If somehow we found which genes made you gay or not, would social conservatives be against gene editing to ungay people or simply aborting gay fetuses?
>>38583979no, conservativism is all about repressing yourself
girl. those chino's, not jeans.
>>38583979they'd be pro science destroying the gay gene without killing the embryo probably
>>38583979There's no "raped by your dad" gene, nor is there a "got into weird porn at 9" gene.
>>38584352explain more
Ofcourse they'd be against it, that involves science.These people have a blood lust, they want to bully and kill
>>38584402when i first started transition my heart used to bleed for every molesting story from trans girls i knew until i finally realized that basically every person whos that far from center (straight and cis) has been violated heinously at some pointflamers and trannies all got molested or exposed to porn at a young agejd0ja.
>>38585292I didn't lol.
>>38585292Seconded I was never molested or touched weirdly
>>38585292yeah no lol was never touchd or anything and ive always been very prude when it came to porn it skeeves me out and idky
>>38585292i was never molested or exposed to porn as a kid. that’s just u
>>38585367thirded
>>38584609NTA however a part of me doesn't believe these people care about science. We know how they were during COVID. I also imagine there would be some sort of payment barrier to finding out if your kid will turn out homosexual. These two barriers are (probably) enough for most social conservatives to shrug their shoulders and believe their individual parenting will result in a non-gay kid. That's where the encouragement of self repression comes in.
>>38585523Would Republicans be willing to overcome their opposition to communism and allow the state to subsidize testing to ensure fetuses can't be gay?That would be kinda a fun dystopia though where the rich don't have gay kids anymore, only the poor do. Good movie idea.
>>38583979yes they would, they are hypocrites and are totally ok with with making exceptions to the rules. being pro life doesnt just mean dont kill babies you cant kill anyone even criminals and we know how much they love killing criminals
>>38585533Kek it would make one hell of a novel. But irl? No. Republicans hate doing free things for minorities. It also means they get less people to bully.
>>38585555fantastic quads, anonbut also its funny to me how there's this thing called "sudden infant death syndrome" and basically republicans are ok with you killing your child but you have to give birth first, its like giving birth is the required humiliation ritual, you have to do that or well they don't arrest women for having abortions, but they did jail one woman for miscarrying through chemical abortion then buying the child, anywaysyou have to give birth, but then there's a trial period, the first 4 years or so you can kill one of your kids, if you are a woman, without anyone caring, you just say they suddenly died, everyone goes "this is sids!" and the world move on only women who kill multiple of their own kids are ever successfully prosecuted for doing so, otherwise it's sudden infant death syndromeso they want you to give birth, but after that, it's up to you
