Who is the Hegel of economics? Who is completely incomprehensible and at the end of the day says nothing and has had hundreds more books written about his work than he wrote himself?-
>>23981729>Who is the Hegel of economicsKarl Marx?
>>23981733Why do people say Marx or hell even like other classical economists like Smith are hard to understand? Nothing they say is going to blow your mind since more than half the shit they originated is now popular mainstream knowledge. Even if you opened capital or like skipped to a random page on a pdf, you'd understand it. Fuck you
>>23981733lmao.. this board is tragic
>>23981781>>23981733Marx is LITERALLY Hegel translated into the material-economic dimension. Also, to say that Hegel “says nothing” is ridiculous. He’s hard, but not impossible.>>23981733
Hell yes
>>23981807Hegel was being ironic when he wrote from Marx.
>>23981729Keynes might be a close fit to your criteria. Not that he had nothing to say, but he did blither and blather a lot, and he kind of became the sword that divided all of economics after him.
>>23981822This fucking board lmao....
>>23981729>the Hegel of economics>ubiquitously misappropriated and badly appliedKeynes.>>23981807>Marx is LITERALLY HegelBowdlerized and truncated, an exposition false Negative Infinite consciousness by a Rothschild step-cousin incahoots with British industrialists to degrade and debase continental power in a eugenic, population culling manner.
>>23981822are you really this illiterate? You do know Marx came AFTER Hegel right??
>>23981807Read ops post, then my response again shit for brains.
Marx.
>>23981831No? I don't give a fuck about commies anyway. Have fun reading about the utmost importance of sharing your wife, cuck. Kek
>>23981882>gommism is when my wife fucks her bbc bull
