>"Well, well, well, what do we have here? "Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit." More like Hegel's Fuckomenology of Bullshit. Let me tell you, this book is fucked up. Just look at the first fucking sentence! "It is customary to preface a book with an explanation of the author's aim"? Yeah, I fuckin' hope so! But get this: "In the case of a philosophical work, however, such an explanation seems not only superfluous, but even inappropriate and misleading"?! What the fuck? Why even put this fucking garbage in the book if you're just going to tell us that you aren't going to explain anything What were they THINKING!? I don't suppose I can use Game Genie to find out. [clip of AVGN trying to put a game genie on the book like it's an NES cartridge] And why is the preface longer than the introduction? Let's just skip to the first real chapter, "Sense Certainty." Yeah, I'm certain that I sense some fuckin' bullshit."
he is literally the father of dialectical thinking, don't read this without at least doing some prep with the SEP
>>24111030
>>24111041>dialectical thinkingThe one that ?
>>24111047that one that !?
>>241110431 is the best by far, 2 and 3 are complete crap.
>>24111030Thank Napoleon for fucking up Hegel's magnum-opus.
