[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 162050.jpg (27 KB, 608x342)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
Overrated
>>
>>23619402
Proof?
>>
>>23619402
I don't get the wank that he's way better than Byron or Shelley. They're about the same.
>>
>>23619449
Been thinking that too and I'm reading an anthology of all 3. Keats can often be so romantic and gushing as to be cloying.
>>
>>23619402
all British poets are overrated
English language is not fit for poetry
>>
>>23619449
>>23619517
Keats's best poems are better than Shelley's and Byron's (and almost all other English poets', for that matter), but the more typical Keats poem is on par with those by the other romantics.

>>23619553
Frog or Latinx?
>>
>>23619718
What would you say are his best? I really like Ode to a Nightingale and some of his sleep poems.
>>
>>23619553
the anti-english agenda here is really bizarre
>>
File: Sir-Walter-Scott-Author.jpg (205 KB, 1024x1024)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
>>23619402
>>23619438
>>23619449
>>23619718
Scott > Keats > Coleridge >Shelley > Byron > Blake >Wordsworth
Everyone in britain at the time recogonised scott as the greatest romantic poet
He is the most influential poet of the 19th century bar none
>>
>>23619732
The eve of St agnes is his best followed by Calidore and la belle dam sans merci
His odes are overrated
>>
File: rg10.png (494 KB, 1485x733)
494 KB
494 KB PNG
>>23619553
>>
>>23619553
Frenchie, we can agree that your country and England produced wonderful poets without silly shitposting. Any praise English poets received was well deserved, and well earnt.
>>
>>23619744
wordsworth is of course the most influential. not that being influential makes someone a better poet.
>>
>>23619744
>Blake and Wordsworth at the bottom
Wrongest.
>>
>>23619745
Oh yeah I remember St Agnes was good I think some of it went over my head tho
>>
>>23619744
>Blake after Shelley and Coleridge
Your list is otherwise fine.
>>
>>23619744
Based Scott appreciator.
>>
>>23619737
And it’s funny, posting on an American board with English speakers
>>
His reputation rests on a handful of poems, maybe ten at the most. But those few are as good as anyone has ever managed.
>>23619744
Big fan, but he's not even the best Scottish romantic poet (Burns of course). Scott is the best Romantic at long narrative poetry - only Byron comes close to him in that respect. Small wonder he went on to be a great novelist, he has a knack for pace and plot. /lit/izens who love the Iliad and medieval stuff are recommended Marmion.
Blake, Keats, Shelley never really cracked the long poem, the Prelude isn't really narrative in that way.
>>
>>23621117
>Keats never cracked the long poem

He died before he could
>>
>>23619744
Wholly braindead.
>>
>>23619402
No, he's not, but he was a fool.
>>
>>23619553
>ESL opinions
>they're shit
Return to the forums of your forefathers, barbarian.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.