[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/mu/ - Music


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1718546055025105.jpg (568 KB, 1484x2048)
568 KB
568 KB JPG
>someone claims vinyl has more "warmth" and "sounds superior to digital"
>his entire collection is mediocre rock albums
>not a single classical recording
>maybe one copy of Kind Od Blue he never listens to byt keeps around to pretend to be into jazz
>>
Classical sounds better on vinyl because all recordings with half decent singing are on 78rpms
>>
>>122913152
Why hasnt there been any attempt to remaster those with AI?
>>
Classical is best expierenced at a concert
>>
>>122913118
Early stereo classical records do sound great, for what it's worth. I've amassed a lot of choice rca living stereo and mercury living presence titles from thrift stores over the years



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.