Post (anti-Stockhausenfag) bleeps. Fun+feels+soul > muh concepts/theorieshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tOutF8B3f8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z4cLmbw6q0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkZ3gPWYxc8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KN_lc-rJIohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDDnuZAL9pshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_lzNFjqGiwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk5Ma3UPNLMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu3FTEmN-eghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpKCqp9CALQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fijVymLdnbchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H66_PYTFBAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiMrrleH_hIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyPSxfSw23shttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxGN-WFbyMQFor any of the unfun Stockhausenfags out there, what are these "masterpieces" of the mentioned artists on your side? Will consider marathoning them but a simple list of names and mentioning of masterpieces is not going to make it. I only know Ripatti so let's start there, what is his masterpiece? Also, the list of masterpieces better be about 20h long too.Last threads:https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/123664762/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/123609390/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/123514090/https://desuarchive.org/mu/thread/123439743/Reminder to make /bleep/ threads yourself if the catalog is empty
>>123678126In the albums pictured here BT Ima is so much better than the rest of that meme shit it's not even funny. BT is insufferable but has vastly more engineering and compositional talent than any of the guys below, he is actually a genius, insufferable, but a genius.
Is there contemporary patrician electronic music? In a word, absolutely. But it's represented by avant-garde electroacoustic improvisation and experimental developments using progeria like Supercollider, not by some hack in a warehouse blasting an endless I-I-V-I progression over a glitched disco sample.EDMplebs are some of the most solipsistic in the world because they don't seem to realize that even the most "cutting-edge DJs" they can think of are 20-30 years behind the curve of _actual_ electronic music development.Honestly, to hear the way some of you get indignant when I bring this up. You don't realize that you're listening to the most populist, retrogressive, kindergarten exponent of the "style" you pretend to champion, and the worst part is the irony is completely lost on you. classical composers are paving the way in electronic music
>>123678220>doesn't post the 20h list of masterpieces>talks about concepts onlyThanks for proving my point. Will not read any further posts of you until you post the 20h counter list I can listen to that might make me join your supposed patrician guys. Is the Stockhausen album you posted the established masterpiece among your kind? I better not see any contradictions from other Stockhausenfags joining this thread. Post the fucking list and let the music do the work, fuck your concepts/walls of texts because you come across as a leftist meme.Also pretty funny that one artist is literally in both lists.
>>123678220>classical composers are paving the way in electronic musicso like BT?
>>123678200What is your #1 BT song? And do you think he is better than AFX? If so, how?
>>123678126I agree but all the artists you posted have way better albums than the ones you linked
*friendily introduce u to ektoplazm.com*
>>123678653>doesn't post a single bleep
>Can we talk about the music we sent you? It was very good of you to listen to it. I wonder if you could give some advice to these musicians.I wish those musicians would not allow themselves any repetitions, and would go faster in developing their ideas or their findings, because I don't appreciate at all this permanent repetitive language. It is like someone who is stuttering all the time, and can't get words out of his mouth. I think musicians should have very concise figures and not rely on this fashionable psychology. I don't like psychology whatsoever: using music like a drug is stupid. One shouldn't do that : music is the product of the highest human intelligence, and of the best senses, the listening senses and of imagination and intuition. And as soon as it becomes just a means for ambiance, as we say, environment, or for being used for certain purposes, then music becomes a whore, and one should not allow that really; one should not serve any existing demands or in particular not commercial values. That would be terrible: that is selling out the music.I heard the piece Aphex Twin of Richard James carefully: I think it would be very helpful if he listens to my work Song Of The Youth, which is electronic music, and a young boy's voice singing with himself. Because he would then immediately stop with all these post-African repetitions, and he would look for changing tempi and changing rhythms, and he would not allow to repeat any rhythm if it were varied to some extent and if it did not have a direction in its sequence of variations.
And the other composer - musician, I don't know if they call themselves composers...>They're sometimes called 'sound artists'...No, 'Technocrats', you called them. He's called Plasticman, and in public, Richie Hawtin. It starts with 30 or 40 - I don't know, I haven't counted them - fifths in parallel, always the same perfect fifths, you see, changing from one to the next, and then comes in hundreds of repetitions of one small section of an African rhythm: duh-duh-dum, etc, and I think it would be helpful if he listened to Cycle for percussion, which is only a 15 minute long piece of mine for a percussionist, but there he will have a hell to understand the rhythms, and I think he will get a taste for very interesting non-metric and non-periodic rhythms. I know that he wants to have a special effect in dancing bars, or wherever it is, on the public who like to dream away with such repetitions, but he should be very careful, because the public will sell him out immediately for something else, if a new kind of musical drug is on the market. So he should be very careful and separate as soon as possible from the belief in this kind of public.
The other is Robin Rimbaud, Scanner, I've heard, with radio noises. He is very experimental, because he is searching in a realm of sound which is not usually used for music. But I think he should transform more what he finds. He leaves it too much in a raw state. He has a good sense of atmosphere, but he is too repetitive again. So let him listen to my work Hymnen. There are found objects - a lot like he finds with his scanner, you see. But I think he should learn from the art of transformation, so that what you find sounds completely new, as I sometimes say, like an apple on the moon.Then there's another one: Daniel Pemberton. His work which I heard has noise loops: he likes loops, a loop effect, like in musique concrète, where I worked in 1952, and Pierre Henry and Schaeffer himself, they found some sounds, like say the sounds of a casserole, they made a loop, and then they transposed this loop. So I think he should give up this loop; it is too oldfashioned. Really. He likes train rhythms, and I think when he comes to a soft spot, a quiet, his harmony sounds to my ears like ice cream harmony. It is so kitchy; he should stay away from these ninths and sevenths and tenths in parallel: so, look for a harmony that sounds new and sounds like Pemberton and not like anything else. He should listen to Kontakte, which has among my works the largest scale of harmonic, unusual and very demanding harmonic relationships. I like to tell the musicians that they should learn from works which already gone through a lot of temptations and have refused to give in to these stylistic or to these fashionable temptations..
>Advice from clever children...>Following Stockhausen's advice to our Technocrats, we decided to play them excerpts from the compositions which the German composer suggested they listen to and learn from. Here's what they had to say...>Aphex Twin on Song Of The YouthMental! I've heard that song before; I like it. I didn't agree with him. I thought he should listen to a couple of tracks of mine: "Didgeridoo", then he'd stop making abstract, random patterns you can't dance to. Do you reckon he can dance? You could dance to Song of the Youth, but it hasn't got a groove in it, there's no bassline. I know it was probably made in the 50s, but I've got plenty of wicked percussion records made in the 50s that are awesome to dance to. And they've got basslines. I could remix it: I don't know about making it better; I wouldn't want to make it into a dance version, but I could probably make it a bit more anally technical.But I'm sure he could these days, because tape is really slow. I used to do things like that with tape, but it does take forever, and I'd never do anything like that again with tape. Once you've got your computer sorted out, it pisses all over stuff like that, you can do stuff so fast. It has a different sound, but a bit more anal. I haven't heard anything new by him; the last thing was a vocal record, Stimmung, and I didn't really like that. Would I take his comments to heart? The ideal thing would be to meet him in a room and have a wicked discussion. For all I know, he could be taking the piss. It's a bit hard to have a discussion with someone via other people. I don't think I care about what he thinks. It is interesting, but it's disappointing, because you'd imagine he'd say that anyway. It wasn't anything surprising. I don't know anything about the guy, but I expected him to have that sort of attitude. Loops are good to dance to...He should hang out with me and my mates: that would be a laugh. I'd be quite into having him around.
>Scanner on HymnenIt's interesting that I've not heard this before, and maybe Thomas Köner hasn't and so on, but you can relate it to our work. I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I was two years old when this was written! Stockhausen says he don't like repetitions: what I like about repetition is it can draw the listener and lull you into a false sense of security, but when it gets too abstract - this is cut-ups - I find it very difficult to digest over a long period of time. He's a lapsed Catholic, and there's the sense that it's meant to be a religious experience passing through these records, like a purging of the system. Whether you like it or not, you're affected in one way or another. I'd like to hear this live.I prefer the gentler passages. I do find myself irritated by that barrage of sound against sound over a long period of time: an alternative kind of repetition. That's why I like Jim O'Rourke's work, because it works over long periods.I wonder about him putting himself into the recording; is it a vanity thing, or part of the process? With the scanner, it's like live editing, which is like this as well. When you scan, if you don't like something you flick between frequencies, when you DJ you cut between records, and it is an art form as a form of live editing...
Reminds me of the Holger Czukay LP Der Osten Ist Rot, cutting between national anthems, like tuning through a radio: I don't know whether this is actually happening or not. this is very good actually - better than I expected. At the end there's a recording of him breathing. It's quite uncomfortable - like being inside his head. I take some of what he said about my music to heart. Part of what I'm interested in is transforming material. Lots of the sounds I use are off the scanner or the shortwave radio. Lots of people wouldn't realise that sometimes a bass sound isn't a keyboard bass sound: it's a little blip on the phone. So I do try and transform the material as much as possible. I disagree about repetition: I think, as John Cage said, repetition is a form of change, and it's a concept you either agree or disagree with. I like repetitions; I like Richie Hawtin's work for that very aspect. In a way it is like a religious experience: if his work is about spirituality, then this is a kind of alternative, non-religious spirituality, where you're drawn in by this block of rhythm; it's an incredible feeling, the way it moves you physically, and moves you in a dancefloor as well. Things like this are designed to be listened to over long periods of time, and sometimes I think it could do with some editing. Most contemporary sound artists are working within a four to ten minute time scale, basically. And to be honest, for most people that's enough.
>Daniel Pemberton on KontakteAt first I expected someone hitting a piano randomly, but there were happenings in there, with stereo panning and effects. I was very impressed considering the time it was done: the 1960s. He was going on about how everyone's stuff was repetitive, but his stuff is the complete opposite: so unrepetitive that it never really got anywhere. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it didn't have any development in it: sounded like an Old School FSOL. When he recommends Kontakte for its "very demanding harmonic relationships", it sounds a bit suspect to me: the whole piece seems to be dealing far morewith timbre than with harmonic relationship. It's obviously based around sound, and any harmonics on there, to the non-musical ear, sound like a piano hit randomly. It would be very good to put some HipHop breaks under, actually.
What he said about me was quite funny: he accuses me of old hat... I was born in 1977, 25 after [Kontakte], a longer time than I've lived. I'm still learning musical history. If my whole career goes down the pan, at least I've got a future with Mr Whippy! And for him to call eigths, ninth and tenths 'kitschy'! The scales I commonly use aren't too adventurous, but that's because they're the ones that sound nice. The stuff I've done which is unlistenable, I haven't released because no one would enjoy it. It's good to have other people's views. I ignore them in the sense that I know what I want to do: his criticisms won't make me throw everything away and start working with bizarre new scales and fantastic new instruments. I know what he means about loops though; that's because I haven't got much equipment. Get a chewn, mate! I think he should develop his music a bit more. Try and repeat some of the ideas, work on them, build them up; you can still change them. He should listen to a track off my forthcoming album, Homemade. Stockhausen should experiment more with standard melodies, try and subvert them; he should stop being so afraid of the normal: by being so afraid of the normal he's being normal himself by being the complete opposite. He should try to blend the two together: that would be new and interesting. To me, anyway.
Stockhausen https://youtu.be/KC0nNFNmaGs?si=sPkjiKAyiqIcaXS8
https://vocaroo.com/1g42oiuFjdMZdo u think I have what it takes to /bleep/?
>I heard the piece Aphex Twin of Richard James carefully: I think it would be very helpful if he listens to my work Song Of The Youth, which is electronic music, and a young boy's voice singing with himself. Because he would then immediately stop with all these post-African repetitions, and he would look for changing tempi and changing rhythms, and he would not allow to repeat any rhythm if it were varied to some extent and if it did not have a direction in its sequence of variations.ten years later i still cant get over this part. even if its your opinon, fine, whatever, but how fucking full of yourself can you be to put it like that?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snem3nS01SQ
What's your favorite isolatedmix /bleep/?
>>123679263Lol, learn how to music first
>>123679151>>123679165>>123679175>>123679185>>123679196>>123679210>>123679216>>123679226>"Hey man could you specify the 20 masterpieces of the mentioned "patrician" artists that are supposedly better than my 20 albums? Just post the 20 masterpieces, no need for big walls of text, just those 20, I will take a listen.">Posts EVEN MORE walls of texts with no list to be foundYeah I am not going to read all of that, you pretentious faggot. Post the 20 or fuck off.>>123679310He sounds so pretentious.>all these post-African repetitionsLol, not disagreeing here.
>>123682253I'm OP/eternal tourist btw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjcIaXkE3bAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHyaWFCUIVohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vk0Ay4Kvmsfug stoghauzen :D
best dj mix of all timehttp://mp3.hardnrg.com/morgan/Morgan-Decepticon.mp3
>>123679310>>123682253Well, he ended up taking his advice in a way
>>123678126Eno shouldn't be there btw
Only minimal techno is pure enoughhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65jZ9f7nrIQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwBQdqJbStA
>>123684376This collab so much cooler than the music. Whadda shame :/
>>123684376saw them live on a beach a few years ago, it was pretty good. not groundbreaking but it was the cleanest sounding act of the day
>>123678126What do these decrepit boomers have to do with /bleep/?
The autecjhe stopped doing post African repetitions and looks at the state of em now
>>123689011Saw this meme in an earlier electronic music thread and got curious because I like to expand my horizons. So I made this thread to trigger Stockhausenfags and give me a 20h list to "own" me but all I got was a wall of text spamming retard. I guess there is no list, just shallow pretentiousness.>>123689077What tracks from Amber have post-African repetitions?
