[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1712267165215070.jpg (95 KB, 1080x849)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
Books for learning grammar?
From beginner through to advanced. Thank you!
>>
white women will never have sex with you
>>
>>23361650
Have definitely proven that statement wrong. So what is a good book about grammar?
>>
French for Reading by Karl Sandberg
or
German for Reading by Karl Sandberg
>>
>>23361777
Checked. I actually have those already and that is a pretty smaet way of looking at it. Building blocks.
>>
bump
>>
>>23362090
bump
>>
>>23361646
Paul J Hopper A Short Course in Grammar
>>
>>23363375
Thank you! This looks great.
>>
Does Elements Of Style count?
>>
>>23361777
Will this help with English grammar though?
>>
>>23361646
Chicago Guide to Grammar, Punctuation, and Usage.
>>
File: IMG_1565.jpg (86 KB, 405x720)
86 KB
86 KB JPG
>>23364006
it counts in my books, anon.
op seems weird anyways
>>
>>23364210
Yes but in an abstracted way since english is franco-germanic
>>
>>23364266
weird how?
>>
>>23364006
>I believe the success of Elements to be one of the worst things to have happened to English language education in America in the past century. The book's style advice, largely vapid and obvious ("Do not overwrite"; "Be clear"), may do little damage; but the numerous statements about grammatical correctness are actually harmful. They are riddled with inaccuracies, uninformed by evidence, and marred by bungled analysis. Elements is a dogmatic bookful of bad usage advice, and the people who rely on it have no idea how badly off-beam its grammatical claims are.
>>
>>23364375
So what would be better?
>>
>>23364422
Following
>>
File: IMG_6079.gif (2.09 MB, 320x428)
2.09 MB
2.09 MB GIF
>>23361650
We all know what white women want
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3hIy6TRU8Tk
>>
>>23361646
Aristotle’s Categories, Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Grammar.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.