Do you believe Satanism shaped pop music to a significant degree?
not at all
It still does, more than ever
>>123651868Well if by Satanism you mean "everything I don't like", then yes.
There’s nothing vaguely satanic about this record outside of the title. Even then you could just read it as them calling the royals satanic. You want to point fingers at the Stones being pro Satan then look to the album after this
Satanism is an offshoot of Christianity that uses the same history and language. Even the "atheist Satanists" are still basically just Christians because the whole thing is meant to parody Catholic mass. They arrange their entire philosophy around triggering Christians by trying to be their inversion
>>123652368It's one song and it's more a character study than an endorsement
>boyband pretending to be sataniclol
>>123652384Yeah this. But also >>123652320 is probably right and it was meant to say that The British Royal Family are evil. Even if The Rolling Stones are "cultural appropriation" by modern standards they were still either leftist or liberal (idfk) for that time. Probably meant as a critique of colonialism or something.
>>123651868In the case of Rock, Satanism is just aesthetic.
>>123654903No they were trying to follow trends to be cool just like they always did.It’s hilarious now to think the Rolling Stones were ever considered cool by anyone >>123654929Absolute lol, it’s cringe as fuck.
>>123651868All the best bands are affiliated with Santa. Hail Santa
>>123655213Now do one about Jews
>>123651868Satanism isn't a real thing. it's just fairy tales- dark version
>>123655377It doesn’t matter how real it is, what matters is who believes it to be true.
>>123651868Are you fucking kidding me? Of course it did.The forces of this world are evil.
>>123655377lmao ok bropic related: jeffrey dahmer’s altar. there definitely wasn’t any warped spiritual demonic activity or anything on…
>>123651868No, but pic posted is GOAT
>>123655466Fool
>>123654929fool
>>123655477What have you got against this particular album.It's one of The Rolling Stones best, even if they don't particularly like it themselves.
>>123655151I agree with you in terms of the context of the album itself and honestly it is pretty lame and generic and I do kinda lol when people say this is their favorite psych rock album although Paint it Black and Gimmie Shelter are pretty good songs and they did probably inspire some bands that I like. I agree most of those early 60s bands didn't age as well either. That being said:it was late 60s England. There's no way they just accidentally called The Queen Satanic without having some message there. It's not plausible that would be an oversight given how rich and famous they were. Someone must have brought it up at some point.
>>123651868Yes. https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8?si=DEAe1jmIKx-NHXWe
>>123655520Rolling stones are heavily involved in the occult dummySaturn, the moon, masonic poses and ceremonial garb on the album cover. The title. Mick Jaggar’s work with Kenneth Anger and scoring the film Lucifer Rising.Stop being such a dense fool bro. This stuff is real. You get fame and fortune in exchange for your soul and pushing the devil’s message of promiscuity.
>>123655547Revelation of the method. Jagger isn’t some street urchin, he was upper class glowie etc
>Do you believe counterculture shaped music
>>123655622Yeah, you probably think the stars and the crescent moon on Procter and Gamble products have some sort of symbolic satanic or masonic meaning.
>>123655879LOLOLOLOLOOOL “counter”culture
>>123651868I believe Tavistock was.
>>123656153Kinda yeah. I know I say a lot of "libtard" or "leftist" shit myself buy a band like The Rolling Stones were never really subversive. Rock only became truly subversive with the Psychedelia Movement and whatnot.
>>123655466checked and redpilled.it filtered me for a long time but when it clicked I shat, pissed and coomed.Citadel goes so fucking hard
>>123655411You either worship the devil or you don't. Something's isn't "satanic'' by virtue of being macabre.
>>123656294…Is it subversion if it’s what they want?
>>123655622>Rolling stones are heavily involved in the occultYes they've been occulting any good song they may have recorded in the last 30 years
>>123651868DefinitelyUnfortunately Some of the best music is influenced directly by Satan to some point like black midi, Death Grips, etc.
>>123655377Hey faggot you are objectively wrong
>>123651868religion is exactly like politics in the same sense that you can warp a narrative to fit anything into it. Something could be totally devoid of religious intent, and still be seen as aligning with certain spiritual beliefs. So i guess I believe all religion has significantly impacted art in one way or another, inadvertently or intentionally.
>>123656582“The road to hell is paved with good intentions” the masses unknowingly serve the devil and believe they’re good people.You’re objectively wrong.
>>123658907>actually EVERYTHING is satanic
>>123655466>>123656511>>123651868The best song wasnt even on the album https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBnGoS0n_VE
>>123660602Yeah, that’s what I said you duplicitous cunt.
>>123651868The mainstream music industry has always been satanic af
