Post a review. Others guess the book.
>>24087596Anna Karenina
Why do you masochists do this to yourselves?
>>24087600Nope Hint it regularly makes the /lit/ top 100 charts
>>24087589(one star)
>ragereads
>>24087589Blood Meridian?
>>24087609another hint
>>24087634The Sun Also Rises?
>>24087596"Amused" leads me to suspect a comedy. "Very long" also narrows down the list. Don Quixote?
>>24087669No. Final hint!
>>24087679Nope, another hint, it was written and published in the 90’s
>>24087602People all love feeling superior to others. Some also enjoy getting angry. I wish janny would start earning his pay.
>>24087691Ohhhh, poor DFW lmao. "Buds that love it" should have been my hint lmao, I missed the subtle "dudebro" implication
>>24087627Nope
>>24087589Funniest answer would be Huck Finn. Is it Huck Finn?
>>24087700>>24087627I should've said, different review but same book as OP
>>24087698CORRECT
>>24087686Sounds based whoever wrote it. Guessing a Conrad or Lawrence novel?
>>24087686Flashman.
>>24087686This is definitely a Flashman book lol
>>24087730No>>24087738Winner!
>>24087738>>24087748>>24087750what is this fucking meme and when did it start. i used to go on /lit/ all the time and never once saw anyone talk about "Flashman"
>>24087751archives newfaggot
kek i love reading female reviews on everything other than romance slop
>>24087589Flashman
>>24087686Around the world in 80 days? Idk
We need something like goodreads except it excludes women. Then the ratings will actually reflect the quality of the book
>>24087702>>24087700>>24087627>>24087589More if the first review. It's written by a woman.
>>24087756>>24087771Women may read romanceslop and fantasyslop but men don't read at all, so women are still winning.
>>24087809Yes we do. We just pirate to our e reader. Whereas women buy hard copies because the aesthetics of their bookshelf is the most important thing for the femoid
>>24087809There are quite enough men on goodreads for women to be unnecessary. Even if women are 90% of the people there they fuck up the book ratings
>>24087589IJ?
>>24087771Just use goodreads and read the username before reading the review. It's not that hard.
>>24087929this except someone should make a browser extension that balances the number rating to exclude female voters
>>24087929The issue is the ratings
>>24087954Who cares about rating? The books with more ratings will always be the modern popular ones, despite women or men. If you delete all women from GR then the most rated books would be Stephen King and Sanderson. Classic books would still have low ratings becayse they are teached at highschool where teenagers cannot fully appreciate them.
>>24087888Female author. 1900s. Female protagonist.
>>24088020These aren't fun if the reviews don't give some sort of hint.
>>24087979The most rated doesn’t mean most highly rated. And most classic books aren’t read by teenagers for school, only a handful are
>>24087782>>24087589is it journey to the end of the night?
its a shallow reading of the book but i reckon someone might get it.
>>24088851Journey to the end of the night is written by a man, man. The OP book is also american
>>24087751It's a 1 faggot trying to spam shill this book in each and every thread everyday.
>>24087809Didn't Bloom say something to the effect of "I'd rather children not read at all than read Rowling/King?" That's how I feel. If you're reading about vampires eating ass, you're not really Reading™.
>>24087771Then it'll only have reviews of books you pretend to have already read.
>started reading Paprika by Tsutsui because I love the Kon movie>surprised to see it has a 3.19 on Goodreads>think to myself "Hm, maybe because the translation feels wooden at times?">every review is about misogyny, rape, and homophobia >all those things are in the movie, and the troons at Letterboxd give it a 4.1Goodreads sucks for ratings and reviews.
>>24089701Nobody on goodreads rates books as pretending to have read them except possibly shills
>>24087589Thanks for reminding me how fake and gay 2020 was.
>>24089687This is like saying if you aren’t watching movies like 400 Blows then it doesn’t count
>>24087782Women have such a hard time understanding that what the protagonist says isn’t necessarily what the author believes. Why is this?
>>24089757That's basically true. Avengers Endgame isn't cinema. For that matter, Taylor Swift isn't music.
>>24089762I think an inadequate ability to compartmentalize explains a lot. I think this inability to compartmentalize is associated with: 1. Tendency for greater "right brain" language and artistic skills with inferior "left brain" logic and mathematic skills2. Leftist political ideology3. Ideology infects everything else you do because you cant compartmentalizeThis is why leftoids dominate all media, they MUST propagandize, and they ARE retarded. 1 simple mental propensity explains everything. It also has a second order flywheel affect which is how they tend to take over insitiutions via ingroup bias.
>>24087820> they fuck up the book ratingsOnly on the top100 books to read before you die shit. Try looking beyond that and the fembots disappear from the userbase. If all you see is women reviews it’s a reflection of what you’re looking at.
>>24089757I’ve logged like 2000 movies on letterboxd. I think this is true. What a colossal waste of time. Maybe 200 of those were worth watching as an experience that changed my life somehow. The rest might as well have been playing tic tac toe.
>>24089633That’s not true.>>24087751I originally got recced it on /tv/ desu, but I’m a huge fan of historical fiction and it’s literally the best historical fiction series in existence.
>>24089762Men turn themselves into things, Women turn things into themselves. This disconnect between "what I am doing" and "who I am" does not exist for women, they exist in a far more imminent and vividly non-abstract way, and this makes it difficult for them to grasp the idea that the writer and character are discrete entities.This is of course not uniformly true and it is a matter of degrees but this is my assessment after decades of studying foids. It is the source of their immense social awareness, because they feel and see relationships in real-time in higher resolution than men do, but it also makes them very inept at navigating impersonal philosophic questions.
>>24087782>roastie reviewer>very small profile pic, but still: physiognomy check failed>I've had this novel praised to me so many times that I idolized it for years before I even bought it. I was so scared that I wouldn't like it>"the time the novel was written in">only managed to get a quarter of the way into the book>uses leftist purity-spiraling as an excuse for her own illiteracy>novel was written by a woman, according to OP>>24089615>specifically an American woman>>24087589Okay, I think I have a pretty good guess, OP. I hate women, and I hate Sylvia Plath in particular.
>>24087782Bitch is Tunisian. How fall have we fallen Muslim bros? Is this our future?
>>24089886100% the bell jar
>>24089886>>24089891Bravo, bravo. It was the Bell Jar.>>24089762In this case specifically the protagonist is just the author
>>24089886>>very small profile pic, but still: physiognomy check failedhad me rolling
Guess who?
>>24087589Mein Kampf
>>24090300Very brave of her to point out Hitler's widely ignored racism
>>24090298
OP this thread is gay tell what the books are ffs
>>24090305And the ass saw an Angel ?
>>24090313Op said it was the bell jar
My favorite review
>>24087782This has to be gone with the wind. Scarlett calls them uppity niggers, field niggers, house Niggers, and Yankee niggers
>>24090341average goodreads userif I got a penny for every time a review on goodreads contains the word "misogynistic", I'd be a millionaire
>>24090341lolIf the title is like "A modern woman's perspective on 20th century society" or some shit they MIGHT have a point
>>24089629Isn't this pretty obvious? Fahrenheit 451>>24090305Catcher in the rye?
>>24090407It’s not it’s a beloved classic of depression era lit that’s short
Toilet Sweat remains the most powerful literary critic of all time
>>24087596Anything by Steven King>>24087600illiterate retard
>>24090518Shameless self shilling
>>24090518Bad: obvious mental illnessWorse: Bri ish spelling
>>24090518>dash + semi-colon combowhat in the god damn...?
>>24090626He's beyond you. Sorry.
>>24092022I strive to learn...
My favorite review:
>>24093909Demons?
>>24093913Nope. Hint: written by a w*man
>>24093918my mom says to tell you pride and prejudice, and she calls mr. morgan an asshole.
>>24094024Tell your mom she's correct!
>>24093142Conan
>>24093909The great gatsby?
>>24094054see>>24094024
>>24093142Lord of the rings
>>24094063Some Edgar Rice Burroughs book I imagine, but I haven't read enough of him to know which one.
>>24094073Wait, never mind. I change my guess to Conan the Barbarian, it fits better.
>>24094063flashy
>>24087686James Bond
>>24094092I swear to god I'm gonna get pissed if this is it. WE ALREADY HAD A FLASHMAN REVIEW, STOP POSTING YOUR STUPID FUCKING MEME BOOK NO ONE HAS READ IN THIS THREAD YOU STUPID CUNTS
>>24094098>>24094092No. It’s a horror book.
>>24094327To Kill a Mockingbird?
>>24094392Robinson Crusoe top review
>>24090529Russian slop readers are so tiresome. Just because a book is long and the author thinks they are very smart and wise doesn't make it a good book.
which one of you is this
>>24094599Dude: the side nigga caught feelings.
>>24090341Jesus Christ what happened to Penelope’s makeup?
>>24093909Pretty sure I saw it before and it’s War and Peace
>>24094874A man told her twice.
>>24094327What word is she censoring?
>>24095116Lolita
5/5
>>24095826Whitey
