Now sex is a social construct too??? You trannies are insane.
The sex and gender of every "trans woman" on earth is male.Their identity is merely a delusional fiction.
i like playing mine craft becuase its a social construct (you build stuff togeher)
Rape is a social construct
>>37732446i don't think it's a social construct itself but some of the qualities we apply probably are
>>37732446spoiler alert: she is not well-adjusted
>>37732446reminder that the only reason people started differentiating this is so nonbinies could have fun with their le gender and feel special while still ankering their identity on their sex
>>37732446How exactly would sex be a social construct? Before I even knew what sex was because I was a dumb kid, I knew I wanted 3rd grade and 4th grade girls. If you had asked a kid that age what sex was, they'd probably tell you it is something cool like transformers or like adults hugging
>>37732446Bruh this is the same mentally ill transbian who thinks all men are evil and every man accused of rape should be murdered in public even without evidence
>>37732446Pretty much all biological categories are social constructs. They're reductive models for understanding a much more complex physical reality.
>>37732500>everything is a social construct which means I can twist them to mean anything I want
>>37732507Not what I said retard
>>37732495Rape is a social construct
>>37732513Now tell me, are mtf trannies biologically males or not?
>>37732546depends on whether they've transitioned or not
>>37732546now tell me why do you cum when i shove a finger up your ass
>>37732546Yes, socially male as well. Trans women are delusional schizophrenic men who cannot reason with reality.
>>37732456This. Trans people have to bend over backwards to force others to view things their way and then threaten suicide when people burst their delusional bubbles
>>37732521TRVKE
>>37732446>sex is biological>gender is perceivedI don't understand how some people don't understand this.
>>37732594"gender dysphoria" means you are threatening suicide to get your way
Cross sex hormones don’t change your chromosomes. You’re just a male emulating what it means to be female with medical intervention.
>>37732602>>gender is perceivedthats nbphobic chud
>>37732446You troons destroyed the whole lgbt community
>>37732621Trans people have singlehandedly set back gay acceptance by decades.Many more people are ok with a law that says you can't fire people from their job for coming out, but those same people would not support a law that says you ALSO have to call a man in a dress a woman.
>>37732612NTA, but I'm pretty trans people aren't trying to threaten suicide to get their way into Harvard. Occam's Razor: gender dysphoria makes people suffer enough to want to die. Simple as.
>>37732621>t. cishet man
>>37732472It's spelled 'anchoring'Like anchor
>>37732446tell it to judith butler
>>37732763No one cares.
>>37732770You're going to remember I said this, and I don't care if you pretend not to careYou learned something and that's what I wanted
>>37732779Did I ask? NoDo I give a fuck? NoAre you my personal spell checker? I don't remember hiring you
>>37732763ze teutonic spirit shines through me
>>37732801I'm a volunteer
>>37732808You volunteer to tongue my ass
>>37732829Don't mind if I do
>>37732638Trying to police thought and speech and forcing the general population to view men as women is literally insanity
>>37732941it's insanity to think that's what happening
>>37732964You can literally lose your job if you don't worship trannies at your workplace
>>37732964That Dylan creep is a dude larping as a woman and people get called transphobic for calling it out. You’re forced to play pretend with these people or lose your livelihood
>>37732973>>37732982i wish this would be actually happening <3
>>37732982How do you feel about people are forcing you to think Israel is a country? Just curious.
>>37733018Don’t deflect. Stop trying to police thought you fascist. Trans women are men
>>37732982>>37732973Found the 40 year old divorced dad whose brain stopped updating 15 years ago lmao
>>37732456By that standard all identities are 'delusional fiction' aside from a literal list of the atomic elements your body is made of
>>37733034So you agree no one should be forced to view trans women as women right? Or do you want to police thought and speech??
>>37733049most trans people dont care if some random ass jobless middle aged bum thinks they are male
>>37733018The same liberals who push transgender shit? You guys want palis dead cause they're not pro LGBT.
>>37733058Oh yeah then what about those cases where trannies forced the companies to fire people over pronouns bulls hit
>>37733058You say that as if they don’t screech that misgendering is literal violence. Maybe you’re not aware of how shit your community is because you never leave your mother’s basement
>>37733018Trannies worship IsraelThe fuck you on about
>>37733058Lol
>>37733058you are male, we don't just think it, it's your physical state
>>37733072>someone bullies other employees>gets fired:3>>37733073do you get mad when someone call you a girl?
>>37733107I got misgendered over the phone the other day. The woman called me a ma'am, but I am a feminine man. It doesn't happen often, but it has happened multiple times. It's awkward, but I wouldn't say it makes me mad.
>>37732456sure chud, if you think science is invalid this stance is correct
>>37733107>>someone bullies other employees>>gets firedIt's okay when you bully others into playing along with your delusions?
>>37733107No and I also don’t self harm when being misgendered because I’m not crazy
>>37733085imo its funny if people who are obessed with us existing are misgendering us <3>>37733086ok?
>>37733123The same science that labeled homosexuality as mental illness and validated many nazi delusions from phrenology to eugenics back in the day?Le science changes its opinion based on the change in culture.
>>37733137So you’re stupid. Got it
>>37733122i meant intentionally>>37733126yea its okay and i can totally do that because trannies have so much power>>37733132neither do it
>>37733137trans women are male men you deliver mail
>>37733083lol delusipnal boomer faggot please find some peace before you pass from this life
>>37733155wouldnt transwomen be the kitty cats that attack the male man ><
>>37733152t. illiterate that couldn't even define p-value in his own wordskeep changing the subject if it helps you cope. science has gone through just as many incredible revolutions as the industrial revolution, the invention of computers etc... i honestly feel bad for brainlets like yout. STEM PhD
>>37733132> just do it slowly like they did for gay people!yeah no we're good... not waiting 50 years for the illiterate christcucks to catch up. they're irrelevant in today's society anyway... it's all asians and high iq trans women running companies like NVidia and MSoft etc. anyway
>>37732446I rang the alarm bell on this months ago and the faggots of this hellsite told me I was being schizo. Yes, trannies really are pushing the same "sex=gender" shit they were ardently fighting against just a few years ago.
>>37733304You think people don’t view trans women because of religion? This is the same mental gymnastics and boogeyman you always come up with. People don’t view trans women as women because they’re male. They’re men who pump themselves up with cross sex hormones. They’re not real women. You have to force people to view them as real women which is so weird
>>37733154Oh I think it was intentional. Its pretty clear im a fem gay man.
>>37733304I wonder why people don’t view trans women as women….. hmmm surely it’s religion and not something else
>>37733315there's nothing schizo about acknowledging that sex being simplified down to 2 categories when it isn't quite that simple is a social construct>>37733328i dont identify as a woman chuddy boi -- and yes, it's almost always christcucks crying the loudest about this.> they're malecool bro write a blog about it i really don't care about your opinion. i'd probably see you, and think "wow, dysgenic trash" to myself and move on with my day. you are 100% irrelevant and illiterate. your arguments are based on social concensus because you're low iq
>>37733346> hrt does nothing to change how you lookmf isn't just illiterate but retarded toobless you anon, i hope you can make it in this life with that pathetic excuse for a brain.
>>37733278> illiterate that couldn't even define p-value in his own wordsEveryone knows about p-value. Now learn about p-hacking. You can stop being a smug pretentious fuck. Your blind faith in science itself is ascientific. You'll never know when another paradigm shift will happen.
>>37732446Literally everything in the universe is a "social construct" if you're retarded and bad faith enough
>>37733351Hrt doesn’t change your chromosomes buddy. You’re still a male presenting as female.
>>37733361>Now learn about p-hackingi did, as part of my phd. you can stop pretending to understand what that means, and arbitrarily applying it to every finding you don't like lmao> You can stop being a smug pretentious fuck.nah, stop being retarded and arrogant.> Your blind faith in science itself is ascientificstudying mathematics and statistics at one of the world's best universities isn't exactly "blind faith" but to an illiterate i can see how it would beyou don't even have the slighest clue of what you don't know. true ignorance.> You'll never know when another paradigm shift will happen.lol.> Hrt doesn’t change your chromosomes buddy. You’re still a male presenting as female1. i didnt mention my sex or gender. rent free.2. you can't see people's chromosomes, schizo
>>37733393>you can't see people's chromosomes, schizoYou can see how it expresses itselfYou have no vagina(real one) cause you got male chromosomes
>>37733393
>>37733409>>37733413> i believes what i sees with my eyes > argues about "science"low iq monkey, you aren't worth my time
>>37733362good faith is a social construct retard
>>37733413imagine having this saved on your pccompletely unhinged behaviorpls see a psychiatrist at your earliest convenience (i doubt you're very busy)
>>37732446been saying this the whole time. bigotted cis people tried to give you gender as a consolation prize to hide their inability to accept the reality of a sex change.so many people will say they're supportive, but invalidate your sex change by reducing you to the sex you were assigned at birth regardless of phenotypical expression.
>>37733431
>>37733431Imagine thinking women can have male anatomy. LOL
>>37733449> 9th grade sciencewoah anon you'e blown my mind and deboonked every peer-reviewed paper on this topic in neurology and genetics with this imagegood lord GET THIS MAN HIS NOBEL PRIZE RIGHT NOW
>>37733431Better than believing "experts" funded by jews
>>37733474> muh p-hacking!> actually it's just conspiracy theoriesagain, good luck surviving in the modern world with that miniscule object you're calling your brain, anon. i have a lecture to get to.
>>37733464If you have a dick you're a manIf you have a vagina you're a womanIf you're fucked up in there you're intersexSo simple and intuitive. We've got through most of human history using this standard without a problemm You just want to change the definition so that you can enter women's spaces.
>>37733468cais are male
>>37733495>We've got through most of human historymf just using fallacies now without blinking an eye>>37733503like i said.... you don't even know what you don't know. pathetic. i was not referring to intersex conditions whatsoever.
>>37733495>You just want to change the definition so that you can enter women's spacesif you're so concerned about privacy and safety you'd advocate for single stalls, instead of hating on trans people.again -- haven't even mentioned my sex or gender identity but you're foaming at the mouth about trans women... so tiresome. so low IQ.
>>37733576we should have mixed-sex nudity instead, it is ok for men and women to be naked together in one big room without walls
>>37733597if that's what you're into, anon. personally i don't (and never have) gotten naked around strangers... it's a rather weird obsession that cis people seem to have
>>37733623its not an obsession its less sexually charged and weird than having segregation isend segregation NOWyou are a backwards moral puritan conservative
>>37733038not identity per se, just your self-identification. if a guy molests a 5 year old girl his identity would then include the clause of being a sex offender and pedophile and should be treated by society as such. when you say "i'm a girl now teehee" you don't really change anything about yourself or the world around you.
>>377336352/10 for effort i guess
>>37733672> anon's mind just randomly wanders to molesting childrenfascinating stuff bro
>>37733361>because weve gained better understanding over time and scientific consensus has changed over time means I wont listen or trust any expert on any subject ever if it contradicts my political idealogy>my political idealogy is gay people gross me out EWWWWWLadies and gentlemen, these are the people who hate you. Considering that when you spend 20 posts debating them.
>>37733862>you mentioned a thing. indicative...is that the best you got?
>>37733870Scientific consensus magically aligning itself with the dominant ideologies of the time clearly inspires confidence
>>37732456Almost.A transwoman is assigned male at birth, so she might be intersex--but it was decided at birth that they were looking at more of an "M" than an "F".Practically, being "male" or "female" means you can effectively deliver one half of the zygote needed to build a person. If you fail to ever have capacity to do this in your life, you're intersex.Therefore, a tranny could be "mostly male but really, we weren't sure" and then transition into a transwoman.Pedantic, I know. But AMAB and AFAB manage to work as useful catch-alls, even the for reproductively compromised.Like, how a woman is just an adult AFAB.
>>37734060against what, exactly? you're the schizoid on the street corner around here, no one cares>>37734089> most people believe in science> this must be a conspiracy since i dontI L L I T E R A T E
>>37733870i enjoy reminding them that irl they're pathetic losers that no one would take seriously in a scientific forum as they try to "educate" me while clutching their GEDs
>>37734254When the fourth reich happens we'll see who'll take who seriously.
>>37734278> TWO MORE WEEKS MY FELLOW MAGAPEDES!!it's sad that you've gone from > i understand scienceto> i'm a violent sub-human ape actuallynot at all surprising but at least try to have some self-awarenessyour life might be better if you actually did something other than whatever you call this nonsense.
>>37734238i accept your concession
>>37734278Ahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahajahjajjahhahhhhaaaaaahahahahahahahahhahahhahha
>>37732615lmaoooo, this, buddy >>37732602Too funny. "Gender" can't mean "what I look like / what I'm attempting to look like" because theyfabs are incapable of producing the aesthetic they want.They either remain "women" or they take T and people mistake their shitstaches as "aww, liddle dood's a transman!"Gender identity is the only useful variant of the word, and it's pure psychology, which means no ostensible markings.
>>37734278ahhahah ewwwwwwww omg LMAOcareful not to cut yourself edgy boi. you realize nazis actually went outside right?
>>37732446Shes right>>37732489Not sex the act>>37732500This
>>37732446it literally is. sex characteristics arent, but the way we group/label them is. the fact that we looked at like certain sexually dimorphic featues and made 2 groups for like different combinations is entirely a social construct, lots of people arent fully/completely one sex or the other intersex conditions are way more common than youd think
>>37732500it being a reductive model isn't the only criterion for determining whether something is a social construct or not, though. social constructs depend on collective propagation, which we are free to alter whenever or however the collective sees convenient. this is true to a point with our treatment of biological sexes, in that the collective understanding of sex as a whole is limited, but it does not imply that biological sex itself, in its entirety, is a social construct. as long as we can point to a set of inputs (chromosomes, hormones, etc.) and connect them to a set of outputs, then biological sex exists outside of social construction.
>>37735343So the act of sex itself isn't a social construct; what exactly would be the social construct if not for the act of sex itself? This doesn't make any sense. You can't just call something a social construct and it magically becomes a construct. A construct is something that society defines arbitrarily, but sex is a reality whether you call it a construct or not. It isn't like people always buy into what sex should be just because they had shitty parents and got all their pointers from tv or social media. Sometimes people genuinely do get together and fuck because....idk, maybe they aren't miserable twitter or 4chan users just mad at the world and actually get some because it feels good and they like doing it to and with each other? What the fuck is wrong with you people?
>>37732446sex is constructed through a combination of biological processes AND social processes and interpretations. In addition, these processes are linked are impossible to detangle as they inform and influence the other. Either way, HRT, electrolysis, surgery, etc impact the biological and social aspect of sex, so the idea that its immutable is just TERF rhetoric. Imo less trannies should read whipping girl and more trannies should read judith butler
>>37732446>separating the social and biologicalwhy does the leftist mind refuse to comprehend humans as animals
>>37732638Occam's Razor: Gender dysphoria is social media invented mind virus that's the result of society normalizing the pussification of men and every surrounding itToo many people alive today are immoral, weak and anti-social we suffer because we allow them to exist
>>37732446of course it istrans woman gets ppt>oh no you need to dilate twice a day for life or it closes up>tell doctor this is not actually true>doctor treats me as if I am expressing a delusioncis woman gets ppt>after a year or so when your muscles have adapted you will not really need to dilate any more>she says this has been her experience>doctor confirms this is normal and expected
>>37732446Males are those that currently have the ability to impregnate others, females are those that currently have the ability to be impregnated, those who can do neither are functionally neither sex. Simple as. Any other assertion propagates itself on intellectual masturbation and is therefore a social construct (wrong)
>>37732446it kinda is. either way though abstracting more aspects of life *especially* sex would be in general very good honestly, its even baseder for pissing off the material world. but if you cant even conceptualize sex being more of a social construct in modern society youre probably really fucking retarded anyways, or obsessively literal with a very poor grasp on semantics
>>37733132For how obsessive and neurotic they are neither poltards or xitterfags can comprehend the idea that some parties may benefit from a massive cultural tide distracting from issues onto a nothingburger and potentially changing the outcome of an election on its own and may attempt to bring about this tide to distract radicals and swing voters i guess because i've never once seen them think that in any capacity. like i get it doesnt really go along with their ideology but for how fast they jump onto conspiracy theories youd think theyd have that idea about their most obsessed subject every once in awhile. i guess it's just really convenient in their own words that 0.01% of the population managed to take the spotlight when many political parties dropped immigration for the temporary economic benefit to them specifically.
>>37732973You can lose your job if you don't worship terfs, and have to pay out hundreds of thousands for their hurt feelings
>>37735908you dont know what occams razer means do you
>>37733464Do burgers think "penis" is s swear word?
>>37735854performing gender is bullshit and butler doesnt even talk about sex
>>37734396you didn't rebuke a single thing my dude. i don't have to respond to your statement of your ignorant opinion that doesn't take into account any of the reasons that psychiatrists, doctors, scientists etc. perceive transgender identity as more than a subjective perception.>>37735908> occam's razor means the thing that fits most with my ass-backwards worldview is correctrofl, lmao.>>37738666they might accidentally get aroused and distracted if they say COCK
>>37732456/thread
>>37732446 everything is a social construct, we play fast and loose with definitions. even the lines where we draw distinctions of species are social constructs without proper functioning rules outside of "you know it when you see it"
>>37738680>butler doesnt even talk about sexbutler literally spends half of her most iconic book (gender trouble) talking about explicitly sex, you obviously haven't read it
>>37733351sex != gender but sex is a bimodal distribution made up of hundreds of sex characteristics, none of which are necessary or sufficient to sex someone on their own.Medical transition is the process of changing enough of those characteristics to change your aggregate position on the distribution.
>>37743721if we're being real we all know sex as a concept is based on penis, vagina, or secret third thing (rare) it is a social construct and it's not as complex as your chart it's just a role we ascribe people based on their bits
>>37743721what are the axes?
>>37732446sex is a social construct, there's no way to directly observe sex>chromosomeschromosomes are chromosomes, you can directly observe them, but to use them to sort people in society into categories is social construction, that's all a social construct is, a thing societies do to construct categories and ideassocial construct does not mean "not real" or "not constructed with reference to observable things"
>>37743843animals were sexually dimorphic before society existed.
>>37735854>>37743721good posts
>>37743852do you think even the idea of animals existed before there were people to think it?
>>37743852human created models didn't exist before people created them lmao
>>37743887things existed before humans, yes. are you an evangelist?
>>37743907wait sorry you actually think the concept of animals existed before people were thinking it?where did the concept exist?
this mfer thinks unperceived reality is segmented LMAO
>>37743921concept as in the idea in the mind? how could that exist if there were no humans? animals existed before human societies and they were sexually dimorphic before human societies, this isn't complicated.
>>37743721yes that's what i was saying essentially but couldn't be bothered with the entire explanation knowing the response will just be illiterate screechingif they actually wanted to learn something they wouldn't be here
>>37743957>do you think even the idea of animals existed before there were people to think it?>yes>really?>nowe, people born after the creation of societies, have a model of sexual dimorphism, and we use it when looking at animals, and we can apply it to animals in the pastbefore people constructed this model, the idea of sexual dimorphism didn't existthe model is constructed by people, this isn't complicatedin fact let me use an analogy to make it even clearerbefore humans, was it ever 10 o'clock? what do you think?
>>37743990it's so cute how you're nervously dancing around disagreeing with my original point. you want to say that animals weren't sexually dimorphic before human societies came along SO bad but you can't because you know it would make you look retarded.
>>37744590well thank you for calling me cute but I think you misunderstand the central point here which is that sexually dimorphism is a model, it's not a feature of animals in themselves, it's a lens through which we can view animalsyou can draw lines around things in nature, but those lines aren't actually part of reality outside of our minds, do you get that?and you didn't answer my question: before humans, was it ever 10 o'clock? what about the sky being blue? is the sky blue without humans to categorise that wavelength into the category of blue?
If sex is a social construct then why can't I have any?
>>37733083Brother wat? Trannies are all pro-palestien to an almost comedic degree.
>>37744676unironically sex in that form is such a loose social construct, some people include head and hands stuff, some people only include PIV or PIB (penis in butt)
>>37743990>idea of sexual dimorphism didn't existso everything reproduced asexually until humans coined the term?fuckin' retard.
>>37744984you are again confusing a model of a thing and the realitybefore manhattan had a name the island was still there, the idea that it is one of the five boroughs is a social construct, without people to think about manhattan as manhattan, as one of the five boroughs, the concept of it doesn't exist, but that doesn't mean nothing sticks out of the sea there, not a very hard idea to grasp, and you still haven't answered the questions so maybe you're not actually approaching this in good faithand perhaps before you accuse others of being retarded you make sure you're not misunderstanding the argument, makes you look silly
>>37745061They must be pretending to be dumb nobody could miss the point that hard without it being wilful.
>>37732446>Now sex is a social construct too???Well yeah, everything is a social construct. Sex is a social construct which imperfectly describes biological systems.
>>37745164while we socially construct what a social construct is we can also have a model of construction where we don't reduce everything into being the same kind of thingyou can directly observe chromosomes, and while we technically socially construct what it means for something to be X or Y or O or whatever we can still say that's much closer to a direct observation of reality than it is to say a dollar bill has value
>>37745061the idea of manhattan is man claiming arbitrary ownership over the land. it doesn't suddenly become mamhattan now that man has colonized the land mass. it's not now manhattan, in fact it never has been and never will be manhattan because after man disappears from the face of the earth, the land will still exist. it doesn't then cease to be manhattan with the extinction of man because it was never manhattan in the first place.the idea of sex as a social construct present similarly. they didn't suddenly become dimorphic because man said so as that attributes far more power to humanity than they actively have.man didn't create the land that would become mamhattan. man gave it a name so that other men would be able feel ownership over something that they will never own and will continue on after their disappearance.
>>37732446binary sex male female is medical construct. sex is bimodalgender is neurological and is bimodal alsotrans women are biological female. trans men are biological male. nbs are biological intersex.anatomy and wrong sex development is a sickness. it is not trans that is disordered, their bodies are diseased. self-destructive. transition is treatment for sick bodies."non-disphorics" are not real.fuck gc, woketards, cissoids and humanists
>>37745280>it's not now manhattan, in fact it never has been and never will be manhattanit is manhattan to us though, it fulfils the criteria of being manhattan for us, nothing has a name fundamentally, we construct that, when we go extinct it will stop being manhattan to people because there wont be people, or humans at leastI don't know if you grasp the difference between constructed reality and the harsh brutal nothing of actual reality, maybe look up argument from geometry>they didn't suddenly become dimorphicwhat animals did they continue to do, but the model of sexual dimorphism isn't the territory to mix metaphors, the idea that some animals are one sex and some are another is attributing abstract traits to them that they themselves don't have, like manhattan doesn't have a name or borders fundamentallywe distinguish and separate out reality into discrete things, those lines don't exist outside our mindsanimals are like the continent of north america here, we drew the lines around manhattan, around texas, around canada, and we drew lines around male deer and female dophins and drone bees, these aren't intrinsic traits of the things in themselves
>>37745282this depends on what amount of medical transitioning you do, an nb that does none is the same sex as their agab
>>37745264>you can directly observe chromosomesSuch a boring argument. Chromosomes don't discretely sort human beings in to a binary of two categories. No biological observation does. Chromosomes have by far the least social utility of any identifier. Absolutely no one on the face of the earth checks another humans chromosomes when they meet them.
>>37745379you're strawman argument has gone on long enough.manhattan doesn't reproduce. it's not sensate. you're trying to denounce animals to non-sensate objects akin to a land mass. is manhattan alive? no. it's a piece of land. the things that live on it are alive.you're trying to make this incredibly semantical argument to say that everything is a social construct and nothing matters. anon. social construct are to maintain law and order amongst humanity. they're agreed upon by humans.let's extend your argument but instead of calling it manhattan, let's call it palestine. regardless of whether you call it palestine or israel is determined by who wins the war because the victors are the ones allowed to arbitrarily inforce their law. that land itself is neither israel nor palestine. who controls the land deems how we call it.the same can then be extended to your argument. whether we call it sexual dimorphism or accept that it's simply one human race is dictated to us by the people in power. the same people that would rather you fight amongst themselves as they continue to reap the rewards of the common man's labor.
>>37745504I'm not making an argument about how to sort people into categories I just mean they're less socially constructed than, say, the category of sex itself, I agree with your points
>>37745504>>biological observation does.why does one have a penis and one have a vagina? what's the difference? how is it not an observable difference?
>>37745509>sensatethis really doesn't make a difference unless we're talking about animals that have the capacity to create a model of sexual dimorphism, I don't think even chips do that though so we're safe to keep that mental acuity attributed just to humans>you're trying to make this incredibly semantical argument to say that everything is a social construct and nothing mattersno I'm not, I just made this point here actually >>37745264 I think you can have degrees of construction even if we never get to bare reality (argument from geometry)>that land itself is neither israel nor palestine. who controls the land deems how we call it.we can say the same about the model of sexual dimorphism, we actually used to use a one sex model that emphasised the similarities between male and female, not dimorphic but complete and incomplete sex, the model we use could be different it's not a fact within reality it's a series of lines we draw onto it>reap the rewards of the common man's laborwave the red flag comrade let's sing the international
>>37743771you don't know what bits everyone on the street has and you sex them just fine. you do that based on observing their numerous sex characteristics and dumping them into whichever bucket you think fits better.>>37743801Y number of people, X some form of "weighted sex characteristic average" which is to say e.g. having facial hair earns you negative points, a low WHR some positive points, a deep voice negative points, etc. More or less points depending on the characteristic in question.
>>37732446I am suffering second band embarrassment, I hate that as a tranny I'm associated with these people.
>>37745612he's not gonna fuck youwell he might
>>37745595>we used toand we don't anymore because your opinion is no longer the popular one. congrats. you just lost the game.
>>37745810the one sex model isn't my opinion, not sure why you would think that, but you're wrong about that, so I guess you lose or whatever childish thing you would say there?why were you afraid to answer my earlier questions? it seems like you came around to my argument in the end anyway, so I guess we both win, I was right and you learned something, comrade
>>37745436biological as in neurbiological, transition only changes anatomy to certain extend
>>37745604no that's what the concept of gender is, sex is based on bits
bump
