[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: emilyof4chan2.jpg (162 KB, 2178x184)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
Um, well, is she right? Is female privilege never having to beg for intimacy?
>>
Hmm well this specimen is actually from Queensland. You might not be aware if you don't deal with these mongrels on occasion but literally every single person from Queensland is retarded. I don't mean retarded in hyperbolic sense either; to imply they are just a bit stupid, we are talking about full on drooling invalids that can't wipe the shit out of their own arsehole.
>>
File: Stress.png (1.12 MB, 1920x1080)
1.12 MB
1.12 MB PNG
>>37798133
idk im a miserable transbian
>>
>>37798553
What's wrong with Queensland?
>>
>>37798133
>she
it's a man
he manmodes despite being on hrt
and spouts incel talking points
>>
>>37798644
its full of queenslandorians
>>
>>37798656
>despite being on hrt
there is no hrt here, he only take licorice extract saying it's better than hormones lmao
>>
>>37798133
why is this sissy crossdresser back?
>>
>>37798691
we're all sissy crossdressers here
>>
>>37798659
I'm from Victoria.
Queensland is based.
It's got Pauline in it.
>>
>>37798717
speak for urself
>>
>>37798732
You're FEMALE.
XX-chromosomes, zero-T, functional uterus, female.
YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
>>
>>37798734
schizo moment
>>
>>37798738
>hurr durr
Everyone hates you right now. You've impressed no one.
>>
>>37798738
yeh he’s really weird, is there a way to filter trips on my phone?
>>
>>37798741
i'm not even the anon you replied to you drooling retard, and i've seen you attack other people in other thread saying the same shit about foid, you have mental issue
>>
>>37798133
i hate boomerhons SO MUCH
>>
>>37798751
Because your the same fucking person you fucking retard.
There's not that many people here right now, and you stick out because you think what you're saying is getting applause, when it isn't.

This board is FULL of hons who don't pass and WISH they had my courage.
You bounce off me and destroy them.
You fucking cunt piece of shit. Fuck off. You do not have friends here. Nobody likes you.
>>
>>37798762
you're not getting stalked by one foid you mong, nobody like you boomer sissy ass in here, go chew on your licorice instead of trying to speak for trannies, you're not one of them
>>
>>37798734
post ribcage
>>
>>37798774
>you're not getting stalked by one foid you mong
Yes. I am.
You followed me to /bant/, and now you're back after your ban from the last time you stalked me expired (because you're too fucking female to know how to dodge bans)

>>37798774
>>37798776
Oh look, time stamps exactly one minute apart.
Because you're mad right now.
Because you're fucking broken in the fucking head.
Stupid dumb bitch, get killed.
>>
File: ok.png (23 KB, 784x478)
23 KB
23 KB PNG
>>37798779
try again you fucking retarded sissy, you will be allowed to talk "for" trannies the day you're on hrt
>>
>>37798785
You will never be a tranny.
You will be a foid.
You will ALWAYS remind them of the nightmare bitches that made their lives a living hell in high school.
That is WHAT you are.

Because there is no who. You're not a person. You're just female.
>>
>>37798791
why u type like a male?
>>
>>37798791
i'm neither a tranny or a foid you ogrebeast, i'm just a twink tired of seeing your ass making a mockery of my tranny friends
>>
>>37798796
Because I am male you fucking retard.
So is everyone else here.

>>37798800
You're a lying foid.
You've clearly never even met a fucking twink.
>>
>>37798808
>You're a lying foid.
cope harder with your delusion, nobody likes you
>>
>>37798791
Holy schizophrenia
>>
>>37798808
>so is everyone else here
huh i thought everyone here was a “foid”
>>
>>37798810
EVERYONE fucking loves me until you show up and ruin shit.
Literally had a great day all fucking day and then you show up and make everyone miserable.
Because you can't empathize with them. You don't know what they feel because you've never felt it.

>>37798811
don't fall for her shit you dumb idiot.
This is fucking transparent.
>>
>>37798829
literally no one likes u lmao
>>
>>37798829
>EVERYONE fucking loves me
lmao
>>
>>37798831
Literally no one likes YOU
Stgupid greek bitch that's what you were when you got laughed off /bant/ because your flag gave you away.

>>37798835
Yeah literally. Stop fucking fooling yourselves.
You're joining on a team because that's how foids fight, but you're going to be alone with the brainbroken foid.
>>
>>37798829
i havent seen a single positive post about you. POST RIBCAGE YOU FAT DEGENERATE HON
>>
>>37798844
i only use tttt and im not greek lol ur schizo
>>
i refuse to believe that's not a larp, nobody can be this delusional and a parody of the woman hating tranner
>>
>>37798865
were definitely feeding a troll but it’s kinda funny
>>
>>37798849
Because you've only read your own fucking posts.

This is the vibe I bring
>>37798470
>>37798165
>>37796845
>>37797489
>>37797323

That's what the board without you looks like.
And you can't stand it.
You have to tear me down to make yourself feel better because you are JUST a fucking bitch.
>>
>>37798868
>feeding a troll
of course, theres no way any tranny would have that body and not immediately kill themselves
>>37798870
get new material calling everyone the same person is just retarded and schizophrenic
>>
>>37798849
don't call him a hon, don't insult real hon like that
>>
>>37798865
Have you actually met any trannies IRL?
>>
>>37798873
I'm not though.
You've actually managed to draw an idiot into your stupid bitchout.
Not that it fucking matters because there's no popularity context here. Everyone who is supposed to be here is losers who were bullied by bitches like you in high school and it fucking scarred them.
>>
>>37798887
all i did was tell you to post ribcage twice why are you sperging at me. YOU STILL HAVENT POSTED YOUR RIBCAGE FAT FUCK HURRY UP
>>
>>37798887
and u were the bully and still are, u were that big straight sports guy who bullied the gay boys for not being masculine enough
>>
>>37798875
>him
Did /pol/ arrive to start misgendering people?

>>37798892
No what you did was continue to (you) me until it completely derailed a good fashion thread, and then started ANOTHER thread about me, because you're FUCKING OBSESSED.
>>
>>37798901
i made two posts. the rest was you derailing the thread. congrats hon you cant take responsibility for your actions just like a real girl
>>
>>37798895
Sports? Nigger I was an obese computer-nerd, what fucking sport do you think I played?
>>
>>37798908
The rest was me an anon ENJOYING THE THREAD
The tread that was not about ribcages.
Yeah, I got a fucking manchest, and?
So do half the trannies on this board.
What the fuck should we do about it?
>>
>>37798901
it’s not misgendering to call a male crossdresser he, ur not even on hrt lmao
>>37798909
yelling the n word only makes u more annoying
>>
>>37798908
I notice you still haven't addressed that >>37798870

All that fucking content, all those great fucking vibes, all without you.
And then this thread, your contribution.

You are TOXIC. That is all you are. I am just a focus for your toxicity.
>>
>>37798876
yeah, that's why there is no way i believe you're not a larp, none of them are fat misogynistic crossdresser who say hrt is harmless lol
>>
File: tranny devito.jpg (100 KB, 1280x720)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>37798933
Nigger what's my fucking name?
Go back.

>>37798939
>none of them are fat misogynistic crossdresser who say hrt is harmless lol
They all are.
They literally ALL are.
the entire trans community is old dudes secretly wearing womens panties to work and sucking each others dicks when their wives aren't home.
Because fucking bitches like you make them ashamed of what they are.

As usual, TERFs wave the rainbow flag harder than anyone.
>>
>>37798870
nta but none of those post have anything to do with liking you lol, and not sure why you linked your own op, also spoiler, you're not going to grow massive boobs because you ate 5k calories, you're not even on hormones, all that fat is going to your guts
>>
>>37798954
ur name is edward of susans place
>>
File: bait.png (84 KB, 295x498)
84 KB
84 KB PNG
>>37798954
>They all are.
>They literally ALL are.
>the entire trans community is old dudes secretly wearing womens panties to work and sucking each others dicks when their wives aren't home.
>>
>>37798957
But you are that Anon. That's exactly who you are.
Nobody else is taking notes on my lore. That's just a you thing.

>>37798964
>I've never met a tranny, I actually think Hunter Shaeffer and Finnster are representative.
>>
>>37798969
>>I've never met a tranny, I actually think Hunter Shaeffer and Finnster are representative.
you're projecting, half my close circle of friends are trannies lol
>>
>>37798987
Lol you don't have friends.
You hang out here for hours a day every day.
You are a broken person who think MAYBE she can fit in here.
But you can't.
You need a Y-chromosome to post here.

You do not have their trauma. You do not understand them. I am not popular because I'm witty and smart. I'm popular because I'm kind in the way they need me to be.
>>
>>37799004
you legit sound mentally ill
i'm just a dude, and you're making all kind of weird shit up
>>
>>37799004
ur not popular like only cuz ur hon ass is posting again i was reminded of ur existed i literally forgot about u kek
>>
>>37799024
>i'm just a dude
You tell on yourself CONSTANTLY.
notice your silly little orbiter is gone.
>>
>>37798133
Being desired by a man isn't intimacy, neither is just having sex lol.
>>
>>37799032
I've been here all day.
My thread on /bant/ is still going.
No problems until you.

>>37799036
How would you know?
>>
>>37799032

A world without you.
>>>/bant/21490180
>>
you have the body of a drunk 50 year old boomer who throws the remote into the tv and breaks it when his favorite football team loses
>>
>>37799045
Because I'm a woman and plenty of men have wanted to fuck and emotional intimacy is something that's been had with way less people than that. Emotional is a mutual deeper thing than just being desired. Sex isn't necessarily intimate by default, it can be mechanical and empty.

It seems like common sense to me that being desired (an ultimately surface level thing based largely on appearances) wouldn't be equivalent to a deep connection. Men who don't know me even a little and want to fuck me or who invent some ideal in their head about me that they attach themselves to and "love" aren't getting to know me past the surface. There's no past the skin deep connection, how is that intimacy?
>>
>>37799067
who asked tho?
This isn't passgen.

>>37799075
>Because I'm a woman
Stopped reading.
We're always blind to our own privilege.
And women are incapable of empathy.
>>
>>37799075
Emotional intimacy.*
>>
>>37799034
i don't even know what you're talking about lol
>>
>>37799078
You asked me why desire isn't the equivalent of intimacy and I answered. But go on and be a retard who thinks surface level desire and casual sex are somehow intimate.
>>
>>37799086
Of course you don't.
You're female.
But everyone else does. Because you need a Y-chromosome to post here.

>>37799091
>You asked me why desire isn't the equivalent of intimacy and I answered.
No I didn't.
I assumed you were a male who has experienced the crushing lonliness and rejection that comes with being male. My post was accusing you of being a virgin.

But you're not a virgin, you're a female. And as such you NEVER HAD TO BEG FOR INTIMACY.
>>
imagine the age u trooned at starting with a 4 and not a 1
>>
>>37799104
>You're female.
i'm not, i'm not sure why you hate women so much but i'm still not one
>>
>>37798936
nigga i went to make breakfast for my family and (you)re double replying me about a post i already responded to. AND you still havent posted ribcage. brother take a fucking xanax
>>
>>37799111
I've met trannies where the number starts with a 7.
What they've gone through, and what they're still going through, would crush you into paste.

>>37799113
Do you EVER tell the truth?

>>37799122
Who the fuck are you and why should I care?
>>
>>37799138
thats what im asking you nigger POST YOUR FUCKING RIBCAGE
>>
>>37799142
why?
Why are you so obsessed?
>>
>>37799138
>starts with a 7
lmao how can u not have figured it out by 16?
>>
>>37799147
i like to laugh at people that are less than me
>>
>>37799138
>Do you EVER tell the truth?
always, there are dozen of people in the thread you know, not all replies are the same person lol
>>
>>37799149
If you are 70 years old today, what year was it when you were 16?

>>37799150
>>>/r/eddit

>>37799154
The MAJORITY of the posts are you and me.
>>
>>37799157
not going on plebbit when the entertainment comes to me right here
>>
>>37799157
>The MAJORITY of the posts are you and me.
i made like 4 or 5 post lol
>>
>>37799157
long ago but doesn’t matter there were trannies in the 70s and 80s
>>
>>37799104
The statement made in the post equates being desired with intimacy, but being desired isn't intimacy and that's what I said from the beginning. >>37799036
Did you read? Doesn't seem like it. This is the statement I opened with that you then asked me to explain. You can't twist words and bullshit when everything is written out and on display.
>>
>>37799104
>he crushing lonliness and rejection that comes with being male
nta but you know not everyone is a fugly incel, right?
>>
>>37799162
But it isn't coming to you here.
You'll notice the stunning absence of ribcage.

So again, why would I post it?

>>37799168
>I can't do math
Yeah the ones I'm talking about are the ones from the 80s.
We always knew.
We just didn't know what to do about it.
And SO MANY are still trapped, by cunt mouth bitch faggots who need to get their heads stomped in by nazis like you.

YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
>>
>>37799178
the more you reply, the harder my cock gets. i cant handle all the attention, IM GONNA COOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
>>
>>37799178
>we always knew
lmaoooo no u didnt
>nazis like you
aren’t u the one who hates jews and black people?
>>
>>37799178
you type like cure
>>
>>37799169
>but being desired isn't intimacy
You don't understand because you've never felt it's absense.
You are therefore not able to have this conversation.

>>37799177
Nigger. Seriously?

>>37799180
Well here's another (You). Enjoy.

>>37799182
My fault, dangling participant. I'm the nazi, your the one who needs her head stomped in by nazis, to make the world a better place.
>>
>>37799183
because it's the new cure larp
>>
>>37798133
i feel like having to be constantly on the edge around men is worse than sex being available.
>>
File: coom.jpg (23 KB, 704x480)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>37799190
OUYGHYHGHJKGH
>>
>>37799195
That's a you problem.
The terfs will never accept you as one of their own btw.
>>
>>37799190
I understand what intimacy is, and it's not just being desired. The only statements I have made are on defining intimacy not whether or not women have to beg for it you mongoloid.
>>
still waiting for a timestamp from that larper
>>
>>37799199
Holy shit the female ability to not hear what is being said to her.

YOU
ARE
NOT
ABLE
TO
UNDERSTAND
BECAUSE
YOU
ARE
FEMALE
AND
HAVE
NOT
EXPERIENCED
WHAT
IS
BEING
DISCUSSED
>>
>>37799205
I've post three timestamps.
You're just retarded.
>>
>>37799206
I'm able to understand what intimacy is, saying that the OP is defining it poorly by equating it to desire has nothing to do with the loosely adjacent conversation you're trying to say I can't have. You're not intelligent enough to be as condescending as you are.
>>
>>37799216
Read what I said over and over again until you understand it.
Don't infer a meaning.
Just read and understand.
>>
>>37799210
post them again then, they aren't in the archives so i highly doubt you posted any
>>
>>37799223
I don't care.
>>
Not interested in the lolcow or the arguments itt, but regarding the OP's question,
>Is female privilege never having to beg for intimacy?
The answer is unequivocally yes. Like as a gay dude I could get sex whenever I wanted, but not necessarily more than that. But as an mtf I get non-sexual intimacy, whether it's physical touch or other kinds of platonic affection and bonding, very easily. For women there's a presumption that this is normal and needed, and they're not stingy about giving when it comes to other women. Thing is though, men are partly to blame for this. Men aren't really this way with each other, and they often put all their eggs in one basket and expect to get everything they need from their girlfriend, which means when they're looking for intimacy it's bundled into their desire for sex. Women already try not to be too friendly with men fearing they'll take it the wrong way and interpret the behavior as being interested in them. You can imagine how much worse that situation would be if they tried to be platonically affectionate.
>>
>>37799220
I understand what you said it's just stupid and dismissive. You're either disingenuous and engaging in bad faith or you're stupid. I'm inclined to think it's all of the above at this point.
>>
>>37799195
fembrained, passes
>>37799198
malebrained, not gonna make it
>>
>>37799192
i feel bad for him.
>>
>>37799226
I'm the tripfag the OP is quoting you objective idiot.

>>37799228
>I understand what you said
No. You don't.
You want to have a discussion about what intimacy is.
But that is not within the context of the question.
You can't understand that because you cannot see the world from a perspective other than you own.
As such you cannot understand the question.

>>37799234
No you don't. You feel nothing foid.
You keep telling on yourself.
>>
>>37799248
>I'm the tripfag the OP is quoting you objective idiot.
I know and don't care.
>>
>>37799248
I think someone with a warped idea of intimacy could stand to learn what it is before talking about receiving it.
>>
>>37799254
Cool, well nobody read your wall of text, so I guess you're done here.
>>
You got a gnarly stick up your butt, you know that.
>>
>>37799224
didn't expect more from such a bad larp lol
>>
>>37799260
I think the idea that you could criticize my lack of understanding when you can't even understand that a male perspective which you are not capable of directly experiencing even exists is laughable.

I have lived as both straight man and straight woman. As such I have a perspective on female privilege that you CANNOT have.

So you don't have anything to contribute. At all. Nothing you say is of relevance.
Ergo
>>37799078
>>Because I'm a woman
>Stopped reading.
>>
>>37799273
You're a bitch. You get called a bitch.
>>
>>37799285
not that anon but you do understand woman include tranners, right? you're not completely braindead like most people think, RIGHT?
>>
>>37799291
>not that anon but you do understand woman include tranners
What do you think
>I have lived as both straight man and straight woman
means?

Please answer.
>>
>>37799248
ironic, since you just told on yourself. not like it matters. i understand why you'd do this
>>
>>37799299
I'm sure that post made sense to you.
>>
>>37799303
it does.
>>
>>37799296
i'm talking about the second part of your message you buffoon, you literally ignore people with the same experience as you
>>
>>37799311
But she doesn't have the same experience as me.
When she says she's a woman, she means a ciswoman. Which intelligent people could figure out from context.
>>
>>37799285
You're not living as a woman lol I've seen you. If you don't intimacy actually is then your idea of what you're experiencing is going to be warped in the first place. Having an understanding of intimacy to begin with is necessity to figuring out how much of it you're experiencing.

You're equating intimacy with being desired, this is faulty in and of itself.
>>
>>37799336
don't know*

+ If you define access to intimacy based on access to attention you're immediately going to have a warped idea of how much intimacy anyone experiences.
>>
>>37799226
No woman considers those hugs etc intimacy. What it seems from this thread is that men have a very touch starved and emotionally cut off idea of intimacy and don't define it similarly to women on any level.
>>
>>37799358
>What it seems from this thread is that men have a very touch starved and emotionally cut off idea of intimacy
oh no it's not us, it's only emily lol
>>
>>37799336
>I'm invalidating your experiences
Yeah of course you are. What else could you do in this situation?

Let me explain your position to prove I can see you perspective and understand, so I can then prove that you're too stupid to speak to me.

Your position is that one night stands and tawdry hookups are not genuine intimacy, that to be truly intimate with someone requires a connection built over time, and based on more than sex.

That is what you're trying to "explain" as if that wasn't already considered before the original argument about female privilege was made. And here's why you're stupid.

The reason you are unable to form intimacy with your sexual partners is not because they are one night stands, it's because you are not able to connect with them on their level. You got to pick based on pictures of dicks who was going to give you an orgasm that night. They have to devote their ENTIRE LIVES to getting picked by you.

THEY always have to beg.
YOU never have to beg.
That is your privilege of being a woman.
And because you cannot recognize your role in their misery, you are unable to form intimate bonds with them.

I am not so disabled. The men I sleep with call me back because they like talking to me.
>>
>>37799358
I didn't mean in and of itself, but certainly part of it, especially from a male perspective. Most dudes aren't even close to being open enough to intermingle psychologically in any shape or form. This is the same sex known for nodding and grunting at each other and calling it communication.
>>
>>37799378
>Your position is that one night stands and tawdry hookups are not genuine intimacy, that to be truly intimate with someone requires a connection built over time, and based on more than sex.
she's right lol
>>
>>37799383
>Most dudes aren't even close to being open enough to intermingle psychologically in any shape or form.
That's not them. That's you.
There are some who I can't connect with, but that's just a compatibility thing.

The ones I do connect with - it's profound, and easy.

>>37799402
Skill issues.
Give me two hours with a man without clothes and I'll tell you his entire psychological profile.
>>
>>37799413
you're coping too hard
>>
>>37799418
>foidpost
be less obvious please.
>>
This is pretty good bait, I have to admit.
>>
>>37799364
Lol Well that's good, now I feel hopeful for everyone.

>>37799378
I don't have one night stands or a lot of partners. My current relationship has been on/off for almost 5 years, my first relationship lasted from high school-my early 30's. My shortest relationship lasted over a year. I don't sleep around nor do I look for intimacy in places it doesn't exist.

Your experiences aren't being invalidated, how you judge them being based on warped definitions is. Would be good for you to learn the difference.

I don't select partners based on pictures of dicks lol I'm always friends first, for years sometimes. If I were to select based on shit like that then I'd be engaging in activities that lack intimacy.

I do form bonds which is why I'm saying that desire and intimacy shouldn't be skewed.

You really invented a whole fucking person for me to be here lol.
>>
>>37799438
it's not, it's far too obvious
>>
>>37799383
Yeah I'm seeing that men don't really grasp the "non intimate" things that seem intimate to them because they're so cut off. It's really interesting how much that gendered socialization can affect people's views of something so important to connection and life.

True intimacy requires mutual vulnerability and care etc rather than a series of empty gestures, but for men these gestures aren't taught to be done from an empty place out of politeness.
>>
>>37799489
>I don't have one night stands or a lot of partners.
So you really don't know what you're talking about then. You don't even have the most surface level experiences upon which to base your comparison of levels of intimacy.

You are literally saying that ONLY your perspective as a long-term boyfriend haver is "intimacy" and therefore any other forms of intimacy are not-intimacy.

You're not just invalidating my experience, you're verging on solipsism, a narcissistic obsession with maximizing your own affirmation. Which you do by making them work, for years apparently, before you finally reward them with your version on intimacy on your own terms and only in the way that is the most gratifying to you.

Holy shit, check your fucking privilege you ignorant white bitch.

Anyway, we're up to about the 5th QED here, and not a single fucking one of them has sunk in with you. So I'm done. Continue to be the stupid bitch you are, it's not like you're alone.
>>
>>37799512
The irony of this is beyond hilarious.

They're cut off because women cut them off. And women cut them off because they are cut off.
And you are simply incapable of seeing that you are both cause and cure.

That's why I have 20 boyfriends. The bar is that fucking low.
>>
>>37799516
I'm Latina and aside from that I've been desired by plenty of men who I haven't done anything with. You're right I don't have relationships with men who I feel no connection with, but I have had sex without intimacy before (threesomes with my ex) so I do know what that's like, and one of those guys was around for a year and a half. I felt nothing there because there was nothing there, it wasn't intimate.

That being said the statement that's being quoted in the OP post equates intimacy to being desired by men, this is completely false and anyone who knows what intimacy is can grasp that. A virgin can tell you that's not intimacy and be correct, they dont need a specific set of experiences to grasp basic facts.
>>
>>37799539
>I've been desired by plenty of men who I haven't done anything with.
Because they have to beg.
You can't just pick one.

Q.E.D you fucking idiot.
>>
>>37799544
>You can just pick one.
is what I meant to say.
>>
>>37799525
Seems ridiculous to blame women when men refuse to be intimate with one another. They can fix their own problems and choose not to. Like the other anon said, because firstly they can't get past the hurdle of politeness. Men wear armor of irony, and when shit gets too real they follow it up with stoicism.
>>
>>37799539
stop feeding the troll
>>
>>37799525
It's a matter of childhood socialization in general not women. If I were to let every guy who wanted me in that would really take away from any intimacy snd connection that could be built with the right one.

I don't need or want an excess of "boyfriends" because I care about genuine connection. Literally have to turn people down because there is no being with them all or any desire for that.
>>
>>37799544
The ones who beg do so because they don't have a good idea of how to form a relationship in the first place. I've had guys see a few pictures of me and some stuff in my life and tell me they were in love with me and I'm special etc not even knowing me. Their begging stems from the same place them building a life in their heads and a character they want me to play in that life does. It isn't real, only those men beg.

>>37799560
I'm bored though.
>>
>>37799558
You seem to be implying political homosexuality.
That's retarded.

>>37799561
How does that change the point you dumb bitch.
Seriously, the shit you are typing proves that you are too stupid to know how stupid you are.

THE POINT IS YOU CANNOT COMPREHEND THE POINT.

Men have to beg for intimacy, but you are so infused with your own privilege that you cannot even comprehend that state of being, even as you cause it.

All those men to whom you did not provide intimacy, right or wrongly, suffered as a result.
>>
>>37799580
>You seem to be implying political homosexuality.
Um no, they don't have to be homo or do homo stuff to wear their hearts on their sleeves and take comfort in each other.
>>
>>37799579
>The ones who beg
That's ALL of them.
EVERY SINGLE ONE
The ones you picked were begging to, and the ABSOLUTELY RESENT YOU for making them do it. They probably won't admit that to you, they might not even admit it to themselves, but they do.

>>37799586
They do. Idiot. Those are called the he-man woman haters clubs.
This place used to be one of those.
But then women decided they have a right to be here.
>>
>>37799589
>But then women decided they have a right to be here.
This isn't /r9k/, it's /lgbt/.
>>
>>37799595
This is 4chan.
Before 2007 there were no women on the entire internet.
Then some faggot invented phones.
I hope he gets cancer and dies.
>>
>>37799580
Intimacy doesn't need to be begged for, it is the result of mutual vulnerability and closeness and can't be begged for.

You keep ignoring that the OP post statement implies that intimacy equates with being desired, it doesn't. Being desired can provide an opportunity for intimacy and ironically emotional intimacy can create desire, but desire and intimacy are not 1 for 1.

What is intimacy to you?
>>
>>37799604
Holy fucking shit your thick in head!!!!
YOU DON'T NEED TO BEG FOR IT

BECAUSE YOU ARE A WOMAN

Q.E.D: quod erat demonstrandum, meaning "that which was to be demonstrated"
>>
>>37799601
I've been on 4chan since 2004... as sad as that is there's always been women here, and I'm one of them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>37799589
You strike me as the sort of attention starved maladapted retard that thinks someone holding a door open for you means they want to bang you.
>>
>>37799604
The post in the OP was from a different thread where women, like you, complain about sexual harassment.
Which is literally men begging for affection from women.

And since I have now experienced both my point was women who complain about that shit, no doubt including you, need to be slapped unconscious every time they do.
>>
>>37799613
I wasn't talking about my personal experiences seeking intimacy, at no point did I do that actually. I haven't even said whether or not I think women have an easier time finding intimacy.

Once again what is intimacy to you?
>>
>>37799614
So much bullshit in one post.
You really do just only lie don't you.

>>37799627
Thefuck are you talking you gave you entire sexual history.
You make men miserable in order to please yourself, they don't leave you because they think themselves lucky that you make them miserable.

Until their libido drops off and they realize that you ain't bringing much to the table.
>>
>>37799625
Sexual harassment goes beyond begging and you're a retard if you think it doesn't. Men groping, saying disgusting shit, trying to follow you home, getting aggressive etc these are not begging. The desired result isn't intimate either, it's just sex (which isn't intimate in and of itself.)

This thread is a picture of the original post and the question "Is this correct?" and the answer is "The person who made the statement doesn't know what intimacy is in the first place so it's hard to discuss it from a warped standpoint."
>>
>>37799604
>Being desired can provide an opportunity for intimacy
This is where men get confused, because most of them only allow themselves to be vulnerable with their partner. For them it's one and the same. Among other men, being vulnerable means lowering the facade of masculinity. It's like giving someone else the keys to shut you down. When you're competing in a dominance hierarchy, that's the last thing you wanna do.
>>
>>37799644
That was probably an interesting point in the OTHER thread you piece of human excrement.
>>
>>37799646
Bitch the only one who's confused is you.
Because you're a dumb bitch.

The only case you are making right now is men don't beg for intimacy the way YOU like it. You're literally explaining how you cause them to suffer.

And I am explaining how I so easily got 20 boyfriends.
>>
>>37799641
I never once spoke about whether or not I had an easy or hard time with intimacy, the post subject. Explaining my dating history etc isn't the same, just adjacent. You really don't seem to understand the difference between adjacent things being brought into a conversation to foster understanding and answering a specific question.

It's honestly fascinating to be spoken to in such a condescending manner by someone as stupid as you.

I bring plenty to the table, I'm valued, and I know this because I experience my relationships with other people and understand them. I don't make other people miserable, if someone is miserable and I factor into that through things outside of my control like their headcanon that's not my problem or fault.
>>
>>37799663
>blah blah blah bullshit blah
Fuck you you dumb bitch. You are too stupid to talk to me. Please never do it again.
>>
>>37799666
check em
>>
>tfw you're trans and you get accused of being a callous foid, depriving the menfolk and making them beg for your attention
Just... wow.
>>
>>37799646
Yeah that makes a lot of sense. Actually this thread has made me feel for men even more than I did with that because it made me think about how much they're taught to cut themselves off and how different that is from female socialization which is forced openness even if it's faked. What's really sad is the disconnect between the two is in and of itself a way to create intimacy blockages all around. Men not knowing how to be open in the ways women understand intimacy because it's so foreign (and often only learning those things within a relationship) and women being taught to behave in ways that can imply intimacy to men but that are just on the surface for women who ultimately crave something deeper.

Everyone's been done a huge disservice by it.
>>
>>37799666
I only appear to stupid to talk to you because you're incapable of having a conversation and rather than following along and having a discussion you keep shouting the same few irrelevant points into the void while lashing out. You can just stop talking if you'd like, I won't miss out and I'm sure other people would find it pleasant too.
>>
>>37798553
Am bong; can confirm. We literally sent people who were too retarded to not commit crimes there, and then they were too retarded to use contraception and produced a race of inbred halfwits.

We more or less did it on purpose but did not predict the consequences since technological advancement is incalculable.
>>
>>37799697
I'm perfectly capable of having a conversation.
But I refer you back to my first response
>>I am a woman
>stopped reading
Just not with STUPID
NARCISSISTIC
CLOSED-MINDED
SELF-OBSESSED
PRIVILEGED
WHITE
BITCHES

DO NOT SPEAK TO ME AGAIN.
>>
>>37799727
You keep calling me white lol after I said I was Latina. Pretty obvious you don't read and just screech dumb shit.
>>
>>37799805
And you keep speaking to me, because you actually believe you have a right to be heard by me.
That you perspective is always valid to whomever you choose to give it to, but that you do not have to acknowledge the perspective and experience of other people.

You don't pass as latina.

The entire conversation has been about trying to get you to shut the fuck up and listen and you literally cannot do it. You are incapable.

So why the fuck would I listen to you? You are utterly generic.
>>
>>37798133
>>but anon women all want chad

>>and chad will leave them for the next girl


>>is female privilege not having to beg for intimacy?

Dude your logic is a circle. If this were true there wouldnt be women on youtube and tiktok right now saying they all want a long term relationship but they will never get one. The percentage of women who have bfs is getting very low. Trannies even passing ones can't get a husband.

So where is that privilege?
>>
>>37799836
Because you're talking about chads as if they're just born that way.
It's takes luck, skill and lifelong dedication to be a chad on dating sites.

Meanwhile I get 20 boyfriends because I'm more than happy to date average guys.

I made this argument when I was an incel, now I'm a tranny I was right. It's easy. They're begging. Just say yes.
>>
>>37799862
>>20 boyfriends

And the ones before the 20th one left you. See no long term relationship. I don't see how being a whore is something that is a privilege. Men can easily go to Asia or you lol since it seems like they throw you away once they are done.

>>I made this argument when I was an incel

So you downgraded? I don't think that is something that you should be proud about.

Also, incels most of them are straight. You can't be a incel if you were gay(you had to like men since you are dating them now).

I don't think you will ever get married in your life.
>>
>>37799886
>And the ones before the 20th one left you.
No. The 20 are the ones who keep coming back. Where else are the going to go?
> I don't see how being a whore is something that is a privilege.
Then maybe think about it for more than two second?
>Men can easily go to Asia
Yeah it's just so easy for a 20 year old pizza boy to hop a flight to asia to allieviate his soul crushing loneliness.
>or you lol
Yeah I'm pretty booked.
20 regular dudes is a lot since most bitches can't even handle one.

>You can't be a incel if you were gay(you had to like men since you are dating them now).
Lel.
>I don't think you will ever get married in your life.
So?
>>
>>37799909
So you decide to answer my logical questions with filth. Yeah I am done here you can't form complete sentences, hell I hardly think you know how to read. I am done with ad hominem but you deserve it.

Well you will get old and once you do you will find out that I was right you can't form long term relationship. Sorry last ad hominem, you are broken inside and out I don't know how but yeah it is seeping out of you. Pure disgusting.

Well I have a life I can't be here replying to people who are a the bottom trying to find some sort of hope.
>>
>>37799939
whatever. Fuck off.
I'm going to bed anyway.
>>
>>37799835
I'm speaking to you because I find your stupidity and over the top reactive responses amusing and you'll keep speaking at me even as you tell me I don't deserve a response lol. You're a joke. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't need you to listen to me, in fact when I asked you to define intimacy that was your chance to talk about your view and have me listen to you lol.

You weren't listening from the beginning before my gender was stated so I definitely don't have the expectation of you listening to me. lol You've shown yourself incapable of that from the start.

I wonder if you're even fully present inside your own head to comprehend what you're talking about.
>>
does he have nothing better to do than argue on 4chan all day?
>>
>>37799982
Nothing sinks in with you does. Literally everything just bounces the fuck off.
You must be very fucking pretty. Coz this sort of entitlement is only found in pretty girls.
>>
>>37799909
"I'm a reliable cum dump that lonely men come back to because it's easier than finding a meaningful relationship with someone for them. I think them coming back is intimate even though there's too many of them to develop any deep intimacy between us, and I fail to understand that because I don't know intimacy is a sort of exclusivity not something you give away to the desperate." - Emily
>>
>>37800000
Nice quints.
Right now I do have something better to do. And that's go to bed.
You will never have a penis. You will never be a cute tranny with orbiters. You will never be special.
>>
>>37800018
>Right now I do have something better to do
clearly not
>You will never have a penis
if only
>>
>>37800015
Wow. I got up to this bit
>I think them coming back is
and then you just went full retard.
g'nite

>>37800026
didn't read
>>
>>37800002
Things that are worth it sink in, so nothing you say is likely to if that's what you mean. People tell me I'm pretty ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That doesn't mean much though.
>>
>>37800034
>didn't read
how will i ever recover?
>>
>>37800034
>Doesn't understand that intimacy is a kind of exclusivity between people.
>Calls other people retards.
>>
why are femboys so narcissistic?
>>
>>37798737
>Lesbians do not belong on /lgbt/
>Bikes do not belong on /lgbt/
>Also insane foidhate while skinwalking foids
Least unbalanced rapehon
>>
>>37798779
>you're not getting stalked by one foid you mong
>Yes. I am.
Lmao, first time I've ever seen reverse gangstalking paranoia

Actual unironic literal medical schizo moment
>>
>>37800000
its cure so no
>>
>>37798734
Lmaooo
>>
>>37798133
>the privilege of being sexually assaulted
clearly you have to be extremely desperate or mentally retarded
>>
>>37799078
much misogyny

a sysfem from phantasy star universe has been one of my very closest friends for over 18 years and never let me down even after her gf fell for me in 2007, we dont talk everyday but always keep in touch and i know i can trust her completely

a local sysfem gave me a chance and spent newyears eve with me last year and gave me hope to keep going so i could meet my future wife 2 weeks later

stop being hateful of women just because some of them were mean to you, maybe you were the problem

women are capable of lots of empathy, like my wonderful pain management and psy doctor too

>>37799111
mine started with a 3, not everyone is hopeless past 20 it depends on genetic luck and strength of puberty, i dont think anyone is less valid by starting later for whatever their reasons may be, but i do think they should act with more maturity, decency, and self/external respect than Emily does

>>37799206
gracious im glad i don't have to be around you when you're angry

>>37799613
you sure need to beg for it look at the allcaps, you can be better than this

>>37800410
is it really? i don't know enough of that lore
>>
>>37800734
>mine started with a 3
maybe hrt but with transition pics u were girlmoding long before that but just couldn't access hrt, "emily" is just some incel who couldn't get a gf so he trooned at 40 during a midlife crisis, both entirely diffferent reason, and incel with midlife crisis is a super faketrans reason, being poor with a transphobic family but still trying to girlmode isn't
>>
>>37798133
ugh, whoever the hell this person is can fuck the fuck off with their incel bullshit. Calling yourself Emily and saying you're trans doesn't excuse misogyny.
>>
>>37800868
Why would this be misogynistic? Seems just retarded.
>>
I seriously don't understand why people want to be women when they hate them so intensely
>>
>>37800813
thanks for being sweet and understanding <3 bless you )*

personally i dont know alot about emily, and i think i dont really care to- if they want to be more valid they need to act in a way which garners that from others

all i see from emily is coomer shit that would make the average hsts boysmell gooner annoyed

i see no sense of self respect, look at all the allcaps reeeing and namecalling and blatent open misogyny on a mostly transfem board

>>37800868
i tried to give them some advice but clearly they have no desire to better themselves and think raunchy sex means something, it does all give creepy vibes

>>37801076
a good point too



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.