decent but it feels huge and like women's clothing fits it awkwardly. there is also an element of doom about it just because it's largely unchangeable, at least if you don't like parts of your face for example you can change that with surgery but you're kinda stuck with your ribcage. makes me worry i'll never feel totally comfortable with my appearance.
>>36373443That chart takes into account cis woman boob sizes though, which I do not have. It doesn't look too bad in terms of where it falls statistically, but it feels very bad when I see it in a mirror. Especially from side angles when I see my ribcage jutting out over my waist. All I can really do is dress in baggy tops and sweaters to hide it, and then it looks kinda fine.
>>36373524Underbust does not include boobUnderbust is below boob (lit. "under" "bust"/"boob")
>>36373541Ah right, fair enough, I'm stupid. Still, it doesn't really take away that I can visually tell that my ribcage is disproportionally large compared to that of cis women.
>>36373546No it isnt, you just have body dysmorphia
>>36371914There’s no cutoff. Does it look disproportionate, that’s all there is to it.Also, breadth is more important than circumference and is what you’re looking at in the mirror.
>>36371914I'm 38" at 165cm/5'5"I have DDs which help a bit but they're still wide set unfortunately