Anyone else summarizes non-fiction books with ChatGPT? Since most of these books are filled with padding anyway, it's a great way to extract the insights and the relevant info and move on to the next book. If something is really important you can also find out which part is it and just read the important parts of the book. I've been spending so much time reading book summaries using it.
ChatGPT is not reliable enough for that. Hell, it told me that Dynasty: The Rise and Fall of the House of Caesar was one of the best books on the Flavian dynasty ChatGPT is pretty solid for nonprofessional STEM related things, especially questions related to mathematics, but it isn’t very good for humanities. I’d trust Wikipedia much more, and I’d trust academic books much more than Wikipedia
Non-fiction books are not just about info dumping, anon. AI is useless for philosophy and human thinking. Maybe you are thinking of textbooks, but even so, it's always best to have your content curated.
>>24094018>he reads nonfiction for informationYikers
>>24094018No they didn't
>>24094018nice to finally meet someone whom pic related was for
>>24094115Turn purple prose into good prose resembling Hemingway?
>>24094172Least retarded Hemingway fan.
I don't want to use that anymore it's not a robot but an actual person who's giving me random answers methinks. I understood that AI is advanced nowadays but please don't use it to trick me ever again my bad.
>>24094018>summarizes non-fiction bookshow does that make the books obsolete?
>>24094018Wikipedia already did a while ago.But you're missing out by not reading some of them, still. The Incerto bundle is one of my favorite /sci/ shitposts.
>>24094172was Hemingway a genius or a retard?
>>24094018I hate that I'm going to spend the rest of my life sharing a culture with people like you.
