>The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.
>>23979489emotional diatribe, get over it
Only trannies make threads about this cunt.
and the romans thought women were failed males, unable to bear the spark of male vitality. there is nothing new under the sun.
>>23979489She's biologically illiterate. Women only use one of their X chromosomes, the other is deactivated by the body and is practically genetically inert.
>>23979489if male are failed female explain why woman was made after man.
It's a parasite from outer space that lands on planets and confiscates lifeforms reproductive capabilities while being controlled by an interplanetary hivemind.
>>23979616It’s a parody of Aristotle
>>23979640No that's lesbians
>>23979640Geist?
>>23979489proof that they should not have gotten the vote
Men are born with the female idealization which makes then suffer. They want the female life at all cost, ie having hundreds of vaginas simping for them, but at the same time a kernel of cuckoldry remains in that men still crave for pleasing those hundreds of vaginas.Gays are a mid-point between a vagina and a man. They don't put women on pedestal but want to be serviced free of charge by hundreds of men, exactly like women. Gays will suffer tremendously because to get the female life they actually have to be females. Being half man half woman is a guaranteed failure.People who avoid suffering are not woman, not gay, not man. They can't be classified with those words.
>>23979489No, she was a ressentimental (in the Nietzschean sense) cunt helplessly seething at male superiority. The simple truth is that men are superior to women in all senses and that female "freedom" depends entirely on male goodwill.
>>23979489Does the second X activate in women?No?Cool, c-cool.
>>23979540Indeed
>>23979489>usual guesses are in the 7 million earth year range for futurity of Y chromosome contributions to genetic diversity.>having some misguided notion we will collectively make it that far in order to entertain some androgynous blob fantasies: plebian. >verdict: off with her head anyhow.
>>23980031Basically I attempted to bypass this in my writings by putting forth an advocacy of state sponsored forced intercourse.
>>23979489Lol, yes, the people who have achieved everything since ancient history were a genetic mistake.
A lot of the perceived weaknesses or relegtion of Women are actually strengths; the idea of staying home whilst someone else does the labor for instance displays a clear power structure where the Woman is above the Man. Men as kind of 'suicide drones' sent out to kill themselves bringing home food could account for the physical differences and the differences in states of mind from the male to female in our species. A smaller frame for Women, then, could even be theorized as an evolutionary strategy if the goal of the female, at a biological level, was to be considered harmless in the mind of the male; in need of protection so as to arouse his sympathies and desire to protect and feed her - there is etymology which confirms this; the notion and concept of (one) 'Wife' stemming from the germanic 'wif/waif' meaning 'Small Child' and Husband from House-Guard.As evolutionary strategy the difference of our species from most other species, where the female is larger and more physically violent, suggests a radical divergence occurring where Women at some point became content enough with their ability to have Men do what they wanted and fight their battles for them; not needing too these things themselves, so the frame and musculature was lost over time.Even the habit, seemingly, of Men to attack each when a perceived transgression against Women by a Man has take place suggests a deep hardwiring of Men to be completely subservient towards Women. I used to think this was pheromonal perhaps but with the internet e can see it occurs even when the Man is 'white knighting' for a static image of a Woman; i.e. no proximity nessecary for pheromones to account for it.There's no moral judgment being made about this, or anything. Really if Men are hardwired to be suici drones for Women then it only really matters what the goal of one Woman to the next is; whether they have intellect to make use of this position or whether they're stuck in the cave mentality, getting their tribe killed over demands for pretty bits of twig to put in their hair, etc.
>>23979640No that's accountants
She just needed more dick in her life. Then she wouldn't have seethed as much.
