Any books that explains why Western governments are run by Incompetent, spiteful, complacent HR women? How did this ever come about?Pic related is Jacqui Smith>British politician, broadcaster and life peer who has been serving as Minister of State for Skills and Government spokesperson for Equalities since 2024.[1][2] A member of the Labour Party, she was Member of Parliament (MP) for Redditch from 1997 to 2010. Smith previously served as Home Secretary under Gordon Brown from 2007 to 2009 and was the first woman to hold the position.>Smith became the first female Home Secretary. She resigned as Home Secretary in June 2009 following her involvement in the parliamentary expenses scandal in which she had falsely claimed that a room in her sister's house was her main home;[3] she was also the subject of controversy after it emerged that her husband had used taxpayer money to purchase pornographic videos. Smith, one of the highest profile figures involved in the scandal, then lost her seat as MP for Redditch in the 2010 general election. Between leaving the House of Commons and rejoining the government in 2024, she remained in public life as a political pundit and took up roles in various other sectors, such as health and media.
>the UK is just like all the other western governmentsHave you heard of Napoleon?
>>24093706>reddit politician>cucked by pornpotterybooks er Infinite Jest
>>24093706The manipulated manAnatomy of female powerThe war against boys
>>24094987but do these explain OP
If women are in charge of managing something that means it doesn't require management.
there's still no book about it because it started in the 80s, and atheists have very poor insights in general, and ever since WW2 in particular, let alone from the 80s onwards
>>24093706The major problem with MPs in the UK is how the FPTP system works. It means that parties select politicians primarily for their ability to win elections and not for their ability to, for example, parse and understand legislature or formulate policy. Now even though there are "safe" seats that you could potentially slot a legal savant into, you then come into the issue that it's the local party for the seat that selects their candidate. The degree to which you can insert a preferred candidate is based largely on the charisma and personal authority of the party leader. A strong leader can insert preferred candidates easily, while a weak leader will be told to fuck off by the local party apparatus.The local party apparatus is itself largely controlled by a recognisable type of personality, the Activist. What the Activist personality wants is to select candidates like themselves, who tend to be A. highly social and B. highly focused on a particular hobby horse.
>MP for Redditchsounds about white
>>24095144A-level tier analysisFirst of all, you would expect a party to choose its representatives partly based on the ability to win elections no matter the system. FPTP is nothing special in this regard.Secondly, the parties - outside of Reform, because they are not an entrenched party with brand loyalty - do not select for the ability to win elections. Just at the trash in the House. Or just read their own selection procedures. They select for blind obedience, ideological commitment and more and more the correct skin colour (brown), explicitly so for the Tories since Cameron. The Commons does not meaningfully legislate any more so they don't need to worry about that.
>>24095530>Reform, because they are not an entrenched party with brand loyalty -Nigel Farage has immense brand loyalty. Reform itself has none of that. Its candidates do not need to have any ideology or commitment because their mandate comes from being m8s with Farage.
>>24095530>correct skin colour (brown)Lmao get fucked>A-level tier analysisAbsolutely Dunning-Kruger. /pol/tards should never be allowed to comment on politics.>They select for blind obedience, ideological commitmentThat's literally explicitly laid out in my post, D-K special school retard.
>>24093706This is more of a specifically British problem. Churchill sold the country out to Jews, deliberately and without shame, and the Jews openly stated that their intention was to destroy Britain and its people and replace them with 60 IQ browns and women who would be more ameniable to communism.Being cuckolds by nature, the British just went along with this. The reason that the UK's government is so surprised that people are outraged by the mass rape of their daughters by brown people is that they were under the impression that the British people KNEW that they had signed on to be raped and displaced in their own homeland. This is the consensus opinion of the British ruling class, that white people deserve to be raped and murdered in their own homelands and that resisting it makes you a Nazi. This is not some controversial opinion, but the majority opinion of the educated neoliberal elite.
>>24093706Rather than a book, I recommend you start reading Dominic Cumming's Substack.His 2014 essay about government dysfunction, the Hollow men, is around 25.000 words.part 1:https://dominiccummings.com/2014/06/16/gesture-without-motion-from-the-hollow-men-in-the-bubble-and-a-free-simple-idea-to-improve-things-a-lot-which-could-be-implemented-in-one-day-part-i/Part 2:https://dominiccummings.com/2014/10/30/the-hollow-men-ii-some-reflections-on-westminster-and-whitehall-dysfunction/
>>24095583Your skin is the colour of shit
>>24095696Your brain made of shit.
>>24095583Dunning-Kruger isnt real
>>24095625You are brown
>>24093718He's heard of Elon and figures that's close enough
Someone should write this book you dont even really need a high IQ to understand the principles. >government institutions primary purpose is always to get more money and preserve itself. They are even allowed to lobby for this>individuals within the institutions are each playing a game where their primary goal is to be the boss of the greatest number of people, thereby conferring power and justifying a high salary. This leads to neverending expansion in the number of employees, and redundancy. >incompetence of government agencies only secures them MORE funding in the future>Leftoids tend to employ religious type thinking where a persons adherence to the ideology far more important than competenceThese are just the factors off the top of my head I am sure there are a lot more you could identify and write about.
>>24095625>This is more of a specifically British problem>Janet Louise Yellen (born August 13, 1946) is an American economist, currently serving as the 78th United States secretary of the treasury since January 26, 2021. She previously served as the 15th chair of the Federal Reserve from 2014 to 2018. She is the first woman to hold either post, and has also led the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Yellen is the Eugene E. and Catherine M. Trefethen Professor of Business Administration and Economics at the University of California, Berkeley.
>>24095884They are just bongland 2.0, like ozzies and leafs
>>24095835Regarding points 1 through 3, the 1980's British tv-show Yes Minister is basically a documentary on this.And personally, I view it as required viewing for anyone interested in government dysfuntion and the workings of so-called western liberal democracies.The following quote from S1E03 of yes prime minister came to mind when reading your comment:>"The treasury doesn't figure out what it needs to spend and then think how to raise the money. They pitch for as much as they think they can get away with and figure out what to spend it on!"-Sir Humphrey Applebee
