[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1d0.jpg (21 KB, 680x382)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
books are too insubstaclectic
>>
>>23620975
No they're PDFs, EPUBS, and DJVUs
>>
>>23620975
>insubstaclectic
>>
File: IMG_6168.jpg (170 KB, 720x960)
170 KB
170 KB JPG
>>23620975
insubstalick my balls.
Cute kitty tho.
>>
>>23620975
I say they're not insubstaclectic enough.
>>
File: GQZ-F0qXEAAKGc4.jpg (49 KB, 720x619)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
why don't we reuse/repurpose plastics to make books? wouldn't they last longer?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.