[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1700364705334.jpg (30 KB, 400x400)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
People always day "start with the Greeks" but which greeks? And then what... is Kant worth reading in these decadent times, or should I skip straight to Schmitt? Your thoughts pls
>>
commence with the Mycenaean scribes
>>
File: 1535171325.png (2.88 MB, 2392x3348)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB PNG
>>23559814
Based on the image and the contents of your post you should follow the traditional /pol/ philosophy chart. 1/2
>>
File: 1535171325-1.png (3.99 MB, 2248x3442)
3.99 MB
3.99 MB PNG
>>23559814
>>23559833
2/2
>>
>>23559814
Just start with Plato. You can ask Chatgpt to give you a list.
>>
>>23559833
>>23559837
Thank you for making me lose my time seeing a compilation as bad as this.

I mean, that's the definition of a pseud midwit list.
>>
>>23559814

This. Not even trying to be funny. If you're brand new to this shit start small. And if you see words you don't know the meaning of, look it up in a dictionary/thesaurus.
>>
>>23559865
It's the list that the /pol/fag OP deserves.
>>
>>23559865
>>23559892
>contributes nothing
>only whintes
Oh, no wonder /lit/ is shit right now, it's full of Eurotrash and /pol/whiners.
>>
>>23559905
You're the worst whiny faggot on this whole board right now, brownied.
>>
>>23559905
Feel free to go back.
>>
>>23559907
>>23559909
Thanks for proving me right.
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (74 KB, 1000x1000)
74 KB
74 KB JPG
In general yes. You should try to learn philosophy in chronological order.
>>
>>23559905
>Oh, no wonder /lit/ is shit right now
>now
/lit/ has always been shit.
>>
>>23559833
Thank you. I will start reading through all these now
>>
>>23559814
The greeks , unironically.
Philosophy isn’t a magic pill for better life , but it takes a lot of strength and balancing to achieve better life with the help of philosophy. Stoicism has the power to create robots with no sentiments; it is good as long as one understands ethics. It is better to learn ethics and politics (interpersonal relationships ) before proceeding to stoicism. You should read also Bhagavad-Gita— highly recommended reading.
>>
File: newhistory.jpg (91 KB, 650x1000)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
Read "A New History of Western Philosophy". It goes through pretty much all of it in 1100 and 4 parts. Part 1: Ancient; 2: Medieval; 3: Rise of Modern; 4: Modern philosophy.
They use this at university as well. If you don't have an attention span you can get the 550 page illustrated edition
>>
File: brief.jpg (201 KB, 946x1360)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
>>23560051
Picrel is much shorter and more suitable if you know absolutely nothing
>>
>>23559814
The best book to read for this is Passion of the western mind by Richard Tarnas.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.