>June is over>still no TERF AI appwill radfems ever deliver?
>>36379452i can't wait til it starts clocking terfs
>>36379452>99.85%what about the renaining 0.15%?what about their beloved, well-respected detransitioners?
>>36379452Lol last I checked the ai algorithm they use for this is shit, chances are if you have long hair it'll think you're a woman
>>36379506link to the AI?
>>36379506he got clocked as a tranny by the same model
>>36379452>heat emissionswatYou know just because I disagree with GC people doesn't mean I like to see them grifted.
>I dont understand! Why does my app keep telling ME, that I'm trans>I created this app yet it tells me I have masculine features like a *spits on the ground* tranny>I look nothing like a tranny!>I'm a rael bioloogical wooman!
>>36379515Don't remember what it was called sorry, was like well over a month ago Maybe it's "improved" since then but even if so you can't rely on an algorithm for this kinda stuff
>>36379718there could not be a worse example of a person creating this appself awareness in these women doesn't exist
>>36379718why are 9/10 terfs incredibly masculine and ugly, and 1/10 terfs objectively very attractive
>>36380927What??
>>36380927There are two types of TERF, by far the most common are cishons, they're angry that they don't pass and that awareness of trannies has raised the bar to pass. These aren't real terfs, they wouldn't care if they were less ugly. In the minority are truTerfs, they're terfs because they represent the peak of femininity and are dedicated to defending it from those who would try to claim its majesty
>>36379718literally looks like a boymoding chvdjak.Do you think that they're they bitter b.c. they're a repper or were they once a normie cisles that got mistaken for a tranny one too many times??My theory is that the hot terfs lean towards the first one and the ugly terfs lean towards the latter. cf J.K. Rowling. Detransitioners are an exception ofc
>>36381045>>36381057Sorry troons but you can easily tell in real life
>>36379452>Women can't into technologyWhat?! No way.
>>36379691males emit more heat
>>36379452They haven't yet programmed an AI that doesn't give false positives.
>>36379718
>>36381156I once had a trans-inclusionary radical feminist (TIRF?) get mad at me for saying sports are segregated because men are physically stronger/faster/more durable than women so she asked me to name one measurable thing men are better than women at so I said men produce more body heat and linked a research article and she said "this article is from the 2000's it's out of date" I hate feminists so much it's unreal
>>36381437ok but did the study include any trans people because trans wmn are real wmn and so their body temp matters 2?
