Trying to master Marx, Engels, Adam Smith, and Ricardo in ~2 weeks. Anyone have any advice for this? Im a very fast reader. I just want to do this to show communists their stuff isnt that deep
>>23539085That guy in the OP pic is a convicted pedo isn’t he?
>>23539088Or maybe it was “statutory rape”, I forget
>>23539085> I just want to do this to show communists their stuff isnt that deepThe test will be what your take on the Brenner debate is after those 2 weeks are up
>>23539088Yeah basically he was caught meeting a minor, went to prison, then died
>>23539095I think he committed suicide
>>23539085Marx wrote 200 years ago, you wouldn't even comprehend modern debates on the topic by just reading him
>>23539085You said nothing about how fast a comprehender you are. Given your project, I'm presuming you're as stupid as it is.
>>23539085Why do leftists always look like this?
>>23539085Adding to your stackBöhm-Bawerk‘s criticism of Marxist labour theory of value is worth reading, and a big part of why mainline economics did away with beardo. It’s in Capital and Interest but there are a hundred papers online you can find discussing it.
>>23539747No one has criticized the temporal single system interpretation or the value-form explanation, which is kind of a monetary theory (Heinrich, Rubin)
>>23539774II Rubin? Quite like him, good read.