Books where a whore reforms after finding true love?
fantasy?
You can't reform destroyed pussy and stretched anus
I don't get why simps have sympathy for whores. Once a whore, always a whore.
>>23361529THE ‘WHORE TO HOUSEWIFE’ PIPELINEBOOK: The Brothers KaramazovWHORE: GruschenkaGOOD MAN: Dmitri (good-ish anyway)WILL IT LAST: Yeah, probably. She was never really an out-and-out whore. They'll have lots of spectacular arguments but they'll always make up.BOOK: Far From The Madding CrowdWHORE: BathshebaGOOD MAN: Gabriel OakWILL IT LAST: Yeah, because she’s tried everything else and found it doesn’t work. She doesn't deserve him, but she’s got him.BOOK: Count BelisariusWHORE: AntoninaGOOD MAN: BelisariusWILL IT LAST: The book goes to the end of their lives, so we know it does, albeit with a few interruptions and problems along the way.
>>23361529Your mom's diary.
>>23361529"Mommy" by Mary Elizabeth Counselman.The story tells of a little girl in an orphanage, who claims to have been visited by her dead mother. The child was conceived out of marriage so that's why she was thrown into an orphanage after her mother's death. The child is adopted by a woman who has no children of her own nor husband, so she wants to adopt a child from an orphanage. On the way home, the pair is saved from a fatal accident by the apparent intervention of the dead mother's ghost, and the adoptive mother accepts the child's biological mother as real and part of the family. It first appeared in Weird Tales in April 1939.
>>23361537>>23361538This. Read A nervous breakdown by Chekhov
>>23361632>inb4 where is the true loveThe mother's love for her little girl of course, iirc the dead mother was a prostitute who quit prostituting and took up a cancer-causing factory job just so she could put food on the table and keep men away from her little girl
>>23361537You can, thanks to advancements in modern surgery.
>>23361529I think this will become less common in literature.The mainstream belief is that "there is nothing wrong with being promiscuous", so women are less likely to want to reform. And then will end up becoming miserable without understanding why.
>>23361722Childfree unmarried women are the happiest group of womenNote that doesn't mean they are whores, tons of virgins who don't trust men in that group, and those virgins will side with the promiscuous ones because they hate men
>>23361727>Childfree unmarried women are the happiest group of womenThey aren't.The one who promoted this was (I'm being very charitable here) misinterpreting the data.https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/18650969/married-women-miserable-fake-paul-dolan-happinessThe fact that most of mainstream media still spread his low quality book shows that there is an agenda in play here.
>>23361736peer review please
>>23361750Peer reviewed studies (which Paul Dolan's book is not) unanymously show that married women are happier.This is one of the few things in the social sciences we can be sure of.But then, someone writes a pop book for the general population and it is taken by the media as the objective truth.
>>23361750Wow you're retarded. Did you even read?
Men like you puzzle me, retarded romantics that have allowed women to hold on to the power they currently have, too stupid to realize their ideologies are what lead women to reject them.
>>23361824My friend went through a brief period in which he dated a whore who promised to reform because he was going through a phase and had incredibly low self-esteem. He dumped her the second things started going even slightly well.Thus, it is safe to assume the only ones with taste like OP's are incredibly low self-esteem.
>>23361775Wrong. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361146667_A_Systematic_Review_of_Life_Satisfaction_Experiences_Among_Childfree_AdultsHave some actual studies. Childfree women are the most happy.
>>23361529>>23361532>>23361537>>23361538>>23361617>>23361630>>23361632>>23361638>>23361645>>23361685>>23361722>>23361727>>23361736>>23361750>>23361775>>23361818>>23361824>>23361859>>23361870you just know she is going to cheat and cuck on the male with a Black man in their marriage
>>23361881what if she is black herself huh what then
>>23361736Anyone with the slightest feel for language will realize that the people calling childless woman "childfree" have an agenda.
>>23361889childless is for women who wanted kids but couldn't for whatever reasonchildfree is women who don't want kids
>>23361881Howdy patriot
>>23361870Retard. Stupid. Idiot.We are talking about marriage, not if people have children.Apologize for making me answer to this stupid post.
I'm >>23362085Here is the data, by the way.Notice how large is the difference between married and the other 2 categories.And this person here >>23361870 tried to distract from this by using the other category.Apologize. Apologize for trying to divert the result
>>23362093Couldn't it just be that women who are happier are more likely to get married?
>>23362093Couldn't it just be that women who are happy are more likely to get married?
>>23361529> WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN WOMEN be quiet friends
>>23362101>>23362104See picture related.Regardless of that, the claim that unmarried women are the happiest is unsupported by evidence. Evidence is very, very clear that married women are happier than unmarried ones, unlike what is being promoted by the media.Which shows a lot about the intellectual or moral level of journalists.
>>23362101>>23362104
>>23361529Resurrection by TolstoyYou won't read it though. You just wanted to make a shit thread, didn't you OP?
>>23362119>Same with the idea that "unmarried childless women" are happier -- are they sure it's not just because those women are more likely to be younger?Unmarried childless women are not happier.Ony 24% of them are "very happy", compared to 41% of "married women with children".Really, the book claiming unmarried women are the happiest is terrible and completely unsupported by data. It makes me genuinely upset that something this bad is influencing people.
>>23362085>>23362093>>23362101>>23362101>>23362104>>23362118>>23362119>Although there are many studies with the purpose of examining childlessness and some measure of general well-being, this review synthe-sizes such scholarship examining life satisfaction of persons without children. This review assessed published peer-reviewed arti-cles in six social science databases (Social Science Premium, PubMed, PsycInfo, SearchWise, Google Scholar, and SagePub)between 1979 and 2020 and identified 15 articles for inclusion. Examining childfree persons, the results of this review indicatea positive association between childlessness and life satisfaction. The results of this review support the need for greater explo-ration of the context of life satisfaction among diverse groups of childfree older adults.Read the actual study. These are childfree older women who report a positive association between childlessness and life satisfaction. If they are married, they married with other childfree people.
>>23361885KEK
>>23361529Lady of the Camelias is THE book on this. Very moralistic too
>>23362093all the chart shows is that women with empty egg cartons are the biggest copers
>>23362141We are talking about marriage. MARRIAGE.Take a look at this graph >>23362093Women who were not parents were slightly happier than those who were parents. But women who were unmarried were much unhappier than married ones.So, the claim that unmarried women are the happiest is false.
>>23362160>We are talking about marriageACTHUALLY we're talking about children since any trad right-winger nigga will tell you a marriage without children is not a real marriage anywaysee all the seething and coping about DINKS now
>>23362164No, we are not. We are not arguing about trad right wingers views on marriage. We are arguing over the claim made in >>23361727>Childfree unmarried women are the happiest group of womenWhich is very much false as shown in the graphic.
>>23362164Keep at it, anon. There’s a chance an unmarried /lit/ roastie might see this and allow you to lick her roastbeef.
>>23362132No, I genuinely wanted some recommendations on this specific theme. Thanks for the contribution desu.
>>23362174wrong again>Mintel’s Single Lifestyles UK Report reveals that 61% of single women say they are happy with their relationship status, compared to 49% of single men. Overall, it appears that unattached Brits are in no rush to find a partner. As many as 70% of singles in the UK say they have not actively tried to find a partner in the last 12 months*, rising to 75% of women.Also your source is the Institute for family studies, which has an agenda to push for views that fit its politics, see their 2014 study on same-sex parenting which turned out to be false and flawed. Don't you have any actual neutral sources?
>>23362216>Mintel’s Single Lifestyles UK Report reveals that 61% of single women say they are happy with their relationship status, compared to 49% of single menYou really don't want to admit you are wrong.We are comparing the happiness of single and married women.Not of single women vs single men.>Also your source is the Institute for family studiesThe source of the data is the General Social Survey. The IFFS are just reporting the data.Here is Gallup too, by the way https://news.gallup.com/poll/642590/married-americans-thriving-higher-rates-unmarried-adults.aspx
>>23362237>We are comparing the happiness of single and married womenYes and 61% of single women say they are happy with their relationship status>The General Social Survey documented a decline between 1988 and 2012 in the percentage of U.S. adults who agreed that married people are generally happier than unmarried peopleSo you are looking at the few people who had no reason to divorce in the last 15 years? Considering the extreme decline in marriage rates overall, I'd expect those that remain married to have good reason to do so, otherwise they would be in the divorced category. A consequence of not forcing women to marry and letting them live free is they are free to find actual good partners if they exist. Let's also look at the data for the previous 30 years though.
>>23362262>Yes and 61% of single women say they are happy with their relationship statusAnd? They are still unhappier than married women (the point being discussed). You won't be able to avoid this.>So you are looking at the few people who had no reason to divorce in the last 15 years? Considering the extreme decline in marriage rates overall, I'd expect those that remain married to have good reason to do so, otherwise they would be in the divorced category. A consequence of not forcing women to marry and letting them live free is they are free to find actual good partners if they exist. Let's also look at the data for the previous 30 years though.Look at picture related"Married people are happier than unmarried ones" has been a consistent result. Take a look at this data, that began in 1972 (when divorces were less common)
>>23362318>They are still unhappier than married womenThey are still quite happy in their own right. >"Married people are happier than unmarried ones" has been a consistent resultIf you factor men in, sure, marriage provides ample benefits to men. We're talking about women though.
>>23362345>They are still quite happy in their own right.The discussion is if unmarried women are happier than married women. And the data shows they aren't.>If you factor men in, sure, marriage provides ample benefits to men. We're talking about women though.You argued there is a difference in marriage satisfaction in the populace over the decades. I have shown that it has been consistent.
The painted veil. Sort of.
>>23361638Based Chekhov recommender. He has a story for any situation
>>23362362>The discussion is if unmarried women are happier than married womenAnd I would still like to see data that isn't tainted by conservative think-tanks.>You argued there is a difference in marriage satisfaction in the populace over the decadesI literally quoted the Gallup link YOU posted, do you even check your own sources?
>>23361881fuck off agp fucking kike
>>23362640>And I would still like to see data that isn't tainted by conservative think-tanks.The data is from the General Social Survey.You are just being stubborn because you don't want to admit you were wrong.Repeat after me: "Unmarried childless women are not the happiest demographic according to data".>I literally quoted the Gallup link YOU posted, do you even check your own sources?Your argument was that married people today have better marriages than those 30 years ago, since fewer people marry and stay married. I have shown that the differential between happiness of married and unmarried people kept more or less constant.
>>23362863>The data is from the General Social Survey.So the same people that documented a decline between 1988 and 2012 in the percentage of U.S. adults who agreed that married people are generally happier than unmarried people.>Your argument was that married people today have better marriages than those 30 years ago, since fewer people marry and stay marriedThat's a fact. https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces>The long decline started in the 1970s. Since 1972, marriage rates in the US have fallen by almost 50%, and are currently at the lowest point in recorded history.>I have shown that the differential between happiness of married and unmarried people kept more or less constantActually, no, you can't even see the decline in your own chart. And in 1970 divorce was already a thing, chump.Seem like you just don't want to admit unmarried childfree women are also happy to be unmarried and childfree and don't need a man.
>>23361529It's impossible for a whore to be reformed, their brain chemistry is fucked up. Women have specific brain chem issues that are different than men. Women evolved to not be whores, so if they do they can never properly bond with anyone.
>>23361881>mass-replying just to post your cuck fantasiespass away in a truck stop toilet
If marriage is so great why does divorce exist?
>>23362933it doesn't if you marry a virgin,Women who have lots of sexual partners cannot properly bond with a man.
>>23362933because women exist
>>23362863She is arguing in bad faith, dont waste your time
>>23362933Because marriage is not great when your partner is shit, and sometimes you don't find that out until later. The right to divorce was sought by women to protect themselves when the husband turns out to be a shit person. There are lots of shit men out there.>why don't they just know that before marriageNobody has a crystal ball. Bad events that had not yet occurred before can influence someone for the worse, like incurring into debt turns an otherwise tolerable guy into an insufferable drunk. Women, rightfully, want guarantees that they won't have to suffer for some man's shit.>but marriage is about suffering togetherYea, no, tons of people don't want that and that's why the marriage rate has plummeted. No reason to suffer when you can be better by yourself. Although the immediate exchange of information through the internet is making people get better at vetting red flags, like "are we dating the same guy" groups on facebook exposing bad behavior from various men to thousands of women. Not everyone is in facebook groups though. Also higher standards, for example if a guy doesn't respect your boundaries such as when you don't want sex, even if he does he still shuts up and accepts you don't want it, if he doesn't do that he is not a good husband.
>>23362938Virgin women still have a 35% divorce rate.
>>23362910>So the same people that documented a decline between 1988 and 2012 in the percentage of U.S. adults who agreed that married people are generally happier than unmarried people.The same study also documented their opinion is wrong. The truth is that married people are happier.You won't be able to escape this. The data shows married people are happier.>That's a fact.>https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces>>The long decline started in the 1970s. Since 1972, marriage rates in the US have fallen by almost 50%, and are currently at the lowest point in recorded history.This doesn't prove your theory that marriages now are happier than marriages 30 years ago (1994). This only shows people are marrying less often.>Actually, no, you can't even see the decline in your own chart. And in 1970 divorce was already a thing, chump.My chart has shown that as far as 50 years ago, there was a gap in happiness between married people and unmarried people. A gap that maintained more or less constant, rather than changing as you predicted it would.>Seem like you just don't want to admit unmarried childfree women are also happy to be unmarried and childfree and don't need a man.You claimed "unmarried childless women are the happiest group". They aren't. They are the 2nd least happy group of women after single mothers.You were wrong. Recognize that.
>>23362914the older you get the more youll realize nobody can bond with anyone and all your status about pair bonding are retarded because at the core its just a flaw of human nature
>>23362971>The data showsThe data you choose to believe shows that, but then Dolan also proved the opposite, as the American Time Use Survey compared levels of pleasure and unhappiness in unmarried, married, divorced, separated and widowed individuals. Levels of happiness reported by those who were married was higher than those who do not have spouses, but only when their husband or wife was in the room. People who were not married reported lower levels of misery than married individuals who were asked when their spouse was not present. So sounds like your data is flawed by the intimidating presence of a possible spouse falsifying the data.>This doesn't prove your theory that marriages now are happier than marriages 30 years ago (1994)>This only shows people are marrying less often.I would hope less marriages at least means those who do marry do so with a good choice. And ask yourself why people are not marrying as much now, because it's simply not good enough anymore.>A gap that maintained more or less constantLook at your own chart. The only thing that made the unmarried curve decline was 2008, and even that is rebounding.>You claimed "unmarried childless women are the happiest group". They aren't. Yes they are. Admit that, and stop preying on innocent women.
>>23363000>The data you choose to believe shows that, but then Dolan also proved the opposite, as the American Time Use SurveyThe only thing Dolan proved is his incompetence. >The problem? That finding is the result of a grievous misunderstanding on Dolan’s part of how the American Time Use Survey works. The people conducting the survey didn’t ask married people how happy they were, shoo their spouses out of the room, and then ask again. Dolan had misinterpreted one of the categories in the survey, “spouse absent,” which refers to married people whose partner is no longer living in their household, as meaning the spouse stepped out of the room.Dolan recognized his error>Dolan confirmed to me by email, “We did indeed misinterpret the variable. Some surveys do code whether people are present for the interview but in this instance it refers to present in the household.Now, repeat after me: "Unmarried childless women are not the happiest demographic of women. They are the 2nd unhappiest after single mothers".
>>23363030come on man, dont be so harsh on her, the cope that strong independent women that dont need no men are just as happy as married women is the last modicum of cope she has left
>>23363030>“spouse absent,” which refers to married people whose partner is no longer living in their household"no longer living in the household" but still married? Means there is a possibility of the unwanted abusive spouse returning at any moment, they are not divorced or widowed. The point still stands.>Dolan confirmed to me by emailSame energy as "it came to me in a dream". Show the email, then.Unmarried childfree women are the happiest female demographic, and that's why marriage rates have plummeted.
>>23363049If married women were happy, they wouldn't divorce.
>>23363059No one is talking about absolutes, they are happier relative so single women. It is not that hard to understand.
>>23363063Except that divorce makes them return to the condition of being single, meaning that they prefer being unmarried to being married.
>>23362976Cringe and doesn't-believe-in-true-love-pilled.
>>23363049I think she will have to concede eventually. It is quite clear she is wrong.>>23363057>The point still standsIt doesn't. Dolan misunderstood the categories and this shows the opposite of what he (and you) claimed.>Same energy as "it came to me in a dream". Show the email, then.https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/18650969/married-women-miserable-fake-paul-dolan-happiness>Unmarried childfree women are the happiest female demographic, All the data shows otherwise. It shows they are the 2nd unhappiest group.You have 2 options. You either deny reality or you agree that unmarried childless women are the 2nd unhappiest group of women.Come on, it is not hard.
>>23363065And? We are not talking about what women prefer, we are talking about what makes them happy.
>>23363071Im not implying that at all I just think its based on more than any individual thing you want to focus in on.
>>23363076>It doesn'tYes it does. A present spouse can be intimidating, an absent spouse allows to speak more freely, though not as freely as a widow or a divorcee.I also asked for a source not a tabloid article linking twitter.>All the data The actual data points at an extreme decline in marriage and shows that people speak up when they are allowed to.
>>23363085What makes them happy is not being burdened by an unwanted man or unwanted children. >but my dataYour data is flawed. Please stop preying on innocent women, so many women are stuck in abusive marriages and want to escape.
>>23363101I was not talking about any of these things, are you ok?
>>23363106>I was not talking about any of these thingsDivorce kinda implies at least one of those things. Someone divorces a spouse that is not wanted anymore, ergo unwanted.
>>23363112People divorce for various reasons. You fixation on "unwanted men and children" is weird.
>>23363100>Yes it does. A present spouse can be intimidating, an absent spouse allows to speak more freely, though not as freely as a widow or a divorcee.The claim was that married women only claimed to be happy when their spouse was in the room with them, but that when they were alone they told they were unhappy. So, Dolan claimed that they only spoke the truth when alone.But this is not the truth. Dolan misinterpreted what "spouse absent" meant. Dolan himself recognized this.>I also asked for a source not a tabloid article linking twitter.You can ask Vox. I have never had the email .xml of any answer to journalists.>The actual data points at an extreme decline in marriage and shows that people speak up when they are allowed to.The data shows your theory was wrong. It shows that unmarried childless woman are not the happiest woman. They are far unhappier than married women.Come on, do it. Recognize you were wrong.
>>23363101The data clearly shows unmarried women are not happier. You are just grasping at straws.
>>23363115>People divorce for various reasonWhich all boil down to not wanting to be married to that person anymore.>>23363116>Dolan claimed that they only spoke the truth when aloneCan you prove him wrong? Can you prove they were not pressured and intimidating into lying when in the presence of their husbands?>You can ask VoxYou made the claim, you provide evidence.>The data shows your theory was wrong.I'm happy to recognize that marriage is still shit then even when only a few desperate souls get married nowadays. Sad, but not unexpected.Unmarried childfree women are still the happiest.
>>23363124As I said, your data is flawed. Please stop preying on innocent women, so many women are stuck in abusive marriages and want to escape.
>>23363130>Can you prove him wrong? Can you prove they were not pressured and intimidating into lying when in the presence of their husbands?Yes. The category doesn't mean they were not in the presence of their husbands.Married women who were alone (but still living with their spouses) and those who together with their husbands were in the same category.>You made the claim, you provide evidence.You are really grasping at straws. If Vox had lied, Dolan would have said so.>I'm happy to recognize that marriage is still shit then even when only a few desperate souls get married nowadays. Sad, but not unexpected.>Unmarried childfree women are still the happiest.Then, let's just give you another way out. Recognize you don't care about reality and that you hold your ideology as more important than data. Either that or recognize you were wrong.
>>23363132It is not flawed. It is data by the General Social Survey. It is about as reliable as you can get in the social sciences.
>>23363132Just observing basic reality women past a certain age without a husband children are complete miserable wrecks. Anyone who argues otherwise is some flavor of lunatic. The only question is which flavor. Old eggless woman? Bizarro leftist freak? Tranny?Which are you?
>>23363153>The category doesn't mean they were not in the presence of their husbandsIt doesn't mean they were in their presence, either. >Married women who were alone (but still living with their spouses) and those who together with their husbands were in the same category.That says nothing about the absent husband being present at the moment of questioning.>If Vox had lied, Dolan would have said so.You are giving this news source too much credit. People do not have the capability to spend all their time hunting down fake news, especially on minor outlets.
>>23363176>It doesn't mean they were in their presence, either.>That says nothing about the absent husband being present at the moment of questioning.I think you have closed your brain and you are incapable of understanding the point. Dolan made an error on what the category meant. This error made him give an interpretation that went against what every other dataset available shows (married women are happier).>You are giving this news source too much credit. People do not have the capability to spend all their time hunting down fake news, especially on minor outlets.If Dolan didn't recognize his mistake, it would be far worse for him.It is the difference between "he made a terrible mistake" (recognizing his mistake) and "he is intellectually dishonest" (not recognizing it).
>>23363196>Dolan made an error on what the category meantI still have to see Dolan admitting on this error. And again, it doesn't mean the absent husband was present to possibly intimidate, like in other cases.>If Dolan didn't recognize his mistake, it would be far worse for himIt would be far worse for the news outlet publishing fake news actually, if they were relevant that is.
>>23363209>I still have to see Dolan admitting on this error. And again, it doesn't mean the absent husband was present to possibly intimidate, like in other cases.You are not even being coherent right now. You are just grasping at straws.Dolan messed up regardless of him recognizing it (which he did) or not.He made a big, enormous mistake. A mistake that invalidates his claim totally. A mistake that if he were presenting it in an academic conference and someone pointed that out he would have to more or less say "yes, you are right" and stop the conference because his research was just invalidated.
>>23363238As requested, show the email exchange. Right now you are just clinging to a news article that isn't even reported in major source, nothing of substance that invalidates Dolan's claims.
>>23363256I think you are trolling if you can't understand the enormous mistake he did. No one is that dumb.I will copy here againHere is what he claimed>“Married people are happier than other population subgroups, but only when their spouse is in the room when they’re asked how happy they are. When the spouse is not present: f***ing miserable,” Dolan said, citing the American Time Use Survey, a national survey available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and used for academic research on how Americans live their lives.Here is why it is wrong>The problem? That finding is the result of a grievous misunderstanding on Dolan’s part of how the American Time Use Survey works. The people conducting the survey didn’t ask married people how happy they were, shoo their spouses out of the room, and then ask again. Dolan had misinterpreted one of the categories in the survey, “spouse absent,” which refers to married people whose partner is no longer living in their household, as meaning the spouse stepped out of the room.
>>23363269That doesn't say that the absent spouse was present at the moment of questioning, that's what you and your citation needed news rag don't get. No wonder you can't accept everyone shuns marriage.
>>23363269That’s a mistake a little child would make. It’s almost cute.
>>23363295>That doesn't say that the absent spouse was present at the moment of questioningCorrelation between this and the point = 0
At this point, I think the feminist is trying to do a Chewbacca defense in order to avoid saying she is wrong
>>23363346If you don't want to admit that clinging to some random fake news doesn't make you right, that's on you, dude. Nothing presented so far disproves that, absent the husband, women won't admit they are unhappy.
>>23363431>Nothing presented so far disproves that, absent the husband, women won't admit they are unhappy.You are not even understanding yourself what you are arguing.Come on, it is not that hard. Recognize the data shows unmarried women are not the happiest ones.
>>23363504Anon, I will say this and then stop replying because even I have shit to do. Stop clinging to fake news.
>>23363524>Fake newsThis doesn't mean what you think it does. Dolan made a mistake and didn't understand the meaning of the term. They didn't ask if a spouse was present while the poll was being made. Mostly because there is no good reason to ask this. You just need to be admit you were wrong. It is not right. All data shows unmarried childless women are not the happiest group.
>>23361529>Thread has 100 responses>OP has only gotten like 7 recommendations>Half of them were in the third postBruh.
>>23361537anime and manga have the magic of purification. A niche fetish.
>>23361529Imagine instead of sticking your willy or your hand through that hole you stick the muzzle of a shotgun through and blow her brains all over the walls of the stall.
Too be fair male sex addicts can't really "reform" either. I couldn't help but cheat on every girlfriend I have been with. Most of you dudes would be lying if you said you would pass up an opportunity to cheat if you know you wouldnt get caught
>>23363751I had the opportunity to cheat plenty of times and didn't. It's called having convictions. She still left me in the end so that fucking sucked but at least I don't get to feel too bad about all of this.
>>23361750your mom's been peer reviewed, nerd.
>>23361750Looks good to met. Peer
Here's a simple solution that worked for hundreds of thousands of years: women shouldn't have any rights
The Underground Man (almost)
Books (doujins) where a whore finds true love and does not reform?
>>23361529So nothing describing why the girl has such a low sense of self worth? Or why the guy can accept that and the "high body count"?
>>23361529Any books where love is discussed from the female perspective? Sort of like what Turgenev does so well for the man, but the other way around. Willing to read a female author on this one.
>>23363543>there is no good reason to ask thist. never interacted with a married womanAbused women are always putting up a facade while they try to escape.
>>23361638thanks for the reco.
>>23361727That's a blatant lie.
>>23362640Holy shit you're intellectually dishonest and argue in really bad faith.
Who would read that? Redditors? I can't imagine women enjoying it. Despite all the memes they spout, they have a hard time accepting they are the whore of the story.
>>23361529mushoko tensei (japan book)
>>23362933Marriage is just ok.Divorce exists for the sake of the cowards in our society, which are now majority and run the show, so they can bring down everybody to a safe average of risk x benefit
>>23362345>If you factor men in, sure, marriage provides ample benefits to men. We're talking about women though.Bait. Gotta be.
>>23361537Diamond... is unbreakable
>>23361529Tranime needs to get banned in every part of the world. Whores don't care about feeling, sex for them is very normal. Plus, they love cheating, no matter how Disney washed your brain, they have no hearts and men like you are disposable, enjoy watching chad fucking while you believe in true love and treating a whore like a princess. You are the reason why most women are retarded and think their vaginas are gold.Tranime is making men weak. Boomers were right trying to ban those cartoons.
>>23361529Glory hole girls don't look like that, ...which is why you can't see them.
>>23362970What about virgin women with virgin men, how it should be?
>>23361881Gruschenka never saw a black man in her life
Read this a long time ago. Almost seems like a lifetime ago. I remember enjoying it when I read it. I don't know how it holds up now.>California’s gold country, 1850. A time when men sold their souls for a bag of gold and women sold their bodies for a place to sleep. Angel expects nothing from men but betrayal. Sold into prostitution as a child, she survives by keeping her hatred alive. And what she hates most are the men who use her, leaving her empty and dead inside. >Then she meets Michael Hosea, a man who seeks his Father’s heart in everything. Michael obeys God’s call to marry Angel and to love her unconditionally. Slowly, day by day, he defies Angel’s every bitter expectation, until despite her resistance, her frozen heart begins to thaw. >But with her unexpected softening comes overwhelming feelings of unworthiness and fear. And so Angel runs. Back to the darkness, away from her husband’s pursuing love, terrified of the truth she no longer can deny: Her final healing must come from the One who loves her even more than Michael does…the One who will never let her go. >A powerful retelling of the story of Gomer and Hosea, Redeeming Love is a life-changing story of God’s unconditional, redemptive, all-consuming love.
>>23367202No normie watches anime enough to cause them to become weak. You didn't uncover a hidden phenomenon that hinders the activity of young males in process of becoming epic lone wolf sigmas who watch andrew tate and jordan peterson lectures and invest in bitcoin while mantaining nofap and mewing chad grindset routines, anon.
>>23361617I had no idea brothers karamazov was cuck lit. Thanks for trimming my reading list, anon.
>>23363543I admire you stamina when confronting abject stupidity.
