[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 71Fwdds9fGL._SL1500_.jpg (88 KB, 993x1500)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
Has anybody been able to read Damion Searls' new translation of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus? Is it any good?
>>
>>23324223
Just read the original bro, it's not that hard bro
>>
>>23324223
this book isn't worth reading in any capacity

heidegger BTFOd him in every direction and wittgenstein couldn't catch up to save his life
>>
>>23324223
All the nice quotes from this book are already mentioned in SubaHibi, which is the only reason to read it in the first place. It's laughable how badly formal logic is portrayed there



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.