No.

>>23819825
Is it not similar though?

>>23819821
P*theism is based tho

>>23819825
Erm, I read the wikipedia article about Advaita Vedanta and says it's pretty much panentheism. Your response?

>>23819821
Evola is what we call a based retard.
There are better sources.

>>23819874
Many people who study Eastern traditions and psychoanalysts that are respected today got their information from books written by Evola. I think it's safe to say he had a pretty firm grasp on what Hermeticism and Buddhism is.

>>23819894
>psychoanalysts
k

>>23819914
Which denomination is the true one?

>>23819864
kill yourself

>>23819821
No.

>>23819894
Most of what gets from intermediary sources is alright, but his Sanskrit is pretty ass even simple differences like कलि vs कालि throw off his writings a lot. I would caution against using Evola alone or even as an introduction to eastern traditions. He understands some core concepts but take what he says with a grain of salt

So what you're really asking is if nondualism is panentheism, but why you're trying to answer this question in the context of Evola is beyond me. Even if Eastern texts themselves might seem daunting or too distant from your own tradition, Guénon (PBUH) is literally right there as the source Evola drew from.