Would it be possible to pass extremely vague laws using the Republican majority, that effectively outlaw transgenderism and being trans in public, without explicitly doing so, knowing the highest court is majority anti trans and won’t care?
Anon they have all three branches they can be explicit.
>>38045363>would it be possible to passno :c
>>38045400Oh i get it.
I hope so.
from god’s lips
>>38045363yes. Florida has an anti cabaret law they can use in that manner. It makes any troon in public a sex offender if a child sees them and they get clocked.
>>38045363Probably not. Bathroom laws are fake and unenforceable. How many people have you seen sued by them? The answer is 0
>>38048141>this law hasn't been enforced YET, so that means it's OK that it's on the books and we shouldn't put any effort into restoring civil rights for trans people. We should just trust the republican who has a gun pointed at our face not to pull the triggerAlright uncle tom