>doesn't use Harman tuning to listen to his musicWhat are you waiting for?
I prefer Herman tuning
>>122915215What if the listener isn't using headphones?
>>122915215any easy way to try this out?
>>122916491https://autoeq.app/
why would i do this, i have k361.
>>122916617>k361Pretty close to Harman but there's an audible dip in the high mids.
>>122915215This is just a stupid tuning, no highs and an insane spike in the high mids (to which we are already more sensitive than other frequencies). It's like the perfect tuning if you want to get tinnitus
>>122916834It's meant to compensate for the interaction of the ear and the headphone. It's only valid for over-ear headphones. The result as heard is approximately the same as flat speakers in a moderately treated room.
>>122916557>no highsGreat, because I hate treble cannon tunings with a passion. Treble hurts far more. >>122916557You're a saint anon
>>122916834>The length of the ear canal (as mentioned above) causes the human ear to be most sensitive to a sound of frequency of 3,000 Hz. oofie this is true.
>>122916929And that's bad because?
>>122916939its not bad per se, just means it is a tinnitusmaxxing tuning.
>>122916976and i am not quite sure but the dip in the highs should make the mids even louder than what originally is in the eq, might be mistaken though.
>>122916976Tinnitus is called by piercing treble and rumbling bass, not by mid. If you up the mids, you should become more aware to not turn your volume louder as your own body will send pain signals.So it actually helps enjoy music at a lower volume.
>>122916851>It's only valid for over-ear headphones.That's odd because there are plenty of harman neutral iems
>>122917009kek anon i hope you dont actually believe this.
>>122917057Okay genius, tell me what tuning won't give me tinnitus.
>>122916557My headphones are too shit, they aren't even on the list
>>122917086How about one that doesnt have a +10db bump. I think you dont understand just how much louder +10db is
>>122917137Is this +10db bump with us right now?
>>122917177idk maybe does that eq account for you headphones chuning?
>>122917208Yes
>>122917236then you probably have that +10db at 3k just dont listen to music above 70dba
>>122916939Why would you boost (and it's not even a slight boost, it's a huge one) an area that is already naturally boosted in humans? It doesn't make any sense if what you're after is a flat frequency response. This is why a lot of ''studio headphones'' are shouty and sound like ass I suspect
>>122917872What headphones do you consider to sound good?
