>Love won't save us. We have to save love.Uhhh okay?
quite literally not in the book
>>23620527>>23620544>Love won't save us. We have to save love>quite literally not in the bookThen where did OP get it from? Was it just his interpretation of what the book is saying? The reason I'm asking is that it sounded kinda cool. The novel has been on my to-read list for a while, but that line piqued my interest.
>>23620563This actually sounds gay.
>>23620563idk but anons constantly attribute their own writings to big tomes like this to trick other anons into arguing about them.
>>23620568I'm an ESL
>Major Marvy sucks NIGGERS!Ummm yikes
>>23620563>They are in love. Fuck the war. Is the actual quote
>>23620527Not really a valid criticism, imho. Product of its time somewhat. Boomers love corny shit like that and some of what he wrote is like that. He wrote some other lines, whole sections really, that were really good.
>>23620600Ooooooooooooooooof
Is it officially over for American literature after he and delillo kick the bucket?
>Love won't save us. We have to save love
>>23620707Its so corny I love it>if it were any other writer you would've hated itTrue, still good
>>23620563
>>23620805He already died, we just won't find out until 2030
>>23620876Like that episode of Ghost in the Shell where the investment banker has been dead for a while, but the program he made to automate his investments keeps running. Tommy Pynch with two more novels ghostwritten by personal AI incoming.
>>23620887No, I will self-publish my next novel under Pynchon's name, and no one will realize. So you have to keep my secret, I'm only telling this to you.
