Bros.... I think i'm in love....
default pic is wearing an "I love my boyfriend" shirt and you think that type of person is worth watching?
>>24118946Buy an add
>>24118960You are a fucking retard if you think a goddess would use this forum
>>24118946Everyone who posts booktubers should get permabanned, booktubers should have their own general but it should be on /trash/. Booktube fans are to this board what kpop fans are to /mu/
>>24118956It's to ward off losers and incels like you.
>>24118946>I LOVE WITTGENSTEINkek, why is she trying to cultivate a male audience? booktubers do best when they cater to YA slop
>>24118967Funny that you say that while there are always at least 3 active IJ/DFW threads at all times that are virtually carbon copies of each other.
>>24118956https://youtu.be/mDise_Em_Ug?si=l-3jjDcuJeEzHN3E
>>24118981She's different.
>>24118956i know i am not going to put my penis inside of her regardless of her relationship status. imagine actually caring about if the women you watch are getting dicked or not.
Could someone post the pic of when /lit/ made a girl delete her newly created YouTube channel because of sexual comments and insults? That same girl later turned out to become a somewhat famous YouTuber and posted her tits on Instagram or something like that kek
Why is it so hard to connect with readers irl? All the girls I've gone on dates just wanna look like they read because "it's cute."
>>24119016it indicates shes a conniving attention whore feminist type with a reprehensible personality
>>24118946>literally holden caulfieldcringe as fuckand also buy an ad you dumb bitch
>>24118956Probably puts her in the top 1% of women
I'm thinking of becoming a booktuber in a few months... would you kind anons at least not bully me?
>validAren’t these book channels just flimsily-hidden eceleb channels? Like, if you’re an attractive male you start a book review channel?
>>24119018It's amazing how you've turned the situation into a /pol/ caricature to serve your own personal narrative. Barely any truth in your post. Just the barebone facts that a Youtuber posted to /lit/ deleted her channel (for a time) because of sexual comments. The latter part you're referring to is that it was discovered she was an amateur model and did some nude arty photoshoots as well as posing nude for a painting. Ironic considering the reason she deleted her booktube. The lesson: even the innocent girls are animalistic whores.
>>24119242I remember this anon who did that. He made one or two videos and gave up. I wish he hadn't because it felt cool to support an anon. I think he gave up because zero traction and he probably got made fun of for looking like a fat lesbian.
>>24118956Of course she is. Why not?>>24118946I like her
>>24119294do you remember the channel's name?
>>24119332KatieReadsClassicBooksThat's not her channel name now. Nor was she evey Youtube famous with any of her channels.
>>24118946buy an add
>>24119332>>24119339Sorry I saw the (You) but not to which comment. That anon deleted his channel. It's gone. He made a #WelcometoBooktube video introducing himself, and then he made a video about some recent history books he had read. I think they were Roman history books. I think his name Anthony or some Italian name that begins with A.
