These are the most pretentious stupidest shit ever.
>>122578311Whats pretentious about it? Explain your case
>>122578311Headless guitars were at one point nice tradeoffs. They look hideous but since they had no fashion buyers they often put emphasis on "good shit for a reasonable price". Not sure if that's still true....
If you need anything other than a strat you fucking suck
>>122578602I need an acoustic guitar and I don’t need a strat.
no one on this fucking retard website knows what words mean anymore
>>122578311Has anyone tried these headless Ibanez guitars? I've got a strandberg, wondering how they hold up in comparison
>>122578311wrong
>>122578602>stratmogged by les paul
>>122578656That was based on a Bob Dylan doodle.
>>122578656ACKNOWLEDGE MEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=KbEJjuJJzhg
>>122578519>>122578699Now Thats What I Call Pretentious
>>122578602I don't like guitars made of plastic
>>122578311.
>>122578519I don’t think we are gonna get an answer, no matter how stupid it was gonna be :(
>>122578596Completely idiotic take. They are not now, nor were they ever, a "trade off". They were and still are an objectively improved evolution in the design. In all aspects of function they are superior to headful guitars by a considerable margin. This comes at no expense either, because not only are their looks a matter of taste, but there is not a single fan anywhere in the world who will stop listening to your music if you recorded it with a headless. Most headless are more expensive than most guitars, but rondo music sells them at a more affordable price. If you disagree with a single word of this you're either a dumbfuck boomer or cargo cultist who thinks you'll be like rock heroes of yore if you use their same ancient, pre-evolved gear. There are only two things headless do not do, and that is Floyd Rose and acoustic. They probably can't do 12 string either. But for everything else, they are every bit a functional upgrade as the computer is from the 8 track.
>>122578673>les paul>over strat>not choosing a telecaster>or a gibson sg>not choosing a strat with hot rails pathetictake your wonky and gay les paul out of here.
>>122578673The Les Paul was really ahead of its time. It's the only guitar that will always quickly and easily convert into a proper headless.
>>122580616i like telecasters a lot too. SGs are cool until you turn 30
>>122580853I don't necessarily disagree, but the whole trolling and immature ad hominems aside, i honestly do find the les paul to be a tad bit too wide, clunky, and wonky.Is it classic? Sure, but personally, i think i'd rather a strat or a telecaster.A tele sort of has the best of both worlds, murky, muddy, but still a fender. Not as bright as a strat, not as full blown muddy as a les paul.It is dirty but although i give les paul shit for being wonky, the tele is kind of stiff and rigid in its own right.
>>122578656Calm your strings Pat Mettheney
>>122578602Strat is safe boomer choice for those who have no clue but want to be on safe side.Get an SG ibanez. Its a better strat. It has humbuckers and a properly working trem.>>122578673Shit paul is boomers wrong choice. Its meme marketing bait, the iphone of guitars. This shit cant even stay in tune
I just want a Vandenberg so bad bros
>>122581526THEN FUCKING BUY IT AND STICK IT UP YOUR ASS HOLY SHIT
>>122578311Yeah they look gay honestly. Stringed instruments without headstocks is just a cash grab for originality.
>>122581685Rude.
>>122581733Why do you need a headstock?
>>122578311circumcised guitars
Is this kino? I want one
