[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0347.jpg (194 KB, 1029x1026)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
I hate for a thread to die just for my simple question, so how about a thread where you can ask small questions and get small answers.

Is there anything akin to an "encyclopedia of common literary allusion"? Say if I want to look up a reference in a book, anywhere from Greek to Biblical to Modern, without having access to the internet. I am not the most well read guy and I don't have a cell phone so this would be pretty helpful.
>>
>>23539959
The Encyclopedia Britannica maybe?
>>
>>23539959
>Common Knowledge: A Reader's Guide to Literary Allusions by David Grote
>Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, Giving the Derivation, Source, or Origin of Common Phrases, Allusions, and Words That Have a Tale to Tell by E.C. Brewer
>>
Is there a chronological reading list for philosophy anywhere? I've read the pre-socratics, plato and aristotle, but where do I go after that? Do I really skip ahead to middle ages? Doesn't that leave a massive gap?
I understand that there might be historical context I am missing.
>>
>>23539959
Do frogs actually treat their books like this? Disgusting.
>>
>>23539959
The fact that it's moliere ruins the dark academia tortured poet vibe the picture seems to be going for
>>
>>23539959
That's one poopy butthole
>>
>>23539959
The Oxford Dictionary of Reference and Allusion is probably the only one I am aware of.

I cannot tell if those are razor bumps or dessicated soap bubbles. Just shave with the goddamn grain if you cannot shave against correctly.
>>
>>23539959
This is more disgusting than Myanmar rebel beheading video
>>
>>23540665
NTA but thank you.
>>23539959
This picture makes me highly upset.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.