I was prepared to hate , but that Moby Dickens cover in fact is very perfect . Huge and strange , like the book
>>24087607That's a terrible book cover. It thinks it's clever but it's too contrived.>>24087612Authors' faces should not be on book covers.
>>24087952great cover. Terrible translation. glad that I got it for free.
>>24088816For me it really rouses a kind of megalophobia in me, even I don't have one. I agree with the autors statement, though.
/thread
>>24090625kino cover. terrible slop of a book
simple as
>>24087607
>>24087607Obligatory Wordsworth rep.
>>24088838Stoner was originally written in English, it’s not translated. But I agree, great cover.
>>24091040Relax esl she wasn’t making that comment about stoner
>>24087607Wish it was real.
goes hard
Just picked up this bad boy
>>24090642is that jim Carrey?
>>24091040i was talking about that penguin edition of demons. the translation in it is very recent and it sucks compared to p&v and Garnett.
>>24091097This
I don't know about good but I have the WORST cover of Dracula in the world.
>>24092940Wordsworth probably has a worse cover than that but this thread is about best book covers and for me these bram stoker's dracula covers are great
>>24092940
>>24093203not even close.
>>24093173>>24093203>>24093211>>24092940too cheap. instantly not scary. there was never a good cover for Dracula. even the original yellow one was bad. all of these covers suck dick and balls until blood flows.
>>24091097Only noteworthy one ITT
>>24092712I thought it was James Franco lol
>>24088838Which is the better translation for demons?
>>24087607Are you a teenage girl? Grow up. Who gives a shit about book covers?
>>24094786
>>24093772i prefer this edition. he's meant to look phyically unimposing. yours is good too, and we both know there's worse.
>>24090642I despised it but it really is a great covee
>>24087952>>24088838>>24090625>>24090642>>24091018>>24091291I like these
>>24094827literally me
