>Leaves Paramore with his brother>Eventually goes back to Paramore and snakes his brotherChoosing money over family how vile
>>123672318Traded his pop punk garb to be a fake Antonoff. SAD!
>>123672318Josh is boomer grandmother-tier fundamentalist Christian. Still though, I miss that sound from Paramore a lot.
>>123672318That's not who I'd snake in Paramore nahmsayin?
>>123672318This post reeks of only child.
>>123672318you don't know the circumstances of the band arrangement. And why would his brother care if he goes back to the band to make a living?
>>123672824Yeah. Still pleased that Josh and Hayley both managed to get their royalty money from Rodrigo too. Read they were estimated to walk away with 500 K each.
>>123672318nick mullen was in paramore?
>>123672827Hayley williams was cute when she was underage, nahmeen?
>>123672318>he follows the details of .... paramore
>>123672318His brother was fine with it iirc, it's not like they hated Paramore after leaving. Sometimes you have to move on, or at least step away for a while. >>123674173Fuck that, those chords and that melody were nothing new. Copyright is so fucking weird.
>>123672318it's so weird that he's the youngest member of the band.
>>123674200Yes. And I'm gay.
>>123672318>now that my brother is gone the competition to fuck Hayley is cut by 30%
>>123679026Olivia leaned way too much into her "influences" dude. You say the chords and melody were nothing new, and that is the whole point. Olivia doesn't write her own stuff and her writers were retarded for rolling the dice with plagiarizing paramore. If olivia does write her own stuff then it is a case of bad luck or amateur and basic writing that landed her with a lawsuit
>>123679912>plagiarizingApparently Paramore was plagiarizing someone else, who in turn did it to someone else, ad infinitum. Like I said, copyright is bullshit as it is right now.https://youtu.be/qX7a2p5_JsM?si=60SXngmE4FLoBb1c
>>123681794the issue is modern songwriters overuse reference tracks. yes, the final product is distinct, but it's obvious to even a layperson that it's at its core a rewrite of something else. this makes new songs feel more familiar to listeners, but also can feel cheap and derivative. in this case, i don't think it was necessarily plagiarism, but it's very clear that misery biz was the primary reference track. and it's not like hayley/zac sued them or took them to court over it, seemed more like a preemptive decision to acknowledge the similarity. i think the blurred lines case spooked a lot of industry people into being extra extra careful with writing credits.
>>123682039meant josh not zac.
>>123682039Agreed.
