Remember when /m/ used to thought Go Nagai was a good artist? Yeah, good thing we are past that phase. Average pixiv slop looks better
>>22938649Art is subjective fag.
>>22938649>used to thoughtRetard can't even conjugate and he wants to talk shit about his betters.
>>22938664>>22938752>replying to bait
I think 70s Nagai isn't the worst, obviously worse than a lot of his contemporaries, but he makes up for it with content.90s Nagai on the other hand...
>>22939515I think go is actually the best manga artist of his time.He literally drew everything and anything.
>>22940057You haven't read enough manga. He's way behind the likes of Tezuka, Ishinomori and Yokoyama.
>>22938649rather irrelevant when his art don't even look like that anymore, keep up dammit!
>>22940950Yeah, it looks worse as pointed out here: >>22939515
>>22940751>way behindHe's not but I agree there are many better than him.
>>22940950>That picI like that all of Nagai's MC's that usually have a Monster/Human transformation, all look the same. Canonically and as a symbol that they are the MC. There is a "spider" of all of Go's works connecting into the middle of the web. Like when Akira was in Mazinsaga. It all fits perfectly when you look from a specific angle.
>>22938649'Art' as in drawing or 'art' as in panelling?
>>22940950Whats this? Devilman Saga or some Mao Dante story?
