I find it difficult to approach any significant post-war western philosopher/social theorist who held a prominent position in academia for many years without thinking that they're glowies. Richard Rorty is a prime example of this. So is Dennett.
>>24117959Bordieu
>>24118088Lacan as well. He has to be.
>>24117959Do glowies have ghostwriters? If so, who are they?
>>24117959Dennett has fuckall interesting to say, why would he be a glowie and not just some careerist? These tenure positions where you can sit around doing whatever the fuck you want are just there as a carrot for the underlings, but nevertheless *someone*'s gotta hold them still.
>>24118274John Grisham actually was Bill Clinton
Glowies work in the psychology, CS, and business departments. Nobody reads philosophy so it would be a waste of resources. Rorty is just your standard true believer with all brains and no character
>>24118776>Rorty is just your standard true believer with all brains and no characterKWAB
