>I leave to others the decision as to the good or evil tendencies of my character, but such as it is it shines upon my countenance, and there it can easily be detected by any physiognomist. It is only on the fact that character can be read; there it lies exposed to the view. It is worthy of remark that men who have no peculiar cast of countenance, and there are a great many such men, are likewise totally deficient in peculiar characteristics, and we may establish the rule that the varieties in physiognomy are equal to the differences in character.
>>24118369>clicks image >not an image of spinozaThis either agrees with Spinoza, and is correct, or disagrees with Spinoza, and is wrong. I didn't read the passage.
>>24118376He speaks against Spinoza
