[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: rh-sapiens_1555597806.jpg (15 KB, 243x370)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
does this book provide some new unique insight or is just same regurgitated shit for midwits and housewives?
>>
Do animals have rights
>>
Suck my nuts, from the back.
>>
>>23816576
Sara pls
>>
>>23816448
What dumbass would even entertain the idea that some modernist, vile jew, neo-con/neo-lib could have any (more than 0) new ideas, even reformulated old ones, about the world and mankind?
>>
>>23816448
There’s better macrohistory out there.
>>
>>23817328
such as?
>>
>>23816448
the latter. he's also a neolib shill. I only found the chapter on the economics of infanticide even mildly interesting. everything else is just "imagine if you were a caveman whoooaaaaaa"
>>
Just read it you fucking faggot. For a 15 year old who doesn't know shit about history and shieet it's an ok book. For people who already read a lot it's pure goysloppery.
>>
It's kikeshite. End of thread.
>>
>>23817736
dawn of everything



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.