[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: emanuelle-kant.jpg (154 KB, 964x1388)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
I'm a neutral good kind of person. I don't abide by universal rules as much, for example, I don't object to stealing from rich people/companies, but stealing from common people is unacceptable. Likewise, violence is unacceptable when it comes to weaker people when it's not voluntary, but when conflict is voluntary and on equal grounds, then it's justifiable, but still should be avoided.
Immanuel Kant is far too universalistic for me.
>>
>>23625653
I dunno but have a bump
>>
>>23625653
>> neutral good
No such thing.
>>
>>23625653
The Merry Adventures of Robbin Hood?
>>
>>23625653
>personal code
Kant doesn't have one, he wants his little invention to be universal
>>
my moral is that everything is bad and wrong. everyone must die and they will



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.