My favorite writers are Frazer, Freud, Jung, Neumann, Vico, Darwin, Nietzsche, and GurdjieffWho else would I like?
>>23628305>Darwin, NietzscheLMAOyou have to be from the third world or this is a post from 2006 /r/atheism
>>23628305>>23628309low key those authors have a lot of wisdom
>>23628328Some of the others aren't bad but to put Darwin AND NEETzsche on a list together smacks of insane fossilized neckbeardery from 2006 or alternatively clueless poster from Vietnam or some shit who thinks this is edgy and cool>Verification not required.
>>23628309>>23628335I like writers who peel back the curtain or reinterpret the world on a vast scale. I know /lit/ treats writers as band t-shirts and proceeds accordingly according ideologies or identity politics but I expected better
>>23628360Sorry that (You) got triggered by an (accurate) roast of putting two neckbeard icons on your "favorite writers" thread, which is one of the most fart-huffing and lowest tier threads on this board to begin with
>>23628305Is this a real animal
>>23628382it's supposedly a deformed sloth :(
>>23628366Darwin is gay but Nietzsche is just gay through the lens of gays. If you actually know what he's saying he's semi-based but ultimately self defeating
>>23628382It's a mighty sea animal
>>23628305I like Dawkins. Obviously some neckbeardery amongst his fans, but don't let it put you off
>>23628382It's a feminist at the beach.
>>23628309Darwin is actually a really good writing. He keeps you to the book with his intrisinic skill with it and gives lucid depictions of the animals in his proofs he’s describing that you know what they look like pretty well by his great, and kin, observations.
>>23629059That isn't the issue. Nietzsche or Darwin on an authors list is respectable. Both at the same time is cringe as hell for the reasons outlied above.
