>book gets published to relative success in UK>advance copies are handed out to people ahead of US release>some people suspect it is AI given how it is written and how wildly inconsistent the plot is>author says she didn't use AI and that this is ruining her reputation>follows up by saying if any AI was used it was by an editor after the fact and no she doesn't know the editors name, who he/she works for, or anything about it just that it wasn't her>book release gets cancelledThere is a ton of AI slop on amazon self release, but this is the first famous example of it happening with traditional publishing. Beyond the embarrassment what this will probably cause is a complete distrust of anything written post-AI and people more than ever reading older books. You can't trust anything published anymore.
>shy girloxymoronGirls aren't actually shy, they put it on as a costume
The ancients won. The moderns lost.
>>25156180we all knew that anonbut now we know about your hyperfixation
>>25156180So I looked up the plot and this is hilarious>Protag is broke so she signs up to be a sugar baby>meets guy who offers to take her in, but only on the condition that she turns into an actual dog>the longer she stays as a dog the more "animalistic" she becomesAccording to one review there are sections of the book where she is supposed to be a dog, but the AI forgets and has her picking things up or wearing clothes like a normal human
>>25156188This says a lot about society and the patriarchy
>>25156177WE ALREADY HAVE A THREAD ABOUT THIS YOU STUPID IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>25156188Concrete sign that the white men who control publishing have overstayed their welcome.
>>25156664>white men who control publishing
>>25156177You should have posted the cover with the authors glazing the book.>>25156670>>25156664Let's check the Big Five of publishing.>Hachette Book GroupCEO: David Shelley (male)>HarperCollinsCEO: Brian Murray (male)>Penguin Random HouseCEO: Markus Dohle (male)>Simon & SchusterCEO: Jonathan Karp (male)>Macmillan PublishersCEO: Jon Yaged (male)
>>25156684>authors glazing the bookI've never heard of either of them, they seem to be made up by AI too.
>>25156607it's the same chud who made 3 concurrent threads about the asian chick writing about her white boyfriend.
>>25156607Do we? I did a lazy search and didn't see one. My bad.
>>25157603>>25152810
>>25156188Why the fuck was she too lazy to proof-read the AI slop?
>>25156177AI will substitute us all eventually.It will start with shit books like these, but I've already been able to generate poems in the style of Yeats or Eliot with genuinely good lines, one or two, amid long sequences of bad ones. Three years ago it couldn't generate one single good line, it couldn't even properly write meter.And I do it with laughably simple prompts. In the future people will do things like>give AI a massive, detailed stylistic analysis prompt generated by AI itself>feed it the complete works of Milton + all authors who influenced Milton>the AI will analyze the style of Milton in ways Milton himself couldn't possibly have done, and therefore be able to replicate it>tell it to translate the Aeneid in the style of MiltonAnd there you have it: there will be an Aeneid translation whose English style is as good as that of Paradise Lost. If an actual translation by Milton were somehow discovered, and you gave the real one and the AI one to Milton's foremost scholar, he wouldn't be able to tell them apart.You'll also be able to feed the AI, say, an English history and tell it to write Shakespeare-like plays about the English kings Shakespeare didn't write about, in styles congenial to their era, so a series of plays on Queen Victoria in the style of Swinburne, for example (if that's what you want). Or the entire history of Rome in the style of Virgil...There will be literally no reason to write books anymore other than self-expression.Even if you wish to write your own autobiography, you'll be able to just give your data to the AI (which it will have already, btw) and it will generate a perfect version of it in the style of Shakespeare or Dante or Homer, a better one than you yourself could have written.I think this will happen in maybe 50-100 years. We may be alive to see it.
>>25156188One review pointed out that the antagonist gets mad at her for sneezing (because dogs can't sneeze), but then he gives her books to read when she's alone (because dogs can read).
>>25156188The book may be AI slop but you sound like a retard in thinking this woman turned into a literal dog, rather than understanding it's a sex-thing where she PRETENDS to be a dog.
It ain't over
>>25156177>You can't trust anything anymore.fify
>>25159220>(which it will have already, btw)it's the only actual problem about the entire thing; everything else is just a distraction. Eventually someone will get their hands on a tool that knows you better than you do yourself
Indians fucking worship AIThe majority of the world is soulless Soulful white people are over
>>25159220>AI will substitute us all eventuallyYou can't get copyright if you use ai. Also, publishers might demand draft manuscripts
Who exactly is Mia Ballard?
>>25158008Because most people actually think AI is intelligent.
>>25161845A black tranny (male) gooner
>>25156177Now I feel the urge to go rub this in the face of all those BookTubers who shilled this nonsense to me
i don't read anything written after 2010 so idgaf
>>25156684Menbros... our response??
>>25162797We’ll always be large and in charge haha.
>>25156684Jarvis, check their Early Life section
>>25161845Picture a black zoomer who watches so much pornography that he acquires autogynephilia as a matter of course.
>>25159662it's a horror book, she really does become a dog in the context of the book
