[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: chess.png (1.56 MB, 1017x566)
1.56 MB
1.56 MB PNG
The recent Congressional package that passed in the US bans trans women from competing in women's Chess.
I think this is well and good but only if you admit that trannies have some innate advantage in Chess. That because they're amab they're smarter and better at it.

The other argument is that men get a natural advantage in Chess because they're pushed more into it from a young age and that gross guys harass women who play chess. But at a young age these social factors haven't happened yet. A trans teen has no social edge over a foid teen in Chess. The socialization is if anything worse.
>>
>>38599544
>they're amab they're smarter and better at it
it’s this one
>>
>>38599574
Idk, aren't foids dominating Unis and stuff? To me that suggests they're more intelligent
>>
>>38599607
childhood education is dominated by female teachers who are biased in favor of female students, education is generally organized for learning styles that benefit female students, male students are overmedicated in response to not functioning well in classrooms designed for girls, there are tons of female-only scholarships for post-secondary education and often direct quotas for female students in higher education. There's immense financial and social encouragement for female students in post-secondary even while they make up a good ~60% of students
>>
>>38599574
What's amab?

>>38599544
Why should they be banned from chess? I as well as all the normies understand is that trannies are better at physical sports, but why chess? Do normies finally think that women and men have different intellectual abilities?
>>
>>38599649
Yet boys still do way better on the SAT and only get in at the same rates.
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/actually-50-years-of-test-scores-do-confirm-that-boys-outperform-girls-on-the-sat-math-test/

I think you're somewhat wrong on the reasoning tho, or at least that there's more to it. I think it's the switch to holistic admissions and hot 18 year old babes coming off well in interviews and life history.
Having their bfs do their homework as well as their own prob helps too.

>Specifically, at the highest level of math performance on the SAT test last year for perfect scores of 800, there were 11,098 males and 5,570 females achieving those scores, meaning that nearly 2 males achieved perfect scores for every one female (male-female ratio of 1.99-to-1).
>Adjusted for the fact that more females (903,719) than men (794,802) took the SAT test in 2015, the percentage of males who earned perfect scores of 800 points was 1.4% compared to the percentage of females with perfect scores of 0.62%. That produces an adjusted male-female ratio of 2.26-to-1 (vs. the 1.99 unadjusted ratio) for high school students who had perfect 800-point scores.
>For scores of 750 points and above (98th and 99th percentiles), boys outnumbered girls by a ratio of 1.83-to-1 (36,927 to 20,210) and when adjusted for the differences in sample size, the male-female ratio was 2.08-to-1 (4.64% vs. 2.23%) for scores between 750 and 800.
>>
>>38599671
>Why should they be banned from chess? I as well as all the normies understand is that trannies are better at physical sports, but why chess? Do normies finally think that women and men have different intellectual abilities?
Dems didn't force them to explain so they just did it. There was no debate, it just happened.
>>
>>38599701
Typical Democrat cuckoldry
>>
>>38599544
>The other argument is that men get a natural advantage in Chess because they're pushed more into it from a young age and that gross guys harass women who play chess. But at a young age these social factors haven't happened yet. A trans teen has no social edge over a foid teen in Chess. The socialization is if anything worse.

shoun't thier be race tiers if thats the case , what a silly argument
>>
chess has nothing to do with intelligence
kasparov used to be a follower of the new chronology
multiple soviet grandmasters used to believe in astrology
i know for a fact that aronian is as stupid as the average 4chan user
>>
>>38599671
>What's amab?
Basically "trans women and men" but woke.
>>
>>38599544
>The other argument is that men get a natural advantage in Chess because they're pushed more into it from a young age and that gross guys harass women who play chess
even if this were true there would be no reason to prevent men who got into it from a young age from playing against the (ostensibly rarer) women who got into it at a young age. Ultimately this is just a funny result of hardcoded neurological differences being modern blasphemy (unless it's stuff which women brains are better at).
>>
>>38600133
>Ultimately this is just a funny result of hardcoded neurological differences being modern blasphemy (unless it's stuff which women brains are better at).
I see why the Dems caved on it. They didn't want to touch that debate with a 10 ft pole and were afraid of losing it
>>
>>38600096
it's also much shorter to say and less confusing, people say it all the time on here in the same breath as calling someone a bratwurst-fingered gorilla gigarapehon so it's not really woke bestie



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.