[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1000024479.jpg (336 KB, 1400x1999)
336 KB
336 KB JPG
hello frens, is the canterbury classics edition of shakespeare's collected works (picrel) adequate for a first time reader of his plays / poems? if not, is there a /lit/ recommend edition?
>>
If you want a complete edition of Shakespeare you have two options which I have experience with, I'm sure there are others which are decent
The first is the Norton edition
Search it up and see what the used prices are like in your country
The second is the Riverside edition
I personally think the Riverside edition is the better edition, it contains better introductions and more notes but it's not remarkably better and so don't stretch your budget for it if you can get the Norton for like $10 but the Riverside is $100 used
Based on what I know about Canterbury Classics, you're going to get a cheap 'leather' edition with no notes so I don't think you should buy it
YMMV but my Norton edition has the first half of Midsummer Night's Dream underlined and highlighted and the rest of the book is untouched and my Riverside edition is completely untouched
You could also consider getting individual Arden or Oxford editions but I'm not sure what your goal is
>>
>>23982212
Idk what this book that is exactly but collected works of shakespeare weigh twenty pounds with tiny print, make sure to buy a set of books instead
>>
>>23982212
A few come to mind:
The Norton Shakespeare (0393934993) has everything you need—plays, essays, footnotes, historical context—in one massive (3536 pages!) volume for $50 -
$70. It's specifically written for undergraduates, so it's very accessible if you haven't read much of his work before, but it can be patronizing at times. The newer edition is in multiple volumes if you prefer, but it's far more expensive.

Another is the Oxford Shakespeare (9780199267170) which is a little more scholarly and cheaper ($40), but puts about the same amount of text in half the pages, so it can be physically hard to read at times.

I've heard great things about the RSC edition (0230200958 ) which was commissioned by the Royal Shakespeare Company and may be better than the Oxford Edition, but I don't own a copy myself to confirm that.

If price is your concern, you can get a paperback copy of the Pelican Shakespeare for $15 for a good scholarly edition.

I personally find the Canterbury Classics series to be a little garish in design and made for consumers to display rather than for study, but to my knowledge the text there is serviceable—you might get some slightly altered versions, but it shouldn't be too much of a problem. Hope you enjoy reading!
>>
>>23982212
There's a recent 400th anniversary facsimile of the first folio that was released in 2023 which has good reviews. It's available on Amazon and often goes on sale, too
>>
File: 1000020652.jpg (662 KB, 2048x1369)
662 KB
662 KB JPG
thanks for the replies, frens
>>23982261
>but I'm not sure what your goal is
i just want all the works in a single, readable book. it need not be heavily annotated or commentated since i don't mind going in deeper for a more heavily notated edition later if i feel driven towards deeper readings
>>23982273
>make sure to buy a set of books instead
if every collected works edition is lacking, i'll look into going this route, thanks anon
>>23982278
>you might get some slightly altered versions
what would be altered? as in shortened?
>Hope you enjoy reading!
thank you!
>>23982304
>There's a recent 400th anniversary facsimile of the first folio that was released in 2023 which has good reviews. It's available on Amazon and often goes on sale, too
i'll look into this edition too, thanks anon



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.