Have you come to terms with the fact that this is a good album?
Not good. No roger waters
>>122589770I always knew it was good. Not the best Pink Floyd album by any means but still good!
of course
I always thought it was good.
Six out of ten
>>122589770Good? It's the only one I like.
>>122589770Mostly decent prog muzak but then the album closes with High Hopes
>>122589770Since Gilmour was capable of writing songs like Dogs and High Hopes, it's no wonder Rog was upset that he was being so goddamn lazy about contributing.
>>122591051Whats wrong with High Hopes?
>>122589770Cluster one is good >>122591516
>>122591516It insists upon itself
>>122589770this album came out when i was 3i knew it was kino then and i still know it now>>122589863roger would make the album better but he was also a massive twat by this point so he'd probably sabotage it more than anything else>>122591516nothing is wrong with high hopes, the anon probably just doesn't like when polly writes lyrics
>>122591516He implied that the album is decent but High Hopes is far above the rest
>>122589770GOTTA KEEP MY EYE ON THE CIRCLE IN THE SKY
>>122592259Anon, wrong album.
>>122589770Gilmour is a masterful guitarist, but as an artist he has nothing to sayhis music is mostly very shallow and sterile, although nice to listen toit's only when paired with Roger that he could properly make songs that were not just aesthetically appealing, but also interesting and poignant
>>122592307I knew I had that wrong
>>122589770Yes, I always liked this album. i prefer it over The Final Cut by a long shot.
